Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Beautiful and highly desirable INGRAHAM CABINET!
#1

really what drugs are they on restored ??
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Antique-1939-Eme...233069f423
#2

Half a Mae West with a crack in her ***. Chassis plays Ok but not a great playing set, Emersom had some sleepers but I think with the power cord on this one it could be electrifying.

Paul

Tubetalk1
#3

Yeah...that ballast tube looks like it just came from garbage.
But yeah...for whatever reason these Emersons are collectable.
Don't see why.

Here's from tuberadioland:
http://www.tuberadioland.com/EmersonAX-212_main.html
#4

That's no ballast tube, that's the antenna coil.
#5

Again, as Morzh/Mike knows Emersons are cheap radios in sometimes pretty cabinets. The cabinet on this set looks terrible, someone at some point slobbed lacquer or varnish all over the original flaking finish, then there is that damaged speaker grille. I really don't get the appeal of these, Emerson wasn't the only one to use fancy cabinets on small sets, yet they seem to grab all the glory just because of that tin plate on the back.
Regards
Arran
#6

Sometimes the plate is on the bottom.

"I just might turn into smoke, but I feel fine"
http://www.russoldradios.com/
#7

I don't know how he can describe that as "restored".. it looks like he dunked it in a can of clear poly and called it done. I wonder how bad the insides are?

The artist formerly known as Puhpow! 8)
#8

From the looks of the antenna coil, I don't see how that radio can work. It looks like it has been struck by lightening.
Jerry

A friend in need is a pest!  Bill Slee ca 1970.
#9

I would take one of these, I bet it would play better, not an Ingraham.
http://www.radiomuseum.org/r/emerson_599_120075b.html

AM only but I bet a good player.

Paul

Tubetalk1
#10

Brenda,

You are right, at a closer look it is the antenna coil. Oh, my Gosh! This thing looks like it has been lifted from the ocean floor after 40 years. If it works, I'll be a monkey's uncle.




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Philco 16 is not intimidating at all. Despite being an 11-tuber. 37-116 is indeed intimidating. 16 has good space unde...morzh — 04:11 PM
48-482 rear panel help
Thanks for the responses Gary and Bob. I'm a little surprised that there's no back panel - although I know older Philco'...keithchip — 04:09 PM
48-482 rear panel help
Gary is correct, there was not a rear panel on the 48-482. I restored one of those and its a great sounding radio that ...klondike98 — 03:24 PM
The list of my radio & TV collection!
A little light positivity in our feed... To nostalgic retro music... With English subtitles My new video on the contin...RadioSvit — 02:14 PM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Ron and Mike I mentioned a 2 meg resistor not on the schematic. I stumbled on a changes note in Riders that mentioned th...dconant — 12:02 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Here you go: Your the code 125Radioroslyn — 11:12 AM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Hi Ron, Thanks for the input. I think I'm going to call it good enough. It does seem weird I can usually dial in othe...dconant — 08:01 AM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Welcome, the radio looks intimating 11 tubes, wish you well.Jimradio — 07:49 AM
462ron
Hi Dan, it’s been 10 years since I restored the electronics on my 37-116 so I’m going on some foggy memories. I remember...462ron — 07:37 AM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Yes the 16B as morzh pointed out. Specifically its the January 1935 model version of the 16B. There are a couple earli...klondike98 — 11:51 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>