Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

An RCA 140
#1

Jayce mentioned the RCA 140 so I thought it would be interesting to show some photos of mine. Jayce - it only cost $50 (and about $50 shipping) but you can see why Icon_smile. They were poking fun at it on Usenet wondering what sort of sap would buy it.

[attachment=2]

[attachment=1]

[attachment=0]

It had suffered the "someone carried it by the top edge" syndrome and the top broke away and the rest is history. I was able to secure the top with dowel rod. It was a $50 gamble that all the pieces were there!
#2

Here's a pic of the completed radio.

[attachment=0]

Except for the top where refinishing was obviously required it still has its ORIGINAL finish! Its a wonderful radio and one of my favorites.

-Bill
#3

WOW! Icon_eek That is beautiful! Congratulations on another fine save, Bill! Icon_smile

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#4

Thanks, Ron.
#5

Now that's impressive, and with the original toner on the front, no one is going to question the top.
#6

Done a outstanding job. All the sets i get are rough as a cobb. But that is why i get them when i get through wow look at the difference.
I did that . Icon_wink
#7

Wow! That is a great job on that radio! The guy I bought my 140 off of had a little Simplex that he wanted $150, that was in pieces and had the back of the cabinet damaged by being carried from the top. I decided on the 140 instead, though it wasn't cheap. Odd thing about my 140: it has a servicing stamp on it from Aug. 25th, 1945. During that time, it appears they completed rebuilt the chassis and redid it for all 6 volt tubes in the original sockets! Possibly the power transformer was dead and wartime limitations left them with only 6 volt transformers? A friend of mine has seen this done before on wartime radios. The question is: to restore fully to original or leave the wartime modification in there? Looks original until you look at the numbers on the tubes themselves. Icon_confused

No matter where you go, there you are.
#8

Thanks, Alan. Actually the top doesn't look half bad either but you can spot the dowel ends if you know where to look.

[attachment=1]

Jayce, If I understand you correctly they simply used the 6 volt equivalents and not replacement octal types? I could live with that. What did they use for an audio output tube?

Here's what I found under the RF deck of mine.

[attachment=0]

Pulling out the RF deck is a bit of a chore. I wonder why they had to do it TWICE?
#9

The radio was using a 6a6 for an output in place of the type 53. It's basically a six volt type 53. Pinout is the same and everything. Sadly, the question to keep this radio six volt or not has been rendered moot. The input transformer or power transformer is shot and will need to be replaced. Since I will be getting the same transformer for mine and the repair guy who also has a chassis like mine, we will be going back to the 2 volt type. What is it about some models of radios and their eating transformers? This one was replaced in 1945, so one would have thought it would be good, but it is shot. And this type of RCA chassis does seem known for bad transformers. Icon_sad

No matter where you go, there you are.
#10

That looks real good . One radio on my wanttttttttt list
#11

What a wonderful save. Bill, you certainly got the last laugh! Icon_lol
I saw one of these locally for sale. It appears to be complete and in good to fair condition. Are these rare? What is a reasonable price range?

Thanks,

Allen
#12

I wouldn't say they are rare but they seem to fetch prices as if they were. Ungoofed up ones on ebay recently have sold for numbers like 400-600 which seems really too much to me. If you can get it for 200-300 that sounds more realistic.
#13

And beware the power transformers in these sets. Seems like the radios I run into with this chassis around my area always seem to have dead transformers. That and they are a bear to rebuild with the way they are built. Actually, I should have left mine sit a bit longer before taking it up to be rebuilt. I need to get my butt in gear now and get a transformer for it.

No matter where you go, there you are.
#14

Matter of factly, there are a few interesting idiosyncracies about the 140 family of RCA sets. I've had several, and have a few, just now.

They're usually seen as the 140; a 4 band set, and the last one of the RCA deep chassis radios. They were made as a 5 band model, with the 140-410KC band added. Those sets were known as 140-E, and AVR-1. One model (140-E?) had a rather handsome art-deco inspired case (a table model). The set also appeared as an AVR- (?) forgot, It was made for, and used in airport towers. I've never known of one for sale....dangit!

The set was a very hot radio. For the SW bands, an extra RF stage (58) was switched in. Indeed, the tube types had 6 volt equivalents, for direct conversion. If you'd want, there are even direct octal equivalents. The 53 became 6A6 (both fat pin), then 6N7G (octal).

The power transformer had dual primaries on all models, which made them a 240 Volt set, if you wanted. I haven't heard of burned out power transformers, but somebody is gonna have one sooner or later! The biggest bugaboo on those sets is an open speaker field. the field is 6950 ohms, and is open, lots of times. The field is connected directly across the 300 volt output of the 80. This is because the 53 is a class B power amplifier, and the B+ current is all over the map, so it wasn't practical to use the field in series with the power supply. A PM speaker can replace the speaker directely, and forget about the field.

The killer part of this set is the big coil rack in the chassis. If you're going to re-cap the set, the coils have to come out....with their 23 leads, to unsolder, and replace. Don't work on one of these sets with small children present.

But, in spite of all that, it's a terrific radio.
#15

I have to add a correction to my previous post. It is the INPUT transformer that seems to be problematic with the sets found around here. Both mine, and my friend's 140's both have dead input transformers and so far that are proving to be a bit of a headache to find. Hopefully we will get the radios going before Christmas. Thanks for the additional info, very interesting about the 140 line of RCA and GE radios. My friend's is the 140 chassis in a GE console.

No matter where you go, there you are.




Users browsing this thread:
[-]
Recent Posts
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Philco 16 is not intimidating at all. Despite being an 11-tuber. 37-116 is indeed intimidating. 16 has good space unde...morzh — 04:11 PM
48-482 rear panel help
Thanks for the responses Gary and Bob. I'm a little surprised that there's no back panel - although I know older Philco'...keithchip — 04:09 PM
48-482 rear panel help
Gary is correct, there was not a rear panel on the 48-482. I restored one of those and its a great sounding radio that ...klondike98 — 03:24 PM
The list of my radio & TV collection!
A little light positivity in our feed... To nostalgic retro music... With English subtitles My new video on the contin...RadioSvit — 02:14 PM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Ron and Mike I mentioned a 2 meg resistor not on the schematic. I stumbled on a changes note in Riders that mentioned th...dconant — 12:02 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Here you go: Your the code 125Radioroslyn — 11:12 AM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Hi Ron, Thanks for the input. I think I'm going to call it good enough. It does seem weird I can usually dial in othe...dconant — 08:01 AM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Welcome, the radio looks intimating 11 tubes, wish you well.Jimradio — 07:49 AM
462ron
Hi Dan, it’s been 10 years since I restored the electronics on my 37-116 so I’m going on some foggy memories. I remember...462ron — 07:37 AM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Yes the 16B as morzh pointed out. Specifically its the January 1935 model version of the 16B. There are a couple earli...klondike98 — 11:51 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 2131 online users. [Complete List]
» 2 Member(s) | 2129 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatar

>