Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

How to make a new dial cover tutorial
#16

NICE,,,NOW ,,you can sell them,,,GREAT
#17

Well....I still am willing to pay for Mark Palmquist's lenses vs DIM ones. At $20 shipped (I believe in Kutztown it was a bit less) for me it makes sense. He also makes glass ones. Plus the gaskets.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#18

Sell them? NAh, IT is .50 cents in plastic.. $20.00 each is a bit crazy....
The hard part is making the form but still.

Times I have been electrocuted in 2021
As of 1/01/2021
AC: 4 DC: 1
Last year: 6
#19

Flat-bottomed are easier. Then there are lenses, convex. Etc.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#20

Not trying to be critical, but is anybody else having trouble following this tutorial? I really would like to try this, but I get lost at step 6 where it says: "Then attach the cutout to the center". What is the "cutout", and to the center of what? In step 5, he refers to the cutout as the piece with the hole in it (the masonite-looking material in the picture). Is this the "cutout"? Doesn't look like it in the picture associated with step 6. Why would there be a need to attach it to the "center" of the other half-inch piece of material if the two half-inch pieces are roughly the same size? Does he mean attach the "insert", which is the term he uses for the quarter-inch material (the rounded-corner rectangle) in step 5?

It gets even worse for me in step 7, "bottom of the template", "base of the template", "top of the template", "bottom half"? Maybe too many terms for the same piece, or maybe I'm reading too much into it. The tutorial looks like it has a lot of potential if I could just get through steps 6 and 7. Anybody care to clarify?
#21

Hi Mark, welcome to the Phorum!
Icon_wave

Kirk (Oldrestorer) is on the Phorum a lot so I'm sure he'll be happy to help you figure it out.
#22

I hope the new pics help..
Thank you for questioning it. I need feedback to make it understandable..
Let me know if there is anything else...

Times I have been electrocuted in 2021
As of 1/01/2021
AC: 4 DC: 1
Last year: 6




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco Model 249 made in England
Thanks for the information MrFixr55.   It's tube amplification and not solid state. TOMfklown — 11:27 AM
Philco Model 249 made in England
Well, I’ll be! I learned something.jrblasde — 11:03 AM
Philco Model 249 made in England
Yes, Garrard was well-regarded for its standalones.morzh — 10:48 AM
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
Quite the interesting stories, sir! Somewhat reminds me of my first job out of school (not that I worked in a similar fi...jrblasde — 09:33 AM
Philco model 40-100
Arran, I restored 2 Canadian battery-crank telephones for a friend a while ago, a Northern Electric (Canadian version of...MrFixr55 — 08:04 AM
Road Trip for a Philco 46-480
Beautiful work, a 79 year old radio brought back to life. The first FM radios for me, a little iffy, had some I just cou...Jimradio — 08:01 AM
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
I was a field engineer for a biomedical company for many years. Many was the time that I was driving home from NYC in t...MrFixr55 — 06:40 AM
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
Don't laugh folks, I have not been above taking a chassis into the bathtub (when Ms. Fixr was out of the house), taping ...MrFixr55 — 06:02 AM
Philco model 40-100
Marion; By "newer style" carbon resistors do you mean the molded type with coloured bands rather then the BE...Arran — 01:00 AM
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
hello jrblasde , your radio sounds great well done !! I bought like 20 years ago a Philco 610b that someone had painte...radiorich — 11:50 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>