Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Kirk's Jackson Bell 62
#50

OK.


The coils all fixed.
No short in the load.

Now.
First no sound at all. Suspected the speaker.
Then upon reinserting detector tube heard the buzz when touching the grid.
Then with the screwdriver touching det grid heard reception. Weak.
Touching the previous tube gives even weaker one.
Antenna gives zero.

Well, it is a progress, good high voltage and some life.
Now. I supect part of the problem is the fild coil, might not drop enough and the output plate voltage is 340V whereas should be 225V. Could screw things up.
Even adjusted for a DMM reading it is too high.

Will try some gimmicks....


PS. Kirk, were you able to measure field resistance on your speaker?


P.P.S. Adding 2.2K in series with the FC took extra 30V from the output pate but did not improve the reception.


Messages In This Thread
Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-18-2015, 12:00 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 01-18-2015, 01:23 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 01-18-2015, 11:08 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 01-18-2015, 11:12 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-18-2015, 12:56 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-18-2015, 09:00 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 01-18-2015, 11:35 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 01-18-2015, 11:19 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-18-2015, 11:30 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-19-2015, 11:47 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 01-20-2015, 01:30 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-20-2015, 02:15 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 01-23-2015, 10:00 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-23-2015, 06:02 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 01-23-2015, 06:13 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Ron Ramirez - 01-23-2015, 11:12 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 01-24-2015, 01:29 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 01-24-2015, 09:42 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-24-2015, 09:38 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-25-2015, 08:31 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 01-25-2015, 10:06 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by hunter2115 - 01-26-2015, 08:33 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-26-2015, 09:25 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by hunter2115 - 01-26-2015, 09:43 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-26-2015, 09:52 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-26-2015, 09:56 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-26-2015, 10:21 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-02-2015, 09:23 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-02-2015, 09:52 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 02-03-2015, 01:44 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-02-2015, 10:30 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by KCMike - 02-02-2015, 11:39 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-03-2015, 09:22 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 02-05-2015, 01:16 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-03-2015, 12:55 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 02-05-2015, 01:13 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-03-2015, 01:03 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-03-2015, 01:04 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-03-2015, 05:57 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-03-2015, 11:50 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-04-2015, 12:01 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-04-2015, 12:41 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-04-2015, 10:21 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-05-2015, 12:26 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 02-07-2015, 02:09 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-05-2015, 03:11 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-05-2015, 05:16 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-05-2015, 07:58 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-05-2015, 09:07 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-05-2015, 09:26 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-05-2015, 10:33 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-06-2015, 01:24 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-06-2015, 03:55 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-06-2015, 09:51 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-06-2015, 10:55 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-06-2015, 09:39 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-06-2015, 10:07 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by KCMike - 02-06-2015, 10:20 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-06-2015, 11:04 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-07-2015, 12:29 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-07-2015, 04:53 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-08-2015, 12:34 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-08-2015, 08:12 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-08-2015, 01:36 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-08-2015, 02:30 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-08-2015, 11:06 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 02-09-2015, 12:30 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-09-2015, 08:00 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-09-2015, 11:52 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-09-2015, 12:01 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-09-2015, 05:25 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-09-2015, 06:28 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by KCMike - 02-09-2015, 07:38 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-09-2015, 07:42 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-09-2015, 09:10 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Eliot Ness - 02-10-2015, 01:00 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-09-2015, 10:08 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-10-2015, 01:05 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-10-2015, 08:11 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-10-2015, 09:44 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Eliot Ness - 02-11-2015, 02:44 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-10-2015, 11:58 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-11-2015, 10:14 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-11-2015, 12:50 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-11-2015, 12:56 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-11-2015, 02:34 PM



Users browsing this thread: 18 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
12' Philco
If it is 12', either Kareem or Andre would have to jump pretty high to look at the front panel. Kareem would have an e...morzh — 01:48 PM
12' Philco
And here's a story about the tires on the truck. Same "no-stoop" guy must have installed these! Take care a...GarySP — 01:17 PM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
I think they have only shown the secondaries of the transformer. Two of them feed the rectifiers' filaments.morzh — 12:58 PM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
Arran If the wire inside cans is the gauges you mentioned, the sole reason for that would be mechanical, to stiffen t...morzh — 12:56 PM
12' Philco
Rod, Yes, I know, but the Giant Philco is not around anymore either, so I go by whoever was alive fairly recently. H...morzh — 12:54 PM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
Absolutely no one is going to reverse engineer that circuit. Even the iron core is missing.RodB — 10:37 AM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
Thanks to both members for your help regarding wire and tuner mtg supports. regards--Johngeorgetownjohn — 09:33 AM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
Note that no power cord, power switch, or power transformer switch are shown. That (along with my experience with full s...DaleHCook — 07:09 AM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
A pair of wire strippers can give you an idea of what the existing gauge of the wire leads are in the IF can, I think it...Arran — 06:07 AM
My last cabinet for this year
Hello Dan, That is really beautiful what great looking radio you have ! I have friends who live in Calgary and the wea...radiorich — 01:51 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 5217 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 5216 Guest(s)
Avatar

>