Posts: 2
Threads: 1
Joined: Jun 2014
City: Lubbock, TX
Rebuilding a Philco model 80, I used all the advice from Ron Ramirez. I had already rebuilt one of these, so it was easy to remove the second IF transformer to replace the factory 4 megohm with a 2 megohm. Imagine my surprise when I found no 50 mmf in parallel with the resistor which had changed to 6.6 megs. It was easy to put a 50 mmf from my stock but I was amazed that such a radio with a missing part came out of the Philco factory. It must not have been very sensitive. I could tell that no one had removed that coil previously. Interesting mystery.
Posts: 13,776
Threads: 580
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Ferdinand
State, Province, Country: Indiana
Later production 80 sets added a turn or two of wire around the IF transformer in place of the 50 pF cap; this loop is open-ended (only one end of the wire is connected).
See: http://www.philcoradio.com/tech/images/80acan.jpg
The 81 and 84 used the same type of IF transformer, also without the 50 pF cap.
--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
Posts: 15,832
Threads: 554
Joined: Oct 2011
City: Jackson, NJ
Interesting.
Without this cap the Grid Leak detector should simply not work.
The radio could use some parasitics and still detect, but not via grid leak.
Unless they had some non-obvious cap there.
(This post was last modified: 06-18-2014, 04:28 PM by morzh.)
Posts: 15,832
Threads: 554
Joined: Oct 2011
City: Jackson, NJ
Is that phantom winding shown in the sch the cap replacement?
Posts: 13,776
Threads: 580
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Ferdinand
State, Province, Country: Indiana
Yes.
--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
Posts: 2
Threads: 1
Joined: Jun 2014
City: Lubbock, TX
Thanks to all for the response. I knew that the model 84 used the few turns of wire instead of a capacitor. The 84 schematic shows that. There was no such wire in my model 80 IF transformer. Morzh is right the radio did not work well at all without the capacitor. It is much more sensitive now with the grid leak capacitor. I am still amazed that the radio made it past Philco inspection.
Posts: 28
Threads: 0
Joined: Nov 2013
City: Tucson, AZ
More surprising is that it has SURVIVED! You would think that by this time it would have been trashed! Glad it wasn't, and that it fell into the hands of someone who could recognize the 'Factory Error'.
Posts: 15,832
Threads: 554
Joined: Oct 2011
City: Jackson, NJ
Indeed. Especially the 80, the "teaser" "under-radio"
Posts: 109
Threads: 18
Joined: Mar 2015
City: Ann Arbor, Michigan
I am starting some work on a Philco 80. In a 2014 post, this gentleman mentions:
"Rebuilding a Philco model 80, I used all the advice from Ron Ramirez. I had already rebuilt one of these, so it was easy to remove the second IF transformer to replace the factory 4 megohm with a 2 megohm. Imagine my surprise when I found no 50 mmf in parallel with the resistor which had changed to 6.6 megs. It was easy to put a 50 mmf from my stock but I was amazed that such a radio with a missing part came out of the Philco factory. It must not have been very sensitive. I could tell that no one had removed that coil previously. Interesting mystery."
Is there a tech tip or information on this 4 meg to 2 meg replacement? Or the 50mm capacitor replacement? Should I expect to need to make a mod like that?
Thanks,
Mark K8KZ
Posts: 13,776
Threads: 580
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Ferdinand
State, Province, Country: Indiana
I wrote this up several years ago and gave it to Chuck to put on his page:
http://www.philcorepairbench.com/tips/svctip44.htm
Only early production 80 sets have the 50 pF cap. Later, Philco changed the IF transformer so that it has a capacity winding instead of the 50 pF cap. If you follow the link in this post and look at the partial schematic there, notice the little curl just above and to the left of the 4 meg resistor (16) - that is the capacity winding which replaced the 50 pF cap.
Yes, your 80 will definitely work better by replacing the 4 meg resistor with a 2 meg resistor.
