Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Issue with rebuilt 38-690 audio transformer
#31

It appears that way, I guess. Thank you for being patient. Now, another stupid question on my part:

I'm confused about part 172, marked "tweeter field" on my schematic. Obviously this part is open, and I'm assuming it's the main speaker field coil. However, why is it marked "tweeter field" on the schematic? Obviously I wouldn't be thrilled about having the coil on that massive speaker rewound, but would do it if I needed to. The main speaker's field coil reads about 4.2K ohms. Don't know how far off that is, as there are no resistances given on the schematic for it.
Again, thank you for your patience.
#32

If it says tweeter coil, it is tweeter coil. 4.2K is not open and it says right there in the sch 4300 ohms. (yes it is given in the sch, just take a good look).
So, disconnect your tweeter, measure its field one more time, it will likely show full open.
Again, open means just that, open, no finite resistance present.
Check the wires just in case they are broken, but likely you will have to have your tweeter field redone.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#33

Thanks, Walrus. I can stomach that a heck of a lot more easily than having the big speaker field coil done. I will check in the morning. For now, going to bed and will likely dream of speakers, multimeters and OLs. Thanks for the help, I'll let you know and will try to make it as clear as possible Icon_wtf
#34

Suerte!


PS. For testing purpose, you could use a big 470 ohm resistor with proper power dissip rating (possibly 10W) to put instead of tweeter coil, this way you can have sound and do other stuff while your tweeter is being redone.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#35

Well, I fixed the problem.
YOu were on track with the tweeter field being open. Only it wasn't open; both tweeters tested fine. So I started tracing the wire from the speaker wiring harness all the way through the chassis, into each tie in point. Everything checked out OK on the first field coil. When I got to the second, one of the two field coil wires showed no continuity. The only thing thta that could be was a chafed or corroded wire. So I cut it out, removed the clamp holding the wiring bundle to the chassis and Bingo. Under the clamp, the wire was abraded in that spot and though it wasn't separated, it read open. Solder a new one to the pin, rewired, restored continuity to the tweeter field and cautiously started up the radio.
HOLY COW this radio cranks! Sounds fabulous!
Morzh, I can't thank you enough for helping me through this. It would have been a hard thing to spot if not for your guidance. I'm in your debt, and will post updates as I continue to go through the set.
Imagine that ... an abraded wire!

Ted


Attached Files Image(s)
   
#36

(07-01-2015, 12:57 AM)Diverted Wrote:  Imagine that ... an abraded wire!

Ted

Ted


My post #32

>>> ...disconnect your tweeter, measure its field one more time, it will likely show full open...... Check the wires just in case they are broken.....     


Icon_smile



Yes you always have to allow for the less likely (albeit favourable) scenario Icon_smile




Glad it worked, I am sure it is fun to listen to. Hope to find me one one day.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#37

I hope you do too. It's a beast. Very intimidating, but it's an impressive thing.




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Road Trip for a Philco 46-480
Good morning, folks! I’ve finished the cabinet and the electrical restoration, and have detailed those in their respecti...jrblasde — 10:56 AM
Studebaker/Philco AC-2687 car radio
Arran, Thanks for checking you manuals. I appreciate that. Let me know what you find. PhilPdouglaski — 08:46 AM
Studebaker/Philco AC-2687 car radio
I have some car radio service manuals, Riders I think (not to be confused with the big blue binders), so I may see if on...Arran — 01:20 AM
Philco model 40-100
Greetings; Here is an update, I found a listing on fleabay for a similar chassis to yours, and it has a photo of what...Arran — 12:58 AM
Philco model 40-100
Greetings; I think I may have found a clue as to what is missing, from a search I made, there is a rear view of the c...Arran — 12:12 AM
Philco model 40-100
I recently acquired a Philco model 40-100 farm (battery) radio. The radio was in very good condition except the red on f...mhamby — 05:59 PM
Studebaker/Philco AC-2687 car radio
Hello, Richard the radio is an AC-2687 Studebaker model. The Philco model is S -5323 and the chassis p/n is S-5523Pdouglaski — 11:52 AM
48-482 rear panel help
The 48-482 is an AC only set as well, featuring a power transformer. While the transformer shouldn’t get “hot”, it is ye...jrblasde — 11:12 AM
Studebaker/Philco AC-2687 car radio
I gave a Chrysler/MoPar car radio from 1954, it was made by Philco, and it uses two chassis, one has the power supply an...Arran — 11:06 AM
48-482 rear panel help
Hello keithchip. You could make a hardboard back for the set, but make sure you provide plenty of ventilation holes in ...GarySP — 11:04 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 750 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 749 Guest(s)
Avatar

>