Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

"37 & '38-116 tube shield compliment
#16

It appears that both the 37-116 and 38-116 use 11 tube shields. The 37-116 service info does not show a shield over the 6J5 1st audio tube, but I think it does have one. I no longer own any 37-116 or 38-116 models so can't check for myself.

Now as to the tube complement. Short answer is no - the 1938 tube lineup would not be used, nor would they work properly, in the 37-116 without some modifications.

Discriminator - 6H6G dual diode in the 37-116, 6J5G triode connected as a diode in the 38-116 with two 6J5 tubes being used instead of a single 6H6G.

AVC - Both use 6J5G tubes, but in different positions (compare the service information).

1st Audio - 6J5G in the 37-116, 6R7G in the 38-116. The 6R7G is a dual diode-triode, with a grid cap. The 6J5 has no grid cap. A 6J5 could be used in place of a 6R7G with some modification.

Now as for the RF unit: As mentioned previously, the 38-116 Code 121 uses the 1937 RF unit, with the same tube lineup (6N7G, 6A8G, 6L7G, 6K7G). 38-116 Code 125 uses a different RF unit with the following tubes: 6N7G, 6A8G, 6A8G, 6U7G.

6K7G is a substitute for 6U7G.

But 6L7G and 6A8G do not substitute for one another as they are configured differently.

Finally, let's mention the audio output tubes. Most 37-116 models use 6B4G triodes; 38-116 models use 6L6G pentodes.

Most 37-116 models are Code 122 (with automatic tuning, 6B4G output tubes). Some are Code 121 (conventional 1937 round dial, no automatic tuning, 6B4G outputs). But there are also Codes 125 and 126 that use 6A5G triode output tubes. No schematic that I am aware of exists for these two variants, although these codes are mentioned in the 1946 Philco Quick Selector Parts Directory.

Confused enough already?

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#17

Now if only I could find a 37 or a 38-116 to play with, I like the idea of a good front end with a good power output stage. It's a shame that Philco didn't get into building and marketing communication sets, they could have taken any chassis from a 650 on up (maybe even a 620) and taken a decent chunk of the ham market. I even have a post war magazine article recommending several pre war Philco and RCA models for a bargain basement receiver.
Regards
Arran
#18

Ron,

Thanks So Much for taking the time out to post that info for this noob. I didn't really think a '38 tube compliment would work either but I haven't pulled both those chasisses & compare side by side & don't know enough yet to *compare* schematics side by side.

In the last 3 months feeling pretty good about my schematic reading & measures, to the radio itself. Came along a lot faster than I thought I would in little over a year of actually being a "fixer" now, instead of a "parts changer" Icon_lol Especially with yours & Mr. Goller's help.

39-19s fixed & ready to align. 66MB next(open coil suspect). 650 "white elephant"(faint volume) after that, then to that 16B cathedral(no escutcheon yet) with that NICE K-17 speaker someone Icon_rolleyes supplied me with. Icon_biggrin

BTW, saw your photos of the 655, Nice Job.

Thanks Ron for ALL your help you have given me so far,
Lloyd




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
New Philco Repair Bench
I am sure this is the archive, and not the Chuck's site.morzh — 09:50 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
It's not like we are good friends with that wire and can tell it from other ptetty identical looking wires. Why'n't you...morzh — 09:49 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
I'm not sure why that wire wasn't covered in the video. I'm pretty sure the 6A8 won't work until that pin is grounded. Y...RodB — 09:47 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
You'll have to forgive me, I am not sure what you mean.  Can you explain what you are really saying.  If anyone does not...georgetownjohn — 08:05 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Those are details better left to the ones who know. Maybe you disconnected the wrong end of the wire.RodB — 06:22 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Maybe this is starting to make some sense in my hard head.  Is this why the wire in question was not in the great Ron Ra...georgetownjohn — 04:34 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
I was correct with the 6A8 pin connection's, 7 and 8 are connected to ground as well as the tube shield (the broken line...RodB — 02:41 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
What does the dotted line representing that surrounds the tube in the schematic?georgetownjohn — 02:17 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Hello John, I have been there either label got lost or was not labeled ! Sincerely Richardradiorich — 02:15 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Sorry, it is a Philco 37-640.  Does that help?--Johngeorgetownjohn — 02:14 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>