Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12, 2025) x

Thread Closed

FM 100
#1

Listening to a Zenith from about 1950, band switch sez AM, then FM100. So why say FM 100, I have no other sets that have that mark. Ideas? Paul

Tubetalk1
#2

I'm listening to a Zenith 7H820.  This one has both the old FM band and the "new" one.  The old one is labeled FM 42, the new is labeled FM 100.  Perhaps yours is a carry over from older radios and people who remembered the old band.
#3

Maybe when the FM band went up in frequency and crossed 100MHz, they referred to it as FM100 to distinguish between the old and the new ones?

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#4

I am not that old that I remember old bandIcon_smile. Paul

Tubetalk1
#5

Zenith made several models in 1940s, my Spinet being one of those, with the old FM.
Dials were marked in numbers, not MHz.
I guess, once they migrated to the modern one, they tried to avoid confusion.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#6

These little Armstrong FM sets sound pretty good regardless. Paul

Tubetalk1
#7

I'm probably wrong:

"FM-42" designation is the first FM band beginning at 42Mhz, the band being obsolete many years. Incidentally some receivers were marked as "channels"...

"FM-100" is the current band, containing 100mhz. So, in simple terms the names are not identically representative of what they are.

Chas

Pliny the younger
“nihil novum nihil varium nihil quod non semel spectasse sufficiat”
#8

Our 1947 Zenith Console has both FM bands. IIRC the bandswitch indicator designates these FM 45 (may be 42) and FM 100. It reflects the frequency range for each, as pointed out before. The tuning dial on that radio is marked in frequency units for each band.

This also reflects the changes in radio that were happening at the time, and the battle for control of the commercial airwaves taking place between some of the technology's most notable figures.

I don't hold with furniture that talks.
#9

Thanks for all the feedback....no pun. Paul

Tubetalk1




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
It's the other forum. I'm also in DIY, but mostly read there. Honestly, I kinda jumped into this without much thought to...TV MAN — 10:43 AM
Philco 71 Code 125
Hello,  I am in need of a schematic for this radio. Mine has the three separate circular tube shields and a shadow me...dconant — 08:06 AM
Stromberg Carlson 1500 Squeal
And life just keeps getting more complicated.dconant — 07:57 AM
54C Complete Teardown/Rebuild
Hello Roy, here is this one sincerely Richardradiorich — 12:45 AM
54C Complete Teardown/Rebuild
Richard, Had grabbed it already but thank you just the same.  I find myself wanting to find some way to block out the...glyphmon — 12:03 AM
54C Complete Teardown/Rebuild
Hello roy, here is a link to the schematic . Sincerely Richardradiorich — 11:54 PM
54C Complete Teardown/Rebuild
Richard, The Silvertone 2014 also is a transformerless set, so I am incorporating a 1:1 600 ohm audio isolation transfo...glyphmon — 11:37 PM
Preliminary work on wife's Silvertone 2014
Did an alignment today which was interesting.  IF alignment went great, almost all was already spot-on.  Adjusting on th...glyphmon — 11:35 PM
54C Complete Teardown/Rebuild
The main problem with adding a Bluetooth input is that this set lacks a traditional power transformer to isolate it from...radiorich — 11:19 PM
54C Cabinet Refinish
I started stripping this cabinet before it got super chilly out because I knew I wasn't going to be able to work on ...glyphmon — 11:18 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 3996 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 3995 Guest(s)
Avatar

>