Posts: 236
Threads: 30
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Minneapolis/St. Paul MN
To a certain extent, it depends on the model radio you're working on - what I mean is that an AA5 radio will be different than a 10 tube console.
The method I can give you at the moment will not be perfect by any means, but it will get you in the ballpark. It's a "down 'n dirty" way of alignment without a signal generator.
Tune the radio to a local station preferably around 1400-1500. Then tweak each of the IF transformer slugs until the station gets louder - you'll notice a definite peak for each slug you tune. Start with the one closest to the tuning condenser. Then move on to the next one and do the same thing. When the IF's are done, you'll also notice some small adjustment screws on the tuning condenser. Do the same thing with these adjustments.
Short of having a signal generator, this should get you close, although if you look up the schematic for your particular radio, typically there are alignment instructions available for you to follow. Again, this method is far from perfect, but the radio should perform better than wehen you started. This method works on most any make of radio.
A footnote - if you don't get favorable results at one particular point, turn the slug or screw back to approximately where you started and move on to the next point.
Again, this should get you in the ballpark. Good luck!
Bill
Sent from my Pentium II on the AT&T Dial Network
8) That's neat. The radio is a PT-28, a neat little 5-tube radio. I did adjust the IF transformer slugs ( I assume that's the two little screws inside the metal housing looking down from the top). I noticed that the station at the low frequency (which is weak even under good conditions) did get louder. Then I adjusted one of the screws on the tuning condenser (again, assuming you are talking about the two screws side by side atop the tuning blades). The station got a little louder. But I am missing one of the tuning screws. I tried using one from another Philco radio I am working on, but it did not seem to fit. It was too tight and I stopped trying before I damaged something. When I tuned the radio to a better station, it came in pretty loud, but the voices sound garbled and there seemed to be a lot of vibration in the speaker.
Any more suggestions about the alignment (missing screw) and possible symptoms of garbled reception? The caps have all been replaced and I think the tubes are OK. I did not change any resistors.
Thanks again.
Karl
Posts: 236
Threads: 30
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Minneapolis/St. Paul MN
I'm not familiar too much with that particular model, but don't go looking too hard for a replacement screw. It's very possible that your model didn't use one in that position.
You said you tuned to a low frequency - what was it? Ideally, this works better when tuned to something at the higher end of the dial. Try the process again tuning in something at the upper end and see if it works better. Good luck!
Bill
Sent from my Pentium II on the AT&T Dial Network
OK, thanks again for that hint on how to align a radio without an RF signal generator. That should prove quite useful in future radio work. I did notice I was able to improve the sound to a certain optimal attainable volume and sound quality, but it is still far from perfect. I don't know if it partly due to the fact that one of the tuning screws is missing on the tuning condenser or some other reason like faulty resistors. I am going to work on relacing some of the resistors and see if that helps any. Thanks again for your help. Karl
Posts: 1,703
Threads: 55
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Evanston, IL
Check ALL resistors, but only replace any that are outside +/-20% of nominal value.
Posts: 1,703
Threads: 55
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Evanston, IL
Sounds like the loop antenna on the back has an open (broken) connection, and your hands are providing better signal coupling to the set.
Check the loop, coil #3 in the schematic and also the external antenna transformer #2 for continuity.