Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Kirk's Jackson Bell 62
#55

OK. First good nooz.

The radio sings loud.
The problem was bad soldering of divider resistors so none of the toobs really conducted except the output one (hence the weak reception), as all SGs were at 0V. What drew my attention was that all plates were sitting at 320V and this was also the B+. So I measured the SG dividers....sure'nuff.

Now bad nooz is the tuning cap or chassis as a whole when touched gets scratchy and, as if there is had connection, and the reception goes away.
There is also howling when the volume is at the max or close.

But...progress.


Messages In This Thread
Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-18-2015, 12:00 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 01-18-2015, 01:23 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 01-18-2015, 11:08 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 01-18-2015, 11:12 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-18-2015, 12:56 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-18-2015, 09:00 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 01-18-2015, 11:35 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 01-18-2015, 11:19 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-18-2015, 11:30 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-19-2015, 11:47 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 01-20-2015, 01:30 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-20-2015, 02:15 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 01-23-2015, 10:00 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-23-2015, 06:02 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 01-23-2015, 06:13 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Ron Ramirez - 01-23-2015, 11:12 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 01-24-2015, 01:29 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 01-24-2015, 09:42 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-24-2015, 09:38 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-25-2015, 08:31 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 01-25-2015, 10:06 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by hunter2115 - 01-26-2015, 08:33 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-26-2015, 09:25 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by hunter2115 - 01-26-2015, 09:43 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-26-2015, 09:52 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-26-2015, 09:56 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-26-2015, 10:21 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-02-2015, 09:23 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-02-2015, 09:52 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 02-03-2015, 01:44 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-02-2015, 10:30 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by KCMike - 02-02-2015, 11:39 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-03-2015, 09:22 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 02-05-2015, 01:16 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-03-2015, 12:55 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 02-05-2015, 01:13 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-03-2015, 01:03 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-03-2015, 01:04 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-03-2015, 05:57 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-03-2015, 11:50 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-04-2015, 12:01 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-04-2015, 12:41 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-04-2015, 10:21 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-05-2015, 12:26 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 02-07-2015, 02:09 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-05-2015, 03:11 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-05-2015, 05:16 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-05-2015, 07:58 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-05-2015, 09:07 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-05-2015, 09:26 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-05-2015, 10:33 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-06-2015, 01:24 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-06-2015, 03:55 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-06-2015, 09:51 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-06-2015, 10:55 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-06-2015, 09:39 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-06-2015, 10:07 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by KCMike - 02-06-2015, 10:20 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-06-2015, 11:04 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-07-2015, 12:29 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-07-2015, 04:53 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-08-2015, 12:34 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-08-2015, 08:12 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-08-2015, 01:36 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-08-2015, 02:30 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-08-2015, 11:06 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 02-09-2015, 12:30 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-09-2015, 08:00 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-09-2015, 11:52 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-09-2015, 12:01 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-09-2015, 05:25 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-09-2015, 06:28 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by KCMike - 02-09-2015, 07:38 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-09-2015, 07:42 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-09-2015, 09:10 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Eliot Ness - 02-10-2015, 01:00 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-09-2015, 10:08 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-10-2015, 01:05 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-10-2015, 08:11 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-10-2015, 09:44 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Eliot Ness - 02-11-2015, 02:44 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-10-2015, 11:58 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-11-2015, 10:14 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-11-2015, 12:50 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-11-2015, 12:56 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-11-2015, 02:34 PM



Users browsing this thread: 16 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
12' Philco
If it is 12', either Kareem or Andre would have to jump pretty high to look at the front panel. Kareem would have an e...morzh — 01:48 PM
12' Philco
And here's a story about the tires on the truck. Same "no-stoop" guy must have installed these! Take care a...GarySP — 01:17 PM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
I think they have only shown the secondaries of the transformer. Two of them feed the rectifiers' filaments.morzh — 12:58 PM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
Arran If the wire inside cans is the gauges you mentioned, the sole reason for that would be mechanical, to stiffen t...morzh — 12:56 PM
12' Philco
Rod, Yes, I know, but the Giant Philco is not around anymore either, so I go by whoever was alive fairly recently. H...morzh — 12:54 PM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
Absolutely no one is going to reverse engineer that circuit. Even the iron core is missing.RodB — 10:37 AM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
Thanks to both members for your help regarding wire and tuner mtg supports. regards--Johngeorgetownjohn — 09:33 AM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
Note that no power cord, power switch, or power transformer switch are shown. That (along with my experience with full s...DaleHCook — 07:09 AM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
A pair of wire strippers can give you an idea of what the existing gauge of the wire leads are in the IF can, I think it...Arran — 06:07 AM
My last cabinet for this year
Hello Dan, That is really beautiful what great looking radio you have ! I have friends who live in Calgary and the wea...radiorich — 01:51 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>