[radiorich]

Hello morzh,
man that set is got dusty chassis and it is funny that dial looks like the same style that is on my Zenith model 755 .

that chasis is the size of one their early Tv's and I bet it weights like one too.

One thing I like about bakelite blocks you can easly hide your new capacitors and they are fairly easy to do .
The cabinet looks in fairly good shape thou.

Sincerely Richard

[morzh]

First and foremost, this chassis is a back-breaker.
Then, it has that big capacitor block, which I hate, and which is the 3rd one I am dealing with (111 and 86 were the first two, and I still have not defeated the latter).

I never have seen a schematic with so many discrepancies between it and other schematics (like I said, I see 3 versions now, the one in our repository, and two (earlier and later) in Riders, and this is without the fact the Nostalgia version has no values in it).
I still have no parts list from any of the document. Maybe someone knows where it is.
And I wonder why Rider's made a piecemeal out of it, having 1-sheet sch in 1st book, the chassis photo in another, and the alignment procedure in yet another one.

I had no such problem with 111, 112 or the 86.


The Philco was modified during the Philco times, or at least by some Philco repairman.
All parts used in repairs/mods are Philco, and are time-appropriate. That 5K resistor on the capacitor block that should be 13K: yesterday I de-soldered it, and the soldering was as factory as it gets.
Also, there is an original tubular Philco 0.015uF cap (200V; I would use at least 400V at the time) that is not on the sch, not in the chassis' photo, but is soldered from one of the AC line wires to the chassis (a Y-cap).


I checked the volume pot; it is bad. End-to-end is a few Megaohms. I believe I changed it in 111; I will have to do the same here.
The tone control...well, I have tons of experience rebuilding these (it is yet to be dealt with).

[morzh]

Today finished resistors (Mouser came) and tone control.

The tone control in 96 is the same as in all similar radios: 95, 111, 112 and even 90.
Unlike the metal version, this one does not allow to pull or push the caps compartment out, so it had to be picked out after some heating. Not bad at all.

I was able to reuse the wires that went from the contacts to the caps.

The tone ctl was dirty. I took it apart, as I knew I would have to clean the contacts.
   
   

Then pried out the caps.
   

Cleaned the case and the contacts
   

Then prepared the assembly from three caps: 15nF, and 2x10nF.
   

As I said, I was able to re-use the wiring. I lined the bottom with fish paper. Even though the case is backelite and there is no fear of the case shorting things out. Just felt right.
   

Made a cap from fishpaper, to keep hot glue from damaging film caps. Yes, I know, some folks here stated this is safe to pot them directly, but then it costs me nothing and puts my mind to ease. I also used eraser on my pencil to clean the contacts a bit more, as somehow my usual method, IPA, did not clean all of the deposits. Then washed with IPA again, as rubber, if not washed off silver, will blacken it over long term due to the sulfur present in it.
   
   

Then I potted.
   

This is the Tone Control

   
   

And installed it back.
   

[Arran]

How did I miss this thread? I own a model 96 (lowboy cabinet), Mike is fixing up a model 96 and I didn't notice until today even though the thread started on January 12. With regard to the speaker in mine, the field coil is good but I think the audio output transformer is not, as usual the audio interstage went bad, and was replaced decades ago, but the Hamond replacement went bad also. I think that the main difference between a model 95 and a model 96 is that the latter incorporated an early form of AVC/AGC, which is pretty good for a 1930 model TRF set.
Regards
Arran

[morzh]

Arran

As far as I could tell, there's no such difference between 95 and 96.
They are essentially the same radio, and the differences are minor.

96 has tone control, 95 does not.
95 has long distance switch, 96 does not.
Schematics-wise, this is it.

Otherwise, 96 used backelite capacitors, and the 95 used tubular capacitors.

[Radioroslyn]

The speaker plugs are different...

[morzh]

Yes.

Both speakers are G-type, but 96 has the same type as 20/90, and 95 has the older style, rectangular that plugs on top of the chassis (well, they both are on top).

But I was talking about circuit differences only.

Because there is also difference of the dials (brass/plastic (celluloid)) and such.

[morzh]

Have just found Ron's responce to mg34.42 from 2022.


"Ok. Differences:

Model 95 has a brass dial scale, illuminated from above; Model 96 has a tan celluloid dial scale, illuminated from behind.
Model 95 has a two position local-distance switch; Model 96 has a four position tone control.
Model 95 uses the 1928-29 cylindrical capacitors under the chassis; Model 96 uses Bakelite block capacitors.
(I think) Model 95 uses the older 1929 speaker connector with four pins spaced wide apart - a large rectangular plug; Model 96 uses the "newer" speaker connector which is the same as used on 1931 Philcos such as models 70, 90, 112, etc. - a round plug with four pins spaced closely together, much like a 4-pin tube base, only with one large pin.

And that's about it. Icon_smile They are otherwise the same. "

[radiorich]

Hello morzh,
That is good to know !!

Sincerely Richard

[morzh]

Found another typo in Ray's capacitors book.

The cap between lugs 5 - 11, the one connecting the centertap to GND, is shown 0.15uF.
In all sch it is 0.015uF, and is also the same in 95 and 111 sch.
I took the cap meter to it, as most caps kept their functionality, with capacitances going 2x up, so 2uF would be 3.5uF, 0.5uF goes to 1uF and so on. This cap went to 0.04uF, eventually going just under 0.1uF; this tellsl me the 0.15uF value is the correct one.