Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Majestic 86
#1

Last thurday I did a little running and decided to make what is probably my final stop at an antique mall I've been visiting for the past 5 to six years. (Nothing personal, just changing interests is all.) This radio has been there the whole time sitting with a $180 price tag on it. On Thursday it was sitting in a clearance area with a $50 price tag on it. I've always thought this radio interesting due to using a type 53 output tube and it basically represents the end of the Grisby-Grunow Majestic line. So, it came home with me this time. Looks like someone subbed a 2S tube for one of the 4S tubes, but I guess that was considered a suitable tube substitute. The tag said the radio worked, but all it does is hum. Still, I have audio and the transformer seemed to test good. So, might be an interesting project.

   

   

No matter where you go, there you are.
#2

Icon_thumbup  Cool radio ! I look forward to hearing more about it. It looks like they used the kind of tubes with the shield coating on the glass.
#3

Nice radio Jayce. Let us know how it turns out.
It's funny how a seller will sit on an item for that long before finally lowering the price to where it has a chance to sell.
There was an majestic console radio here in a antique shop that sat there for about 2 years way over priced.
Then the last time I saw it they had lowered the price to $50.00 and it sold that week. Good luck.
#4

 That Majestic looks like it may be around 1932-33 vintage, so not quite at the end of the line for Grigsby-Grunow, believe it or not they actually did live long enough to switch over to using 6.3 volt tubes. Other then the pair of 4-S tubes, which look like they are double diodes, most of them are just metal spray shield versions of the second generation 2.5 volt type tubes as denoted by things like 58S or 2A7S.

http://www.nostalgiaair.org/pagesbymodel...008791.pdf

I'm not sure why they would have used two of those 4-S tubes, they use one diode in one tube for the AVC diode, and one diode in the other for a second detector, the plate on the second diode inside each tube is grounded. Although unlike something like a 6H6 both diodes in each tube share a common cathode, still this didn't stop manufacturers from using both diodes in a 75/6Q7. What I am wondering about is what could be used as a substitute for the 4-S tubes in on of these? A type 56 wired as a diode? I have a Sylvania tube manual from 1937 that has a section on Majestic tubes so I will have to see what the specs are and what may be subbed for one.
Regards
Arran




Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
91H Code 126 Restore
Just to make it more confusing here is another model 91 schematic that doesn't show parts with dotted lines in that spot...Arran — 10:37 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
The wires were desoldered from the can, and the capacitors checked. All checked at 0.102 uF, which is correct. So the c...morzh — 09:41 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Arran Yours probably then the H speaker, same as mine.morzh — 08:39 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; I would like to have a look at the speaker in my model 96, but the set is packed into a corner in the basement. ...Arran — 08:04 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
Thanks Arran, I'm convinced the power cord is good but have a nice repro plug for it. Would it be prudent to add a fus...RealRider — 07:28 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
As I was studying this schematic I was wondering what does this dotted line means?  I haven't traced it out yet. An o...RealRider — 07:22 PM
91H Code 126 Restore
When it comes to the cloth covered power cords, if they are not frayed, and are flexible, and if I can bend one without ...Arran — 06:21 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Could be. The central cylinder is OK, but the sides are...well. What's done is done. I wonder if some standard bobbine w...morzh — 06:02 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; As I was saying it doesn't look like they used much of a bobbin for the field coil, not like a Magnavox one wou...Arran — 05:49 PM
Atwater-Kent 84, restoration.
This AK84 was bought, I think, last fall. For a whopping $100. It has been, according to the seller, restored. As I go ...morzh — 05:48 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 5724 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 5723 Guest(s)
Avatar

>