Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco 38-690 Candohm Resistor Wattages and values?
#1

One of the candohm resistors is bad in a Philco 38-690. The values are uncommon. Do you try to come within 20 percent of the original value? And how do you find the wattages of the resistors? The Philco part number is 33-3323 and there is another candohm whose Philco part number is 30-3324.

Thanks,
nv3g
Oscar
#2

I can look tonight what I bought for mine.
(PS. I never put them in - the original ones worked ok, but I bought them just in case).
You mean the ones in the Power/Amp chassis?

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#3

Yes, I have worked on several Philco radios in the past and the candohm resistors tend to go bad. I wanted to also see if there was some information on the wattage of each section.

Thanks,
nv3g
Oscar
#4

To figure out the wattage use Ohm's Law. Take the voltage that appears across the whole candohm resistor. Using Ohms law, you can find the current through the entire candohm, Total current = Total voltage / total resistance. This gives you the current that flows through the candohm. Since the sections are in series the current will be the same through each section. Now, using the formula, Wattage = Current x Current x Resistance, you can compute the wattage for each section. This will give you a value that is close enough for government work. I usually go twice the indicated wattage for the resistor minimum, it runs cooler that way.
#5

Mike,

The very reason the candohm is subdivided in sections is to get different voltages developed. Each section may be loaded in turn so the actual effective resistance of it will be smaller when loaded than the one you see listed. So the total voltage, although it does give you the total dissipation, will not necessarily give you each part's proportionate dissipation as the current is not the same throughout the whole resistor, at least in theory, if you use the listed values.

I did at some point the measurements. I might even have them listed in my 38-690 thread. (have to see if they are there)

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#6

I bought: (values are close ones from Mouser that are reasonable and not superexpensive)

225 ohm - 10W
147 Ohm - 3W
47 Ohm - 3W
960 ohm - 3W
370 Ohm - 3W
3200 Ohm - I think I bought two 1600 ohm 10W each (cheap)
2400 Ohm - 2x 1200 ohm 5W.

These are very conservative.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#7

I just looked at the schematic for this particular radio. As with others I have seen, the candohm is used to generate various bias voltages for different parts of the circuit. As such, the additional current drain caused by this will be so small that by using the method I described above, using double the indicated wattage or better for a safety margin, one should run into no real problem. It is the method I have used successfully in the past.
#8

If this helps, here are actual power dissipations calculated from my working candohms which I replaced for reliability.

Candohm 165

46 ohm section .22 Watts used 2 watt replacement
230 ohm section .88 Watts used 5 watt replacement
154 ohm section .54 Watts used 2 watt replacement

Candohm 163

970 ohm section .48 Watts used 2 watt replacement
370 ohm section .21 Watts used 2 watt replacement
2370 ohm section 1.78 Watts used 5 watt replacement
3200 ohm section 6.12 Watts used 25 watt chassis mount dale resistor

My candohms were slightly off but not enough to skew my calculations. I simply measured voltage drop and did calculations using known parameters of voltage and measured resistance. Hope this helps future restorations.

Tony

“People may not remember how fast you did a job, but they will remember how well you did it”




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Studebaker/Philco AC-2687 car radio
I have some car radio service manuals, Riders I think (not to be confused with the big blue binders), so I may see if on...Arran — 01:20 AM
Philco model 40-100
Greetings; Here is an update, I found a listing on fleabay for a similar chassis to yours, and it has a photo of what...Arran — 12:58 AM
Philco model 40-100
Greetings; I think I may have found a clue as to what is missing, from a search I made, there is a rear view of the c...Arran — 12:12 AM
Philco model 40-100
I recently acquired a Philco model 40-100 farm (battery) radio. The radio was in very good condition except the red on f...mhamby — 05:59 PM
Studebaker/Philco AC-2687 car radio
Hello, Richard the radio is an AC-2687 Studebaker model. The Philco model is S -5323 and the chassis p/n is S-5523Pdouglaski — 11:52 AM
48-482 rear panel help
The 48-482 is an AC only set as well, featuring a power transformer. While the transformer shouldn’t get “hot”, it is ye...jrblasde — 11:12 AM
Studebaker/Philco AC-2687 car radio
I gave a Chrysler/MoPar car radio from 1954, it was made by Philco, and it uses two chassis, one has the power supply an...Arran — 11:06 AM
48-482 rear panel help
Hello keithchip. You could make a hardboard back for the set, but make sure you provide plenty of ventilation holes in ...GarySP — 11:04 AM
Studebaker/Philco AC-2687 car radio
Welcome to the Phorum, Phil! Lots of friendly help here to assist you along the way! Take care, - GaryGarySP — 10:55 AM
Studebaker/Philco AC-2687 car radio
Hi Pdouglasti, Phirst off, welcome to the Philco Phorum, a Phamily Phriendly place phull of phun pholks and all things ...MrFixr55 — 07:37 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>