Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco Transformer Cover
#1

I was wondering why Philco has a cover over the transformer on a 40-150 that I am working on?  I removed it and find a regular old transformer in nice shape I might add.  I was wondering if there was any real reason it is there?  I noticed some pictures of this same radio on the internet that show the cover removed and was thinking the thing would run much cooler exposed to the air.  I was surprised how small this transformer looks vs other radios I have worked on with a similar number of tubes.


Attached Files Image(s)
   

73's  Bob
#2

Just a guess, maybe used for extra shielding.
#3

They aren't really stressed all that much, most of the tubes used in the 40-150, 180, etc are 150 ma loctals rather then the usual 300 ma octals everyone else was using at the time, the exceptions being the #41 output tubes and the 84 rectifier, the B+ voltage was on the low side too, only about 180 volts on the power output tubes. Now why did they use that metal box? I don't know, but it obviously didn't hurt anything as most of this series of chassis still have their original power transformers, however the output transformers are usually dead on arrival if they haven't already been replaced.
Regards
Arran
#4

The OP also asked this question on ARF, and someone there speculated that the cover may have been for magnetic/electrostatic shielding.

Sounds reasonable to me, especially given the close proximity of the loop antenna to the transformer. This may be why the console versions didn't have the cover over the transformer - the loop antenna in the consoles was under the chassis, not directly behind it.

But this is another of those questions that can only be fully answered by dead Philco engineers. And dead men tell no tales, nor do they answer any questions.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#5

Yes some interesting replies,  seems like it was a fairly common practice with other manufactures of that time as well.

73's  Bob




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Haven't thought of Burgess batteres in a while  https://www.radionostalgia.ca/lib/Images/battery/us/burgess1D.jpgi ...Vlad95 — 03:50 PM
Philco Model 16 wiring question
Measure the voltages first, just in case.morzh — 02:19 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Haven't thought of Burgess batteries in a while Mr. Fixer. Boston Edison always used Burgess in their Bright Star yellow...Paul Philco322 — 02:17 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Thanks Sam. I'll let you know. I can probably scare some up from the local radio club.klondike98 — 02:07 PM
Philco 89 Code 123 Osc Coil
Hello,  I thought I would post my findings on my bad oscillator tickler coil. There were 27 turns on the outer coil b...dconant — 12:38 PM
Philco Model 16 wiring question
Thanks Morzh. So it appears I did wire it incorrectly and I have to switch the wires between pins 2 and 4.bobclausen — 09:24 AM
Philco 46-1209 strange behavior
No, it's not a problem, just during certain condition it could show up. Yes, an internal tube short could do that too. ...morzh — 09:13 AM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
You sound guys are never satisfied. :crazy: :clap:RodB — 09:10 AM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
I got some new ceramic octal tube sockets installed and also tried some different coupling caps.  The results:  The go...TV MAN — 08:42 AM
Philco 46-1209 strange behavior
I pulled the tube out and it's shorted from pin 1 to pin 2. I suppose that's the problem...sq65 — 08:12 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 1163 online users. [Complete List]
» 2 Member(s) | 1161 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatar

>