Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco 91 Mystery
#1

This is my first time posting and am grateful to be part of this forum ! I recently started working on a Philco 91 that I had acquired several years ago and am trying to figure out what is a mystery to me? I am told that Ron is the Philco expert, so I am very curious to see what he says ! A little background...When I opened this radio I discovered that two sections of the original BC resistor (900/2700 ohm) had apparently become very hot and at sometime had been replaced with two ohmite type ceramic resistors...one of them had deteriorated as well. The only other work that I could see done was two older dry electolytic caps had been wired in to replace the two originals. Anyway, I got the schematic and all the info I could from several sites and began to restore the radio to original specs. I replaced all the caps, rewound one coil etc etc. When i slowly powered the radio up I could not receive stations well....I took tube voltage readings and noticed the SG voltage on the RF/44-Det/36-IF/44 were way out of spec...155 volts instead of 50/80/85...I also noticed that the new BC resistor I had assembled out of 25 watt ohmites was getting pretty hot in the 2.7K ohm section....after several posts on another site, another guy with a Philco 91 opened up his set and found the same voltages ? The tubes are only rated for 90 volts max on the SG, so how could this be ? I tried replacing the 900 ohm section with a 5K ohm resistor and the SG voltages dropped to around 77 volts and the radio plays beautifully now all across the dial. All the info I have says the BC resistor was as I found it (900/2700/95/205). I am happy with the repair. I am just wondering how Philco built this radio the way it did ? I don't see how the Screen Grids on those tubes could be what they call for with that 900 ohm resistor ? Were there lot's of problems with Philco 91's ? Anyway, I am curious to see what others have to say.

Thanks for any input !

Mark H
#2

Just so nobody tries to reinvent the wheel, his thread from arf is here:

http://antiqueradios.com/forums/viewtopi...6&t=185407

John
Las Vegas, NV USA
#3

Mark came here for the answer, let's try to give him an answer here if we can.

OK Mark, I've finally found a little time to sit down and examine this situation. I have three 91 sets, but none of them are working at this point.

Which version of the 91 do you have? AM only or AM and "police" band?

I have looked in a 1933 Philco parts catalog in addition to studying the schematic, and I found a discrepancy. Philco service Bulletin 129 for the early 91 gives the resistances for the "B-C" resistor as 900, 2700, 95 and 205 ohms...but the 1933 parts catalog specifies 1200, 2400, 95 and 205 ohms. The overall resistance is the same, just distributed differently.

Complicating matters is the fact that Bulletin 129-B, covering the late Model 91 and the early Model 14, does not bother to give the resistances of the "B-C" resistor sections.

I've been doing some voltage/resistance/power calculations, and they do not make sense. I need to pull one of my 91 chassis and confirm the resistance readings myself. I see Norm Leal has already done that, but as I have two of the late chassis, I should pull one and see if the late version is the same or not.

The circuitry is basically the same as the late version 90 with two 47 outputs. I used to have one of those - but no more, it was sold several years ago. It worked very well with the same "B-C" resistor.

Comparing the late 91 and early 14 with the later 14, I see Philco changed the resistors used to drop B+ voltage to the screen grids of the RF and IF amplifier tubes - from 900 to 32,000, and from 2700 to 70,000 ohms. The B+ fed to the 32K resistor is taken directly from the output filter capacitor, not dropped by a large value field coil as in the 91 and early 14.

Don't know if I'll have time to check one of my 91 chassis this weekend - my weekend is pretty well booked up with things to do - but I'll see what I can do.

But also keep in mind that with today's higher line voltages, and modern voltmeters being far more accurate than the old 1000 ohms/volt meters that were considered "state of the art" in 1932, voltage readings are going to be higher than published values. The only way to really get voltage readings that agree with the Service Bulletins is to drop your line voltage to 115 (by use of a Variac), and to use a 1000 ohms/volt analog voltmeter for voltage measurements. These could be purchased new as recently as the 1970s; a manufacturer named Calrad (which specialized in cheap instruments back then) comes to mind for these.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#4

Thanks for you reply Ron, I was very anxious to hear what you had to say. The Philco 91 that I have is just the AM band model. Norm and Curtis were very helpful to me on ARF. I was very reluctant to make that kind of change to my radio without back up from expets. I am not an expert by any means. I was not able to find anything about Philco changing the BC resistor, so again, thanks for all the info...it really helps explain things for me. The radio is working wonderfully now.

Thanks,
Mark H




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
New Philco Repair Bench
I am sure this is the archive, and not the Chuck's site.morzh — 09:50 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
It's not like we are good friends with that wire and can tell it from other ptetty identical looking wires. Why'n't you...morzh — 09:49 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
I'm not sure why that wire wasn't covered in the video. I'm pretty sure the 6A8 won't work until that pin is grounded. Y...RodB — 09:47 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
You'll have to forgive me, I am not sure what you mean.  Can you explain what you are really saying.  If anyone does not...georgetownjohn — 08:05 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Those are details better left to the ones who know. Maybe you disconnected the wrong end of the wire.RodB — 06:22 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Maybe this is starting to make some sense in my hard head.  Is this why the wire in question was not in the great Ron Ra...georgetownjohn — 04:34 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
I was correct with the 6A8 pin connection's, 7 and 8 are connected to ground as well as the tube shield (the broken line...RodB — 02:41 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
What does the dotted line representing that surrounds the tube in the schematic?georgetownjohn — 02:17 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Hello John, I have been there either label got lost or was not labeled ! Sincerely Richardradiorich — 02:15 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Sorry, it is a Philco 37-640.  Does that help?--Johngeorgetownjohn — 02:14 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>