Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

How much Oscilloscope is enough?
#1

I was looking at some PC based 'scopes. I have this huge Sencore SC61 unit that weighs at least 25 - 30 pounds, 60 MHZ usable to 100 MHZ. I'd like to sell it because I don't think I need to go that high doing tube radio repair/ restoration, and frankly, I don't have the room to use it. Would 20 MHZ be adequate? Hantek makes a PC based 20 MHZ unit for $69 and a 50 MHZ unit for $149. Any thoughts? Thanks! Joe

Joe

Matthew 16:26 "For what does it profit a man if he gain the whole world, yet lose his own soul?"
#2

For AM raio it is enough, for FM you need more.
I rarely use scope on radios....maybe for output. Or to check oscillatiors.
#3

Do you do any electronic repair other than old AM tube gear?

What have you used your scope for in the last XX years?  A good chance the upper frequency response will not change.

All the PC base stuff is getting better and cheaper.

There also older compact scopes that show up now & then.

Scopes are one of those things you don't need till you need.

Rule 1 if you are selling you get almost nothing.
Rule 2 if you need one they are all $$

PC base makes capturing nifty pictures easy from what I  can tell.  I still have to try using a digital camera capture a trace.

Good probes can be as expensive as used scopes.  Again it depends on band width.  Probably want to keep your probes.
#4

(09-14-2014, 04:21 PM)Joe Rossi Wrote:  I was looking at some PC based 'scopes.  I have this huge Sencore SC61 unit that weighs at least 25 - 30 pounds, 60 MHZ usable to 100 MHZ.  I'd like to sell it because I don't think I need to go that high doing tube radio repair/ restoration, and frankly, I don't have the room to use it.  Would 20 MHZ be adequate?  Hantek makes a PC based 20 MHZ unit for $69 and a 50 MHZ unit for $149.  Any thoughts?  Thanks!  Joe

I briefly used the 20 MHz version with signals in the 1-2 MHz range. The display looked kind of rough and coarse. So if it was me, I'd spend the extra on the 50 MHz unit. Other than that it worked well, and I think they are adequate for occasional use.  




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Looking for verification of correct schematic.
Definitely 870044RossH — 01:12 PM
12' Philco
Wonder if the chassis was big too.daveone23 — 12:38 PM
Philco 38-2 Automatic Tuning
Hi Ron, I have sent Radio Daze my concerns with the dial so I guess we will see. They used my original to make the repro...dconant — 12:27 PM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
How does the  5W4 and 83 tube filaments get fed?martinj — 12:25 PM
462ron
Hi Dan, your original dial appears to be lighter, easier to allow light through. My original is similar except it’s crac...462ron — 12:07 PM
Philco 38-2 Automatic Tuning
I received my new 38-2 dial. I'm a little disappointed. As you can see in the picture the blues have a white shadow. The...dconant — 11:13 AM
Philco 38-2 Low Volume
I have been playing my 38-2 for a while now and it is doing very well. I did have to replace the 6A8 (osc) as it develop...dconant — 11:03 AM
Philco Speaker Spider
Hello, Does anyone with a 3 D printer make the spiders for those old Philco speakers? That might be a good idea for some...dconant — 09:41 AM
Philco 16B Parts
Hello, I'm looking to buy a 16B but I'm not so sure of what I am looking at. First as seen from the picture it looks lik...dconant — 09:17 AM
Looking for verification of correct schematic.
Klondike98, Thank you. I'll double check that SN and get back to you. GarySP, Thank you for the schematic.RossH — 12:13 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>