Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

48-482 alignment
#1

Probably the first of several alignment questions.  My 48-482 is finally recapped, back together and playing.  I'm reading the AM alignment info and step 1 is to connect the signal generator to through a 0.1 mf cap to the "stator of ant. section of tuning gang."  The stator being the fixed plates, I think the connection I need to make is either lug #1 or # 2 in the following photo but am not sure which one. Help? Thanks!!
[Image: https://www.dropbox.com/s/rojese3iq43nys....jpg?raw=1]

Schematic @ http://www.nostalgiaair.org/Resources/637/M0013637.htm
#2

Antenna section is #2, oscillator is #1

( edited to correct error)
#3

Thanks Mondial!
#4

Sorry klondike, but I gave you incorrect information. I was thinking of the FM sections of the tuning cap, where the ant section is closest to the front panel. I just checked my own 48-482 and the AM sections are reversed ( at least on mine).

So the osc section is closest to the front panel and the ant section is toward the back. #1 is osc and #2 is ant. I have edited my previous post to correct the error.

Sorry for any confusion!
#5

Thanks Mondial, no worries. Had not been back to work on it yet. Help me understand how you could tell which was which, I kept looking at the schematic but just could not sort it out.
#6

I checked it by tuning in a station at the high end of the band and then touching my finger to each terminal.

When you touch the osc section it will detune the station off frequency and your finger capacity may even tune it to the nearest lower freq station.

When you touch the ant section, the station stays tuned on freq but the signal and/or noise level will vary.

It is a bit odd that Philco reversed the order of the AM and FM sections of the tuning cap. Since the AM ant and osc sections are wired directly to the band switch, they could have just as easily kept AM and FM consistent. Usually in other radios they correspond in order.

Try it yourself and see of your set is wired the same as mine.
#7

Thanks for the lesson! I'll give it a try.




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
The list of my radio & TV collection!
Thank you Arran, this is very interesting information. With your permission, I will definitely use it when I make a vide...RadioSvit — 04:14 AM
The list of my radio & TV collection!
Peter; For a start your DeForest Crosley 6D632 was a 1936-37 model, and I believe it had six tubes, and 3 wave bands,...Arran — 03:07 AM
AES type of Battery Eliminator has hum in B+
This is interesting, they actually designed the B+ side with some form of voltage regulation, I think? Most of the B+ su...Arran — 02:21 AM
AES type of Battery Eliminator has hum in B+
They are trying to use a regulator. Essentially it is an LDO schematic. LDOs are supposed to greatly reduce ripple, so t...morzh — 12:11 AM
AES type of Battery Eliminator has hum in B+
So, I just built a 90 volt 40ma battery eliminator for a farm radio and had to use 1000 mfd for the input filter cap to ...RodB — 10:31 PM
AES type of Battery Eliminator has hum in B+
Caps of 1,000 uF 250V are about $7 in Mouser. C1 could be increased. A NTC inrush limiter could be employed to limit t...morzh — 10:24 PM
AES type of Battery Eliminator has hum in B+
Bruce B — 09:41 PM
AES type of Battery Eliminator has hum in B+
Bruce Could you post the schematic if this power supply?morzh — 09:31 PM
AES type of Battery Eliminator has hum in B+
Hello All, I have built a battery eliminator using the most popular AES K101a. Using plans and all the AES parts  order...Bruce B — 09:27 PM
Need to purchase Old Philco Radio Knobs
Hello Paulo , I have Philco 38-10 too that I am restoring the chassis is almost complete ! Far as my cabinet It is in ...radiorich — 09:00 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>