Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Kirk's Jackson Bell 62
#34

Kirk

Before you mail it to me, see if

1. The field coil conducts (on the order of 1kOhm or so..units of kOhms),
2. Primary of the output transformer is good (a few hundred Ohms to a few kOhms).
If yes, let me know first, as I will try the one I have tonight, and if it works, we could skip that mailing things, as the less stuff I have right now the better, considering the impending move.


3. If it comes to shipping, throw in a power cord if you have one you want installed.
4. And the 42 tube is weak. Will likely work, but keep in mind it is weak (800 vs 1600 req min for a new one) and a stronger one might work better.

But I am getting ahead of myself, let's first hear it speak.


Messages In This Thread
Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-18-2015, 12:00 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 01-18-2015, 01:23 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 01-18-2015, 11:08 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 01-18-2015, 11:12 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-18-2015, 12:56 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-18-2015, 09:00 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 01-18-2015, 11:35 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 01-18-2015, 11:19 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-18-2015, 11:30 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-19-2015, 11:47 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 01-20-2015, 01:30 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-20-2015, 02:15 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 01-23-2015, 10:00 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-23-2015, 06:02 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 01-23-2015, 06:13 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Ron Ramirez - 01-23-2015, 11:12 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 01-24-2015, 01:29 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 01-24-2015, 09:42 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-24-2015, 09:38 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-25-2015, 08:31 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 01-25-2015, 10:06 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by hunter2115 - 01-26-2015, 08:33 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-26-2015, 09:25 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by hunter2115 - 01-26-2015, 09:43 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-26-2015, 09:52 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-26-2015, 09:56 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-26-2015, 10:21 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-02-2015, 09:23 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-02-2015, 09:52 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 02-03-2015, 01:44 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-02-2015, 10:30 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by KCMike - 02-02-2015, 11:39 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-03-2015, 09:22 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 02-05-2015, 01:16 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-03-2015, 12:55 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 02-05-2015, 01:13 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-03-2015, 01:03 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-03-2015, 01:04 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-03-2015, 05:57 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-03-2015, 11:50 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-04-2015, 12:01 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-04-2015, 12:41 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-04-2015, 10:21 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-05-2015, 12:26 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 02-07-2015, 02:09 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-05-2015, 03:11 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-05-2015, 05:16 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-05-2015, 07:58 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-05-2015, 09:07 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-05-2015, 09:26 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-05-2015, 10:33 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-06-2015, 01:24 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-06-2015, 03:55 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-06-2015, 09:51 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-06-2015, 10:55 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-06-2015, 09:39 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-06-2015, 10:07 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by KCMike - 02-06-2015, 10:20 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-06-2015, 11:04 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-07-2015, 12:29 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-07-2015, 04:53 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-08-2015, 12:34 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-08-2015, 08:12 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-08-2015, 01:36 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-08-2015, 02:30 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-08-2015, 11:06 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 02-09-2015, 12:30 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-09-2015, 08:00 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-09-2015, 11:52 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-09-2015, 12:01 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-09-2015, 05:25 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-09-2015, 06:28 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by KCMike - 02-09-2015, 07:38 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-09-2015, 07:42 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-09-2015, 09:10 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Eliot Ness - 02-10-2015, 01:00 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-09-2015, 10:08 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-10-2015, 01:05 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-10-2015, 08:11 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-10-2015, 09:44 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Eliot Ness - 02-11-2015, 02:44 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-10-2015, 11:58 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-11-2015, 10:14 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-11-2015, 12:50 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-11-2015, 12:56 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-11-2015, 02:34 PM



Users browsing this thread: 13 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
trying to identify this wire type
Thanks to all for the feedback. As Arran said, it is probably an older replacement and yes it has a grid cap so I will ...georgetownjohn — 09:32 PM
trying to identify this wire type
It's possible that the red wire, actually a grid cap lead, is a very old replacement, I can't remember seeing a pre 1939...Arran — 09:18 PM
Gilfillan Brothers Car Radio?
Hi everyone,  Special thanks to Joe Rossi for tracking down this obscure radio and thanks to others who took up the hun...Antipodal — 08:15 PM
trying to identify this wire type
Here's one source for your wire of many. Take care and BE HEALTHY! Gary P.S. Can't get the right color you need? I ...GarySP — 06:40 PM
trying to identify this wire type
...and modern wire of the appropriate gauges and insulation V-rating (300V minimum, usually shown right on the wire) is ...morzh — 05:47 PM
1930s Stromberg-Carlson Tombstone Radio need help identifying model number
I have a question about this radio, is there anyone that has access to this radio that has an intact unmolested speaker ...captainclock1988 — 04:28 PM
1930s Stromberg-Carlson Tombstone Radio need help identifying model number
Well what makes me confuse all of those companies is that all three of those companies (Setchell-Carlson, Stromberg-Carl...captainclock1988 — 04:21 PM
trying to identify this wire type
The red wire is rubber covered wire. The others are cotton braid over rubber often in colors or a tracer, also strand...Chas — 02:43 PM
trying to identify this wire type
Greetings Phorum members, Hope you can help me identify this type of wire in the photo I have attached.  I am not sure ...georgetownjohn — 01:53 PM
Philco 60 Squealing
All correct shields must be in place, all tubes correct no subs of any kind. Check any soldered, riveted ground conne...Chas — 01:24 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>