Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Quad 8 track output?
#1

Hello, been a while since I posted anything, havnt done to much with tubes for a while but thought maybe someone with a better electronics background could help out with a problem. Anyway,

I have always used a componant type 8 track deck with pre amp/line outs connected to a solid state amp. I want to replace it with a realistic quadraphonic player that only has amplified/speaker outs (has a 2 channel stereo option). Can I connect the deck via a voltage divider to drop the signal to line level without any damage to the output transistors, since it wouldnt have the 8 ohm speaker load? or would it be better to tap into the preamp portion of the circuit? Im hoping i can connect it without modifing the deck itself. 

Any input would be greatly appriciated, Thanks, Todd
#2

So the Radio Shack deck doesn't have a line level output for the 8 track player? I have a quad eight track/tuner/amplifier in storage, but it's a cheapish unit, it probably uses op amps or TO package transistors for the output. Do you need the quadraphonic function or just the standard stereo output? My inclination would be just to pick up a stand alone component style 8 track player, with a line level output, it's not like they are hard to find. To modify the Radio Shack unit is something you would need a schematic to do.
Regards
Arran
#3

I have a few stand alone 8t decks but i would like to install this one to play my 8 tracks and quad tapes, as you say, 8 track decks are everywhere but stand alone quad decks like this one, not so much.
#4

I think the best way to go would be to make new line outputs just before the standalone's volume controls, and then disconnect B+ from the preamp and output amp transistors, in effect killing the amplifier section. Otherwise you would need to have a load across your speaker terminals all the time, a waste of power. You would end up with a tape deck without the amplifier, which I believe is your goal. As Arran noted, however, you'll need a schematic.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#5

What would a quad 8 with line level outputs go for these days?

Steve
#6

Probably for whatever any two people were willing to pay, if anything, for an as is unit. I believe that there were some car stereos of the era that had quad sound, FoMoCo offered it in some of their cars, I'm not too sure about G.M or Chrysler though. Quadraphonic sound was an interesting idea, but in the end it really amounted to no more then a fad, the number of quad cartridges that I have run across I can count on one hand so not many people were buying them obviously. I have one and what it has is right and left channels like a normal stereo tape, but then it has a pair of right and left rear channels which was just the music with no lyrics, so basically it's an 8 track with half the programing of a regular 8 track. Like AM stereo it was one of those things where nobody got around to establishing an industry made standard.
Regards
Arran
#7

Arran, a quad was installed after market in a 1970 911 I purchased in 1985. It had several tapes with it and frankly I couldn't tell much about the four channel in that little car and doubted it even had enough speaker to handle four channels! In general standard tapes were not bad but in that car the sound of music was not special, the sound of the motor was sweeter!

A friend in need is a pest!  Bill Slee ca 1970.
#8

"then it has a pair of right and left rear channels which was just the music with no lyrics,"


Some, like what you are describing were called "discrete surround" while others were true surround, like Pink Floyd Dark Side of the Moon, one song (on the run I think) when the guy is running and breathing hard, he runs a circle around you on the quad which is pretty cool, another "true surround" i have is ccr gold but 90% are as you said just music minus the vocals on the rear speakers.




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 42-1008 conversion kit
I read about a kit to convert the variable speed changer in the Philco 42-1008 into a single speed unit.  That would rem...alangard — 09:30 PM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
Tim Well...a chassis is metal. Magnetic or not, it does not matter. A transformer has some hum to it. It is natural....morzh — 08:40 PM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
I thought the 83 tube was bad because it looked white but it tests strong. Blue gassy though. I checked the fuse, it was...martinj — 08:37 PM
Shadow Meter Bulb
Ross I am not sure what current limiting effect the incandescent provides. They are two different parts of the sch...morzh — 08:31 PM
12' Philco
Bob Thanks for that photo. I have been looking for it, and I cannot find anythinmg on the web. I forgot it was here...morzh — 08:29 PM
Shadow Meter Bulb
I think after all has been said, I will use the same bulb that is specified for the dial pilot light which is a #55. I ...georgetownjohn — 07:31 PM
12' Philco
There was also this Philco! klondike98 — 07:25 PM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
I expected a challenge and this is just part of it. But, it's also supposed to be fun, entertaining, informative and enj...TV MAN — 07:12 PM
Shadow Meter Bulb
Butting in here with a question. Since the shadow meter is connected directly to the 1st and 2nd I.F.'s wouldn't the met...RossH — 06:43 PM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
Mike, Tim; you are about to enter the twilight zone. Doo doo doo doo, doo doo doo doo This is something alright. I'm go...RodB — 06:26 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 4357 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 4356 Guest(s)
Avatar

>