Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

When did the terminology change from condenser to capacitor
#1

When I was learning electronics from my Dad in the 50's he always referred to condensers, as I moved into a career in the late 60's and 70 they had become capacitors. When and why the terminology
change?
#2

Well, they were the Leyden jars first.
The "condenser" was first used by Volta in 18th century.
In my country we called them (and it is still the case) "kondensator".
I suspect the capacitor became common some time in 60-s-70-s.
#3

I've seen both terms used interchangeably on original parts lists issued by the manufacturers. In the service literature for my CGE J86 from 1932 the parts list calls them capacitors, but the service literature for other manufacturers calls them condensers. It seems that it was a matter of personal preference and that there wasn't really any convention.
Regards
Arran
#4

Actually same is true today for inductances.

We call them "inductance" or "inductor" if not wanting to be very specific, or "choke" if it is a filtering element, or "coil" if it is a part of a resonant tank / tuned circuit.
Although the borders are blurred and one could hear any inductance called any name from the above.
#5

In the 60's the old timers called them condensers.
#6

I interviewed once an engineer, fairly recently, some less than 4 years ago, he, when speaking of his career, used the word "kilocycles". I think he was about 70 years old at the time.
#7

Don't think kilocycles is obsolete yet, is it?
#8

Cycles were replaced with Hertz sometime in the 60's. Personally, I still like to call them cycles, a much better descriptive term.
#9

It is obsolete in the engineering world though.
In schools they teach to call the units in the SI.
For that reason the conductivity is no longer Mho, but Siemens.
Then I think US was the only country that called Hertz "a cycle".

Hey, we still are using imperial system...even the UK ditched it in engineering.
#10

That figures, standard international units means renaming something after a German, interesting how they didn't name anything after James Clark Maxwell but tried to rename something after Siemens. I'm sure Siemens and Halske had something to do with that form of product placement. I believe that the used cycles per second in most English speaking countries, possibly Japan as well since they used to emulate the U.S, as old appliances in Australia have the line frequency quoted in cycles not Hertz.
Regards
Arran
#11

This is simply not true.

BTW one Maxwell is the unit of mag. flux in CGS system.

Newton - after Sir Isaac Newton, an Englishman, a unit of force.
Coulomb - after a Frenchman Charles Augiustin de Coulomb, a unit of charge.
Ampere - after Anfre Marie Amper, a frenchman., a unit of current.
Volt - after Alessandro Volta, an italian, a unit of voltage.
Kelvin - a scottsman, 1st Baron Lord Kelvin, England - a unit of temperature.

BTW there are only two named units amongst the base units and those are Ampere and Kelvin.

And it is no one's fault that most of the prominent physicists were from Germany.
And Maxwell was BTW one of the most active proponents of the SI.

And, speaking of civilization....three countries in the whole world have not adopted the SI.
Those are:

Burma
Liberia
USA


We are in a mighty good company....
#12

Just for the record...when I work on older muscle cars and do tune-ups I still buy points and CONDENSORS, not capacitors. Some times refuse to die! Take care. Gary

"Don't pity the dead, pity the living, above all, those living without love."
Professor Albus Dumbledore
Gary - Westland Michigan
#13

Agreed KHC and MHZ are correct, and I am now an old timer.
#14

I meant retroactively renaming a unit of measurement after a German, decades after it was established under a different name, Volts, Ohms, Amps, Farads have been used since the beginning. The one that gets me is Hertz, they had cycles per second used for almost a century, maybe longer, and they already had Hertzonian waves named after the man. As for the U.S not adopting Si units, whatever, it didn't stop them from putting several men on the moon, invent the triode vacuum tube, the transistor, the integrated circuit, the internet, satellite television, etc.
Regards
Arran
#15

At the risk of exposing my ignorance, what are SI units?




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Hi Morzh, May be a good idea to remove the cone to prevent damage. You may have to do so anyway to remove the pole ...MrFixr55 — 08:44 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
I think that Danaher, the company that owns Beckman-Coulter (the company that I worked for 41 years) owns Fluke. They a...MrFixr55 — 08:35 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
Rod I wish... :lol: I am not sure I'd buy the Fluke, had it not fell in my lap for free. $500 to $800...it's a lot...morzh — 08:09 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
Mike, ...you get a commission?RodB — 07:52 PM
New member
Hi. I specialize in refurbishing Predictas, but I'm in Chicago. If you can get it to me, I'd be happy to go over it. ...Bob Andersen — 06:43 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
I have 3 G speaker, all with open Field coils. Today I pull one of the shelf and decided to try to remove the FC (spo...morzh — 06:07 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
Thanks Mike. I will check them out.dconant — 05:52 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
There is no such thing as bad Fluke. This said, they are expensive. A Fluke is easily 10x the price of comparable CCC...morzh — 05:45 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
Hello Mike, Yes, I have 3 Fluke meters one being my first Fluke 77 and other being Fluke 87. My third is Fluke clamp -...radiorich — 05:04 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
I knew that Fluke was the Cadillac so with that in mind what Fluke would you recommend I get?dconant — 03:53 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>