Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco 46-250 code 125?
#1

Looking for advice.

I'm working on what I believe is a Philco 46-250 Code 125. That's whats on the cabinet label and the chassis. The schematics I found online are labeled as such. A couple of the tubes didn't match the schematic, but I understand that wasn't unusual post-war and the the rectifier and output tubes were replaced with equivalent tubes with different bases.

BUT there are other big differences when I looked under the chassis.

[Image: https://i.imgur.com/nsYVQIZ.jpg]

[Image: https://i.imgur.com/c9FjnqE.jpg]

The terminal strip the top arrow points at doesn't exist in the schematics I have. And while the schematics called for a twin 20 mfd filter cap, the radio I have had ENTIRELY different values. The Twin cap was a 50(red)/30(blue) and there was an entirely different (and unlisted) cap between the two arrows (a 40 mfd from the #1 pin of the 7C6 to the terminal strip.

[Image: https://i.imgur.com/hOdoCJj.jpg]

I'm sort of at a loss here......
#2

Are you sure you have the correct schematic? I would move the electrolytics somewhere less crowded if possible and put them on a terminal strip if you can. That chassis looks a bit crowded.
#3

Hi,
One of the reasons for the discrepancy in the diagram regarding the filters is the old version used a dynamic spkr were your set has a pm spkr. W/o the field coil the power requires more capacitance to remove the 60cy hum. You'll rarely see 50/30mf cap in a set w/a dynamic spkr unless in it a replacement w/what was on hand at the time.  Go with a pair of 47mf@160v. The blue beaver cap is a replacement from back in the '60s, remove, dispose, and ignore.

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry




Users browsing this thread:
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco Model 16 wiring question
Measure the voltages first, just in case.morzh — 02:19 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Haven't thought of Burgess batteries in a while Mr. Fixer. Boston Edison always used Burgess in their Bright Star yellow...Paul Philco322 — 02:17 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Thanks Sam. I'll let you know. I can probably scare some up from the local radio club.klondike98 — 02:07 PM
Philco 89 Code 123 Osc Coil
Hello,  I thought I would post my findings on my bad oscillator tickler coil. There were 27 turns on the outer coil b...dconant — 12:38 PM
Philco Model 16 wiring question
Thanks Morzh. So it appears I did wire it incorrectly and I have to switch the wires between pins 2 and 4.bobclausen — 09:24 AM
Philco 46-1209 strange behavior
No, it's not a problem, just during certain condition it could show up. Yes, an internal tube short could do that too. ...morzh — 09:13 AM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
You sound guys are never satisfied. :crazy: :clap:RodB — 09:10 AM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
I got some new ceramic octal tube sockets installed and also tried some different coupling caps.  The results:  The go...TV MAN — 08:42 AM
Philco 46-1209 strange behavior
I pulled the tube out and it's shorted from pin 1 to pin 2. I suppose that's the problem...sq65 — 08:12 AM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
bob  Nice work on battery . If you don't. Have terminals i have a few spares  Samsam — 02:12 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>