Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Heirloom 41-250
#31

In my schematics from the Philco 1941 Yearbook, part 57 in the 41-280/285 is a .002 uF condenser between the plates of the two 41 tubes, which is a different way of saying between the white and black wires from the output transformer. Part 68 is a 33 ohm resistor in series with the dial light used only in the 41-287, so ignore it.

In the 41-250/255 schematic, parts 57 and 68 are .003 uF condensers from the plates of each of the 41 tubes to ground.

It's only a guess, but since the 280/285s are consoles with larger speakers, the difference might be to adjust the tone for use with the tabletop and console speakers, maybe to give the larger speaker a brighter sound or reduce boominess. Conversely, maybe they wanted to add bass to the smaller table top speakers.

If it wuz me, I'd leave the 41-285 chassis stock and not modify it to agree with the 41-255 schematic. I used a 41-250 chassis in my 41-280 cabinet for a few weeks while I was recapping my 41-280 chassis without noticing any difference in the tone. Of course, if I understand it right, you're going the other way: using the console chassis in the tabletop cabinet. Still, I think I'd leave it original. If you don't like the tone and can't adjust it to your liking with the bass control, it should be simple to make the change.

One could argue the other way, I suppose, to make the change now and unmake it if the tone isn't satisfactory. After all, you're mixing and matching the chassis and cabinet anyway. Since your chassis is stamped 41-285 I think I'd make a little effort to keep it all 41-285. But I'm only a little bit of a purist. I'd never say leave it original even if it sounds bad. And it's your radio any way you play it.

John Honeycutt


Messages In This Thread
Heirloom 41-250 - by MarkBardenwerper - 07-09-2015, 10:48 PM
RE: Heirloom 41-250 - by klondike98 - 07-09-2015, 11:27 PM
RE: Heirloom 41-250 - by MarkBardenwerper - 07-09-2015, 11:35 PM
RE: Heirloom 41-250 - by Ron Ramirez - 07-10-2015, 06:09 AM
RE: Heirloom 41-250 - by lenmiller - 07-10-2015, 12:45 PM
RE: Heirloom 41-250 - by KCMike - 07-10-2015, 02:34 PM
RE: Heirloom 41-250 - by MarkBardenwerper - 07-10-2015, 10:13 PM
RE: Heirloom 41-250 - by MarkBardenwerper - 07-12-2015, 09:46 PM
RE: Heirloom 41-250 - by TA Forbes - 07-13-2015, 01:36 PM
RE: Heirloom 41-250 - by MarkBardenwerper - 07-14-2015, 10:01 PM
RE: Heirloom 41-250 - by MarkBardenwerper - 07-15-2015, 11:26 PM
RE: Heirloom 41-250 - by Arran - 07-16-2015, 04:15 AM
RE: Heirloom 41-250 - by MarkBardenwerper - 07-16-2015, 12:03 AM
RE: Heirloom 41-250 - by klondike98 - 07-16-2015, 01:41 AM
RE: Heirloom 41-250 - by MarkBardenwerper - 07-16-2015, 10:16 PM
RE: Heirloom 41-250 - by Radioroslyn - 07-17-2015, 06:44 AM
RE: Heirloom 41-250 - by MarkBardenwerper - 07-17-2015, 11:29 PM
RE: Heirloom 41-250 - by Radioroslyn - 07-18-2015, 06:56 AM
RE: Heirloom 41-250 - by MarkBardenwerper - 07-19-2015, 01:06 PM
RE: Heirloom 41-250 - by jerryhawthorne - 07-19-2015, 03:20 PM
RE: Heirloom 41-250 - by MarkBardenwerper - 07-19-2015, 09:40 PM
RE: Heirloom 41-250 - by MarkBardenwerper - 07-29-2015, 10:10 PM
RE: Heirloom 41-250 - by Raleigh - 07-29-2015, 11:57 PM
RE: Heirloom 41-250 - by MarkBardenwerper - 07-30-2015, 08:51 AM
RE: Heirloom 41-250 - by Raleigh - 08-01-2015, 04:33 PM
RE: Heirloom 41-250 - by MarkBardenwerper - 08-02-2015, 08:41 AM
RE: Heirloom 41-250 - by MarkBardenwerper - 08-16-2015, 11:03 PM
RE: Heirloom 41-250 - by codefox1 - 08-17-2015, 05:59 PM
RE: Heirloom 41-250 - by MarkBardenwerper - 08-17-2015, 09:24 PM
RE: Heirloom 41-250 - by MarkBardenwerper - 08-17-2015, 11:53 PM
RE: Heirloom 41-250 - by Raleigh - 08-18-2015, 04:35 AM
RE: Heirloom 41-250 - by MarkBardenwerper - 08-18-2015, 08:45 AM
RE: Heirloom 41-250 - by Eliot Ness - 08-18-2015, 09:31 AM
RE: Heirloom 41-250 - by MarkBardenwerper - 09-09-2015, 11:11 PM
RE: Heirloom 41-250 - by MarkBardenwerper - 09-09-2015, 11:26 PM
RE: Heirloom 41-250 - by Mondial - 09-10-2015, 08:19 AM
RE: Heirloom 41-250 - by MarkBardenwerper - 09-10-2015, 08:33 AM



Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
Tim, nice write up and thanks for sharing !! Sincerely Richardradiorich — 02:47 AM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
Well, this was a real "Hum-Dinger" :lol: ! This will be kinda long, but hopefully it will help others having t...TV MAN — 01:55 AM
Shadow Meter Bulb
Phorum members, I am trying to find the bulb # for PHILCO Shadow Meter part number 45-2180 that is from a 37-640 chassis...georgetownjohn — 06:53 PM
Philco 41-608 changer coupler
3D-printing...short of machining, of course. Or molding.morzh — 05:20 PM
Philco 41-608 changer coupler
Thanks, Morzh. That solves the issue of the rubber pieces. Now, I need to find a way to replicate the pot metal piec...alangard — 05:07 PM
12' Philco
If it is 12', either Kareem or Andre would have to jump pretty high to look at the front panel. Kareem would have an e...morzh — 01:48 PM
12' Philco
And here's a story about the tires on the truck. Same "no-stoop" guy must have installed these! Take care a...GarySP — 01:17 PM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
I think they have only shown the secondaries of the transformer. Two of them feed the rectifiers' filaments.morzh — 12:58 PM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
Arran If the wire inside cans is the gauges you mentioned, the sole reason for that would be mechanical, to stiffen t...morzh — 12:56 PM
12' Philco
Rod, Yes, I know, but the Giant Philco is not around anymore either, so I go by whoever was alive fairly recently. H...morzh — 12:54 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>