More 80 mods:
http://www.philcorepairbench.com/tips/svctip43.htm
--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
Posts: 109
Threads: 18
Joined: Mar 2015
City: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Hey Ron,
Question about the "gimmick" capacitor.
I finished work on a Model 19 cathedral a little while back. I had rewound the tickler coil a number of times trying to get even minimal performance out of that 36 oscillator. My last and most recent rewind seemed to work the best, though that is to say, barely at all. I had done the coil baking and from what I could tell, I followed all the advice available.
However, when I soldered a 2 foot piece of hookup with to the cathode of the 36 tube and just let it poke out the back, the radio comes to life and works beautifully across the entire BC band. I tried various mica capacitors to replace the capacitance I supposedly introduced by the wire (gimmick capacitor?), but no luck.
My next step would have been to do the 6A7 mod, and I still may do that. However, I was suffering from "Model 19-fatigue", so I left the radio as-is for now.
Why have you never recommended the 36 cathode-gimmick capacitor for the Model 19 like you did for the 80 and 84 models?
BTW...I really appreciate all your great advice as well as that of so many other members on Philco Phorum.
Mark K8KZ
Posts: 13,776
Threads: 580
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Ferdinand
State, Province, Country: Indiana
Different radio, different design. Apples and oranges.
Model 80 is a regenerative radio; Models 19 and 89 are not.
Model 80 needs all the help it can get just to pick up signals as it was designed as a "price leader" just to get people into the stores where it was the salesman's job to try to sell the customer a more expensive Philco. The ploy backfired with the 80, and nearly 200,000 were sold.
Models 19 and 89, when properly operating, do not need any help to pick up signals as they are much better radios (not regenerative).
Model 80 has no RF amplifier stage; Models 19 and 89 do.
Your 19 should not require any "gimmick" capacitor. That it needs this wire to operate indicates that you 19 still has problems.
Please continue discussion of your 19 in your thread on your model 19 to avoid confusion. Thanks.
--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
Users browsing this thread: 7 Guest(s)
|
Recent Posts
|
Made mistake & did not label connection
|
Those are details better left to the ones who know. Maybe you disconnected the wrong end of the wire.RodB — 06:22 PM |
Made mistake & did not label connection
|
Maybe this is starting to make some sense in my hard head. Is this why the wire in question was not in the great Ron Ra...georgetownjohn — 04:34 PM |
Made mistake & did not label connection
|
I was correct with the 6A8 pin connection's, 7 and 8 are connected to ground as well as the tube shield (the broken line...RodB — 02:41 PM |
Made mistake & did not label connection
|
What does the dotted line representing that surrounds the tube in the schematic?georgetownjohn — 02:17 PM |
Made mistake & did not label connection
|
Hello John,
I have been there either label got lost or was not labeled !
Sincerely Richardradiorich — 02:15 PM |
Made mistake & did not label connection
|
Sorry, it is a Philco 37-640. Does that help?--Johngeorgetownjohn — 02:14 PM |
two videos to watch VHS and history of TV
|
Hello Every,
Here are a couple videos right up my alley VHS and the history of Television .
history of VCR VHS
Hi...radiorich — 02:13 PM |
Made mistake & did not label connection
|
You haven't given us the model number of the set so I looked up the 6A8 pin assignment. Pin 8 is the cathode and pin 7 i...RodB — 01:19 PM |
Made mistake & did not label connection
|
Happy Thanksgiving all!
I have made a real bonehead mistake this time. Hope someone can help. I am trying to determi...georgetownjohn — 12:51 PM |
New Philco Repair Bench
|
Apparently there is a new Philco Repair Bench found at https://philcoradio.com/repairbench/ When I try to go to order a ...dconant — 12:00 PM |
Who's Online
|
There are currently 4991 online users. [Complete List] » 2 Member(s) | 4989 Guest(s)
|
|
|
|