Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12, 2025) x

Thread Closed

Speaker Replacement
#1

Hello everyone, this is my first post, but I’ve been reading and learning here for a while.  

I have decided to restore my 38-93 that belonged to my Grandparents, I imagine they bought it new.   I’ve had it for a non-working mantle piece for 25 years.
 I’ve been dabbling with electronics for a while, building stomp boxes and simple guitar amps for friends, but that is about the extent of my experience. This is my first tube radio and I’m completely addicted to working on it.  
I’ve spent hours mapping the chassis on paper, taking pictures identifying parts and making notes.
 Last night I got down to testing the resistance of the field coil and output transformer. According to the drawing (37-93) the field coil has an R of 1140Ohms and the output transformer has an R of 400Ohms.  I got no reading on either. Is this thing toast? Can they be re-wound? I would like to use this speaker since it’s the original if at all possible.
This is such a great site, I’ve already learned a ton of stuff I would have had a hard time learning otherwise.  Thanks in advance.


Attached Files
.pdf Model 37-93.pdf Size: 108.95 KB  Downloads: 554

"He has all the virtues I dislike and none of the vices I admire." — Winston Churchill
#2

Hiya Green and welcome!
Your spkr is toast sorry! Can replace it with a similar type, try an ad in the wanted section.
Or
Use a modern spkr replacing the FC with a choke or resistor. Then use a suitable matching transformer @ 7k to 8 ohms. I can go into more detail if you like.

GL
Terry

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got it!

Terry
#3

(08-17-2016, 05:15 PM)Radioroslyn Wrote:  Hiya Green and welcome!
Your spkr is toast sorry! Can replace it with a similar type, try an ad in the wanted section.
Or
Use a modern spkr replacing the FC with a choke or resistor. Then use a suitable matching transformer @ 7k to 8 ohms. I can go into more detail if you like.

GL
Terry

Thanks for the reply. I would love for you to go into more detail.

"He has all the virtues I dislike and none of the vices I admire." — Winston Churchill
#4

(08-17-2016, 08:35 PM)Greenhorn Wrote:  
(08-17-2016, 05:15 PM)Radioroslyn Wrote:  Hiya Green and welcome!
Your spkr is toast sorry! Can replace it with a similar type, try an ad in the wanted section.
Or
Use a modern spkr replacing the FC with a choke or resistor. Then use a suitable matching transformer @ 7k to 8 ohms. I can go into more detail if you like.

GL
Terry

Thanks for the reply. I would love for you to go into more detail.

Check PM box
tnx

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got it!

Terry
#5

Welcome to the Phorum!
Icon_wave
#6

Thank you. Icon_smile

"He has all the virtues I dislike and none of the vices I admire." — Winston Churchill
#7

Hello Everyone,

I found a possible replacement for the speaker for my 38-93, it’s from a 37-84.
The Output Transformers (32-7019) match, the Field Coils (36-3243) match, but the Voice Coils do not…..36-3014 for the 38-93 and 36-3157 for the 37-84. Can I use this speaker?
Any education is greatly appreciated.

"He has all the virtues I dislike and none of the vices I admire." — Winston Churchill
#8

Should work fine. Both set use the same output tube so it is a good match. The transformer matches the tube's plate impedance to the impedance of the VC. VC probably just has a different part number but the proper impedance.

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got it!

Terry
#9

I merged the thread with the original speaker thread to keep it all together.
#10

Thanks Terry, Thanks Bob.

"He has all the virtues I dislike and none of the vices I admire." — Winston Churchill




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 71 Code 125
Hello,  I am in need of a schematic for this radio. Mine has the three separate circular tube shields and a shadow me...dconant — 08:06 AM
Stromberg Carlson 1500 Squeal
And life just keeps getting more complicated.dconant — 07:57 AM
54C Complete Teardown/Rebuild
Hello Roy, here is this one sincerely Richardradiorich — 12:45 AM
54C Complete Teardown/Rebuild
Richard, Had grabbed it already but thank you just the same.  I find myself wanting to find some way to block out the...glyphmon — 12:03 AM
54C Complete Teardown/Rebuild
Hello roy, here is a link to the schematic . Sincerely Richardradiorich — 11:54 PM
54C Complete Teardown/Rebuild
Richard, The Silvertone 2014 also is a transformerless set, so I am incorporating a 1:1 600 ohm audio isolation transfo...glyphmon — 11:37 PM
Preliminary work on wife's Silvertone 2014
Did an alignment today which was interesting.  IF alignment went great, almost all was already spot-on.  Adjusting on th...glyphmon — 11:35 PM
54C Complete Teardown/Rebuild
The main problem with adding a Bluetooth input is that this set lacks a traditional power transformer to isolate it from...radiorich — 11:19 PM
54C Cabinet Refinish
I started stripping this cabinet before it got super chilly out because I knew I wasn't going to be able to work on ...glyphmon — 11:18 PM
54C Complete Teardown/Rebuild
While I'm waiting to wrap up the final steps on my wife's Silvertone 2014, I started disassembly on the next project.  O...glyphmon — 11:07 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 2963 online users. [Complete List]
» 2 Member(s) | 2961 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatar

>