All wave and High efficiency antennas
Posts: 1,277
Threads: 44
Joined: Nov 2017
City: Menlo Park
State, Province, Country: CA
Hi Folks,
Thought I would ask here. I am putting together some information for another publication, The Lowdown which is the journal of the Long Wave Club of America. There has been discussion of low noise antennas, the history of which traces back to the 1930s and the emergence of short wave receivers. Interested by this I have been trawling American Radio History, and patent sites to glean more about the beginnings of the technique. This quickly brought up a Philco angle, in the form of the "All Wave" and "High Efficiency" antennas.
If anyone here knows more about these, and when they were marketed, I would be very interested to learn more. They seem to fit the low noise/anti interference description, having coupling transformers at the antenna and receiver, and a balanced shielded twin line feeder. I nearly bought one on ebay a couple of weeks ago, but it went for more than I was willing to pay for such a collectors item.
30's publications show references to several similar systems by Kolster Brandes, CorWiCo, Belling and Lee (UK) and a few others. To me it is an interesting, and still relevant subject - modern or antique receivers can still benefit from very similar configurations.
Thanks in advance,
Ed
I don't hold with furniture that talks.
Posts: 658
Threads: 8
Joined: Apr 2018
City: S. Dartmouth
State, Province, Country: MA
Fact is: That antenna to be most efficient must be resonant. That does not work well for a general coverage receiver. A resonant antenna will have a specific impedance at the feed point that is or can be made to match common feed line. Matched to a feedline that line is resistant to interference. A matching device at the receiver for the line impedance must also be broadband...
There are commercial receiver antennas that will do this. The issue would be matching at the receiver.
The overall antenna as a system will be noise free all along the feedline but not at the antenna. Noise can still enter there.
FWIR RCA used a design called the spider web antenna. A delta matched dipole that was feed by 72 ohm twisted pair. One such model did not need the heavy center balun (heavy as it was in a porcelain housing). The "normal feed impedance of a dipole is 72 ohm, the feed line can be a pair of 14-18 ga. stranded, insulated wire twisted 1 turn in two inches.
Some 30's - 40's era radios included provision for the balanced antenna. Ready for such a feedline. The Delta system has several extended legs that assist in managing the shortwave bands. For BC overall, the antenna serves as loading and the feedline does some reception if one leg is connected to ground.
IMHO the use of baluns for BC will introduce loss and unexpected resonances. I think a more than adequate BC/shortwave antenna is an easy afternoon project costing only for the wire & insulators.
Do not neglect the lightning protection, can be homemade.
YMMV
Chas
Pliny the younger
“nihil novum nihil varium nihil quod non semel spectasse sufficiat”
Posts: 816
Threads: 25
Joined: Mar 2014
City: Louisville, KY
". . . the feed line can be a pair of 14-18 ga. stranded, insulated wire twisted 1 turn in two inches."
I think this topic could (and should) easily occupy a category of it's own. I have about 100 questions about it.
Posts: 1,277
Threads: 44
Joined: Nov 2017
City: Menlo Park
State, Province, Country: CA
Chas,
Thanks for the detail. I know in general about antennas, and the efficiency that comes through resonance. Receive is a bit more forgiving than transmitting, but the principles still hold of course.
I found one article that IIRC showed how one of the designs (not Philco I believe) flattened out the response curve.
The other articles I found indicate that the intention was that the antenna could be placed outside, and the balanced lead-in could approach the house without picking up the near field interference from domestic wiring etc. like a simple long-wire would have done. The designs also helped prevent the radio from conveying wiring noise out to the antenna.
This is indeed something that could be a thread all its own, because the isolation methods using transformers do still work brilliantly, especially in keeping the antenna and house wiring separate.
Cheers
Ed
I don't hold with furniture that talks.
Posts: 13,776
Threads: 580
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Ferdinand
State, Province, Country: Indiana
Chas Wrote:Do not neglect the lightning protection, can be homemade.
