Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

38-15 Chairside Antenna
#1

Hi all,
I recently picked up a nice 38-15 Chairside and since the cabinet was nice, I just went through the chassis restoration.
(Recap, clean all contacts, replace out of tolerance resistors, new tubes as needed, complete alignment, etc.)

It works very well except that it apparently needs an outside antenna to properly receive weaker stations.

This is problematic for where I chose to put it. Are there any good internal antennas for these types of radios available? I could put in an RF amp, I suppose, but don't want to. It is certainly not as sensitive as many other 5 tube radios...and I also wonder if this is normal for the prewar tube types that it uses.
Anyone have a similar experience with similar models?

Thanks!
Rob

Schematic is here: http://www.nostalgiaair.org/Resources/do...013239.pdf


[url=https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B7nZyVR-b56DNG1GMnpVTVNjelE][/url]
#2

Hi Rob,
I've had a few of those style sets and have found them to have good sensitivity. Could have a weak tube or two. If you can't put up an outside ant a loop or active loop would be a good alternative. The type of building construction your in can diminish reception if it's something like steel and concrete.

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
#3

My 38-15 (the tabletop one), that has it's antenna pigtail and nothing else connected, even receives shortwave. Even in the basement. I'm with Terry, look for weak tubes. Especially the 6A7 pentagrid, it is known to have weak amplifying section (the oscillator is usually good) to the point of it being 1/4 to 1/5 value listed in the table. It will still work but the sensitivity will be diminished.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#4

Thanks guys!
Only the floor is concrete and steel. The main floor is frame. So with your info, I think there might really be an issue with it.
I remember testing the tubes and replacing a few, but now I don't remember which ones, or if I just did an emissions test or a Gm test. (Not that any tester is 100% reliable.)

I think I'll do some more tube testing and switching out. I'll post back with what happens after that.
Rob
#5

Hi Rob,

If swapping tubes doesn't make a difference you might check out this thread. Some of us have had very good luck with these antennas:

http://philcoradio.com/phorum/showthread.php?tid=16904

Greg V.
West Bend, WI
Member WARCI.org
#6

I doubt a loop antenna will do much if the signal is blocked in the first place. Cases like these call for external aerial.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#7

Thanks again you guys! I swapped the 6A7 for a tested and, apparently, N.O.S. tube. That made a huge improvement.
I then tested the original 6A7 on my (calibrated) Hickok 600A and it showed [?] on the pentode section.

Turned the english to 73 and that made the meter read Gm of about 600/1000 (average new tube).
The oscillator section was fine at nearly 500/300(" ").

Emission tests good, so I must have originally just done an emission test (or maybe enhanced emission test depending on who you believe) on my Jackson 648. I don't know how else I could have missed that marginal tube.

Also, I may try that tunable loop antenna!

Rob
#8

(09-06-2017, 07:56 PM)robsradioactive Wrote:  Thanks again you guys! I swapped the 6A7 for a tested and, apparently, N.O.S. tube. That made a huge improvement.
I then tested the original 6A7 on my (calibrated) Hickok 600A and it showed [?] on the pentode section.

Turned the english to 73 and that made the meter read Gm of about 600/1000 (average new tube).
The oscillator section was fine at nearly 500/300(" ").

Emission tests good, so I must have originally just done an emission test (or maybe enhanced emission test depending on who you believe) on my Jackson 648. I don't know how else I could have missed that marginal tube.


Rob

Yep. Very typical.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#9

The tunable loop from Eton, that is mentioned above, does work very well for BC use. They are pretty narrow banded, though, which makes DXing a little difficult. They are somewhat directional, as most loops are, that can be nice for nulling out interference. I frequently use one in my basement shop, where it is quite effective.

An out door wire is hard to beat, but these are a lot more portable and you don't have to worry about lightning protection, on the antenna, anyway.

CC Crain makes (or made) an amplified twin coil ferrite loop that works well for BC use too. It is very directional and sensitive. It does need to be powered, though.

Chris H
N9WHH
#10

I agree. An outdoor long-wire is hard to beat. But mine comes in through a jack in another room and attached to an S-20R. Also, last week we had some tree guys out to cut back some branches and they knocked it down with their "cherry picker"...so that's a ladder job before winter.

I am going to try a small tuned loop, just for kicks. I don't used the chairside for SW listening and pretty much always just listen to 640 AM around here when I use it at all. I started building a square loop yesterday. I'll post here how it works--if it works!   Icon_crazy 

Rob
#11

Well, so I built this for it and it actually works very well. I used 13 turns on a 10" x 10" frame and put a padder capacitor across it. The antenna impedance at 640 kHz turned out to be about 35 k ohms, and the 38-15 chairside measured about 22 k ohms at the same frequency. I called it good and didn't try any further Z match.
Meanwhile, I also discovered abandoned phone cable running horizontally around the outside of the house and right beneath the window behind the chairside. I tapped into that, and now it seems I don't need the tuned loop at all.
Go figure...

Rob

[Image: https://s26.postimg.org/w1rq2x3w9/Tuned_Loop.jpg]




Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Correct model 84 Ac plug an cord type
From what I read Philco went to using brown rubber power cords in 1936, so cloth was used in the 1935 and earlier models...Arran — 11:25 PM
Correct model 84 Ac plug an cord type
Hi Bruce, I have not worked on an 84, but in general, power cords for almost any radio prior to 1938 was cloth covered...MrFixr55 — 08:34 PM
Restoring Philco 38-14
OK, well, so after staring at the sch again, I realized the problem had to be the #12/12A padder. I put a scope on the o...morzh — 08:15 PM
Correct model 84 Ac plug an cord type
Hello Bruce, I mostly use brown far as my cloth powercords go ! Here is the plug that I have used bakelite Acorn style...radiorich — 08:05 PM
Correct model 84 Ac plug an cord type
Looking for as correct as can find the right Ac plug an the correct colored cloth line. Ive seen many old photos but mos...Bruce — 04:13 PM
Restoring Philco 38-14
Rod Two Y-caps make sense if you use them from L/N to the chassis; this is only makes sense in the transformer radios...morzh — 10:11 AM
Restoring Philco 38-14
Mike, I'm curious about a specific use of he Y cap. Lately I've seen a single cap across the power transformer primary. ...RodB — 09:01 AM
Restoring Philco 38-14
hello morzh , That sounds like a plan ! Sincerely Richardradiorich — 07:45 AM
Restoring Philco 38-14
Richard, It helped some, but I still had the whining when engaging the rear power strip (I did not realize it was fro...morzh — 07:07 AM
Restoring Philco 38-14
Hello morzh, Yes , that dreaded hum in my room where i do alighment I have my cable modem and router plus desktop plus ...radiorich — 11:25 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 4085 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 4084 Guest(s)
Avatar

>