Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco 643 restoration
#1

I already have a thread going in the cabinet restoration forum but figure I'd start this one for the electronics.

This tombstone came with a chassis heavily modified for AC operation. Every socket had been replaced to accommodate different tubes and some new ones were even added. Tube were also missing and I gave up on trying to restore it. Out of the blue, someone tipped me off the a 643 chassis on ebay and I won it Icon_smile

Here they are side-by-side.

[Image: http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6139/5919...9776_z.jpg]

[Image: http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6021/5919...180b_z.jpg]

That left the speaker. Just a few weeks later I spied this Philco 624 speaker on the same auction site with no bids. I ended up winning it for all of $ 0.99.
[Image: http://www.bobandersen.com/images/philco...peaker.jpg]

Only problem is that it arrived looking like this Icon_sad
[Image: http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6147/5983...c8d6_z.jpg]

[Image: http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6004/5983...3f3f_z.jpg]

Luckily, a little fabric glue fixed it up and when I tested it in another set it sounded just fine Icon_smile
[Image: http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6030/6009...6d59_z.jpg]
#2

Nuts! The 32-7472 audio output transformer is open on one side of the center tapped primary Icon_evil

I find it curious that the schematic specifies that it's mounted on the speaker frame but mine is mounted on the chassis. It's also depicted mounted on the chassis in Philco service bulletin No. 226.

I also noticed that it was soldered in crudely. Perhaps it was already replaced or someone tried to repair it ?

I suppose I could try melting out the tar and look for the break Icon_crazy
[Image: http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6002/6010...71803e.jpg]

[Image: http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6018/6010...937422.jpg]


Luckily, the speaker I picked up just happens to have a good 32M-9248 output transformer mounted on it's frame. So I'll try using that, but it would be nice to find a good 32-7472 someday.

Who knows maybe I'll find one at the ARCI swapfest later today ?
#3

Did you notice the date on that transformer? "11-39." It was made in November 1939, roughly four years after your 643 was built, so that transformer is a replacement unit. That would explain the crude soldering you mentioned.

Hmmm. Unusual...not unheard of for an audio output to fail that soon in a set's life, but unusual...

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#4

I feel your pain re: the speaker. I came across a complete AK 318 chassis/speaker, I needed the speaker for my 318 console. The seller shipped them loose in a box with 6- 4"X 6" plastic "bubbles" to pad them. Speaker was trashed, chassis damaged......
#5

Unfortunately, some eBay sellers are clueless and/or don't give a rat's behind about proper packaging. As long as they get that money in their hot little hands, that seems to be all that matters to them.

Recently, when I have had occasion to win a speaker on eBay, I have contacted the seller and requested them to package the speaker as follows:

Get a large piece of cardboard, and lay the speaker face down in the middle of this cardboard.

Fold the cardboard over the back of the speaker, cutting the cardboard as necessary, until the speaker is tightly encased inside this cardboard "cocoon."

Then place this inside a suitable box with at least two inches of packing material completely surrounding the cardboard-encased speaker.

I have found this is the best way to ship speakers.

Bubble wrap is too flimsy to reliably protect a speaker, and just tossing the speaker into a packing peanut bath will guarantee a destroyed cone. Cardboard works every time.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#6

Thanks for the great tips!

This seller put chunks of foam in a box, placed the speaker cone down against it and piled on more foam. Of course, the foam chunks tore right through the cone.

Ah, I hadn't realized that was a date code on the output transformer. So it seems both the original and the replacement failed. I sure hope the one on the speaker doesn't burn out too!
#7

I started using Ron's technique after I recieved a speaker from him. It's simple and bulletproof.

Yep. Emulation is the best form of flattery.
#8

I'm slowly making progress on the chassis. I discovered that the audio coupling transformer is also a replacement but tests OK. The same cannot be said of the antenna coil though Icon_sad

[Image: http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6183/6106...ecdd_z.jpg]

What I find really strange is that every tap of this coil is open. Someone had connected a low ohm flexible resistor from one tap to ground. I assume that was an attempt to restore reception.

Surprisingly, the antenna coil in the modified chassis is good. So I have the option of repairing this one or swapping it out. Either way, it's not going to be fun. So many connections to deal with ...
#9

Could be the result of a lightning strike, that is the reason for many bad antenna coils.

If it is the same item, why not replace it? Sounds like the path of least resistance, so to speak...
#10

As Tom said, if the antenna coil in your parts set is good, might as well swap them out and be done with it.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#11

I was thinking lightening strike too. I'll pull them both out and see what the condition they're in.

My concern was that the good coil might go bad too from age. I restored a Philco 60 recently and ended up rewinding come coils.
#12

The coils in the larger 1936 Philco models seem to be exceptionally well built, and appear to have avoided the use of the nitrocellulose insulation that breaks down with age, causing the winding directly above it (and sometimes, the winding below it) to corrode and fail.

In all of the years I've been working on radios, I've only had to replace one of those coils. It was either an antenna or an RF coil in a model 620 or 630.

I'm not saying they will last indefinitely - who knows how long they will last - but they do not seem to suffer from the issues that the older coils do. As an example, it should be considered standard operating procedure to count on having to rewind both the antenna and oscillator coils in a Philco 60.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#13

Add model 80,81,84,& 37-84 to the list too.
Terry

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
#14

You can usaully tell if the coil has been smoked by a lightning strike, the whole primary winding will look black. I recently ran into this in a lake 40s Viking battery radio (Dominion Electrohome) although it is broadcast band only so it doesn't have any extra taps. I'm not sure why they would connect a resistor between a dead coil and ground, the usual quick repair is to connect a capacitor from the antenna terminal to the secondary in some way. I've also seen this happen with an oscillator coil, a paper cap shorted out between the top of the winding and the B+, since most coil windings are made of very fine wire the internal resistance causes them to burn up. It was a rather stupid design in my opinion, much like the tone controls with B+ on the wiper capacitor.
Regards
Arran
#15

Here's the antenna coil from my donor chassis. I really hope it works out as rewinding looks like a nightmare Icon_eek

I'll have the old one out soon and try to determine why it might have failed.

[Image: http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6181/6126...da86_z.jpg]




Users browsing this thread: 7 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
New Philco Repair Bench
I am sure this is the archive, and not the Chuck's site.morzh — 09:50 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
It's not like we are good friends with that wire and can tell it from other ptetty identical looking wires. Why'n't you...morzh — 09:49 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
I'm not sure why that wire wasn't covered in the video. I'm pretty sure the 6A8 won't work until that pin is grounded. Y...RodB — 09:47 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
You'll have to forgive me, I am not sure what you mean.  Can you explain what you are really saying.  If anyone does not...georgetownjohn — 08:05 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Those are details better left to the ones who know. Maybe you disconnected the wrong end of the wire.RodB — 06:22 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Maybe this is starting to make some sense in my hard head.  Is this why the wire in question was not in the great Ron Ra...georgetownjohn — 04:34 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
I was correct with the 6A8 pin connection's, 7 and 8 are connected to ground as well as the tube shield (the broken line...RodB — 02:41 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
What does the dotted line representing that surrounds the tube in the schematic?georgetownjohn — 02:17 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Hello John, I have been there either label got lost or was not labeled ! Sincerely Richardradiorich — 02:15 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Sorry, it is a Philco 37-640.  Does that help?--Johngeorgetownjohn — 02:14 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 6700 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 6699 Guest(s)
Avatar

>