Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Polyurethane vs Lacquer
#6

 Polyurethane is worse then that, whenever I used it or alkyd varnish, it was more or less dry to the touch in 24 hours, but I had to wait three or four days before I could sand it and coat it again. This reminds me of some visitor to the alternative forum, they ended up with a console that had been passed down through the family, and had a more or less nice original finish, and asked about it's value. So what did he do with it?, he applied polyurethane over it to "preserve" it.
 I told him that by applying the poly on top he just killed a good percentage of collectable and monetary value and explained why, much as Ron did above. He did not like that very much and started arguing with me about how his father, the wood worker, told him how horrible lacquer was, blah, blah, blah. Curious with these self proclaimed experts that they didn't learn what I learned back in school, that you don't apply dissimilar finishes on top of each other, certainly not over top of a nice original finish on a vintage piece?
Regards
Arran


Messages In This Thread
Polyurethane vs Lacquer - by mornflt - 02-17-2015, 07:57 PM
RE: Polyurethane vs Lacquer - by morzh - 02-17-2015, 08:07 PM
Polyurethane vs Lacquer - by lacountyretired - 02-17-2015, 08:09 PM
RE: Polyurethane vs Lacquer - by Ron Ramirez - 02-17-2015, 08:28 PM
RE: Polyurethane vs Lacquer - by morzh - 02-17-2015, 08:31 PM
RE: Polyurethane vs Lacquer - by Arran - 02-17-2015, 11:10 PM
RE: Polyurethane vs Lacquer - by morzh - 02-17-2015, 11:31 PM
RE: Polyurethane vs Lacquer - by Chuck Schwark - 02-18-2015, 10:36 AM
RE: Polyurethane vs Lacquer - by JimZ - 02-18-2015, 11:51 AM
RE: Polyurethane vs Lacquer - by Squire - 02-23-2015, 06:29 PM
RE: Polyurethane vs Lacquer - by JimTheUmp - 02-23-2015, 10:32 PM
RE: Polyurethane vs Lacquer - by morzh - 02-23-2015, 10:39 PM
RE: Polyurethane vs Lacquer - by Phlogiston - 03-19-2015, 10:19 AM
RE: Polyurethane vs Lacquer - by lacountyretired - 03-19-2015, 10:36 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Shadow Meter Bulb
Phorum members, I am trying to find the bulb # for PHILCO Shadow Meter part number 45-2180 that is from a 37-640 chassis...georgetownjohn — 06:53 PM
Philco 41-608 changer coupler
3D-printing...short of machining, of course. Or molding.morzh — 05:20 PM
Philco 41-608 changer coupler
Thanks, Morzh. That solves the issue of the rubber pieces. Now, I need to find a way to replicate the pot metal piec...alangard — 05:07 PM
12' Philco
If it is 12', either Kareem or Andre would have to jump pretty high to look at the front panel. Kareem would have an e...morzh — 01:48 PM
12' Philco
And here's a story about the tires on the truck. Same "no-stoop" guy must have installed these! Take care a...GarySP — 01:17 PM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
I think they have only shown the secondaries of the transformer. Two of them feed the rectifiers' filaments.morzh — 12:58 PM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
Arran If the wire inside cans is the gauges you mentioned, the sole reason for that would be mechanical, to stiffen t...morzh — 12:56 PM
12' Philco
Rod, Yes, I know, but the Giant Philco is not around anymore either, so I go by whoever was alive fairly recently. H...morzh — 12:54 PM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
Absolutely no one is going to reverse engineer that circuit. Even the iron core is missing.RodB — 10:37 AM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
Thanks to both members for your help regarding wire and tuner mtg supports. regards--Johngeorgetownjohn — 09:33 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>