I would like to hear more about this. Never heard of homemade lightning protection before. I'm currently using a lightning arrestor intended for an electric fence. If there is a better way, I'd like to know...
--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
Posts: 1,277
Threads: 44
Joined: Nov 2017
City: Menlo Park
State, Province, Country: CA
Ron - I've seen a few implementations while reading through the 1930's
One is to use an automotive spark plug, grounding the body, and connecting the antenna wire to the center electrode. The gap can be narrowed (a lot) although I have not seen this mentioned.
Another is to use a Neon bulb - they act quickly and have a striking voltage ~ 70 V. One of my newer receivers, made by Icom, has just such a feature, soldered directly to the antenna socket just inside the radio's chassis.
Still another is to use two stacks of fast recovery diodes, wired in opposite polarity across antenna and earth. Two or more are usual, allowing for higher real signal voltages before the diodes themselves cause spurious signals through intermodulation. Lots of modern comms receivers use this approach.
Quick google images search on the subject
P.S. Anything on All-Wave or High Efficiency Antennas?
Cheers,
Ed
I don't hold with furniture that talks.
(This post was last modified: 03-24-2020, 02:28 PM by EdHolland.)
Posts: 5,060
Threads: 269
Joined: Nov 2012
City: Bandon
State, Province, Country: OR
Here are some threads discussing all wave and HE antennas
https://philcoradio.com/phorum/showthrea...t=all-wave
The link is no longer active but the wayback archive has it:
https://web.archive.org/web/200603281526...0-6112.htm
Posts: 1,277
Threads: 44
Joined: Nov 2017
City: Menlo Park
State, Province, Country: CA
Thank you Bob
I don't hold with furniture that talks.
Posts: 1,400
Threads: 70
Joined: Oct 2007
City: Linn Creek, MO
Quote:I would like to hear more about this. Never heard of homemade lightning protection before.
A sparkplug can be used as a lightning arrestor.
Steve
M R Radios C M Tubes
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
|
Recent Posts
|
Cannot Adjust an IF Transformer’s cores
|
The abilities of our 'Phorum Pholks" never ceases to amaze me! Fantastic fabrication, Joseph! I'm waiting now for...GarySP — 08:27 PM |
PT-6 antenna connections
|
Thanks. I never realized that was a notch noted in the schematic as described. I’ll recheck my wiring.bridkarl — 08:13 PM |
Cannot Adjust an IF Transformer’s cores
|
Thank you! I was quite new to the Phorum when I started this post, so I feel like it might be advantageous to publish a ...jrblasde — 08:07 PM |
PT-6 antenna connections
|
Notice in the schematic the notch at the bottom of the antenna coil is between pins 3 & 4.
Yes, pin 6 of the 7C6 is...RodB — 07:34 PM |
bridkarl
|
I have two PT-6 chassis. On both there is a blue wire that runs from the above chassis transformer to pin 6 of 7C6. So t...bridkarl — 07:23 PM |
Cannot Adjust an IF Transformer’s cores
|
Joseph, now you are an engineer!!RodB — 06:37 PM |
PT-6 antenna connections
|
Hi, reading your explanation I can see the confusion. If you take it one connection at a time it should result in a desi...RodB — 06:34 PM |
Cannot Adjust an IF Transformer’s cores
|
It works! I received the PCBs this morning in the mail, and put everything together. I reused the base from the original...jrblasde — 04:32 PM |
PT-6 antenna connections
|
I seem to have lost my way on this PT-6.
I see the antenna aerial transformer schematic - I’m reading pins 1 through ...bridkarl — 12:30 PM |
40-150 General questions
|
Good thing you're a good electrician ... the pictures show a lot of rewiring in your future! Take care and BE HEALTHY!...GarySP — 11:52 AM |
Who's Online
|
There are currently 3640 online users. [Complete List] » 2 Member(s) | 3638 Guest(s)
|
|
|
![>](https://philcoradio.com/phorum/images/bootbb/asb/right_arrow.png)
|