Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Any brave souls???
#1

.. that would be willing to tackle a wonky Tek 500MHz 4 channel digital scope? I'm more than willing to pay for repairs (but not necessarily Tek rates!).

I'll provide the model  number a bit later.

TIA
#2

Brenda,


I would but right now I am in a process of buying a house and will be consequently moving etc, so right now the timing kinda sucks for me to do anything of the sort.

However the thing being repairable would also depend on what kind of a digi-scope it is, computer-based (motherboard, Windows and all), microprocessor / microchips usage, type of a PCB inside, chips' technology (BGA etc).......depending on it all the repair might be outside of possibility if not equipped to do such things. Gosh knows it might require LSI chip rework station.
Plus uProcessors have code in them, and if it croaked, well, good luck with it.

This is why old analog with proper bandwidth is more repairable.
#3

And not to mention, the notorious silver-plated ceramic terminal strips.

[Image: http://www.partsconnexion.com/media/prod...-70669.JPG]

:-)

Chuck
#4

OK... the model of the scope is TDS540B. I REALLY want this thing to be up to par, so I'm willing to pay and willing to wait.

Also, I have an HP8656B signal generator (100KHz to 999MHz) that has had something go out in the output section. Some frequencies still have a decent output, but a lot of them are WAY down. It does still work at all frequencies, but the output curve looks something like a rollercoaster. If anyone wants to try their hand at repairing that, it's worth some good money to me as well.
#5

Oy vey....


Brenda,

What's wrong with the idea of yourself taking a stab at it first?
#6

This stuff honestly scares me. I've got virtually no experience with digital, and the last time I opened a scope I was just overwhelmed. I know my limits. Icon_smile
#7

Brenda,

Digital is simpler than analog.
Way, way simpler.

On the engineering world digital folks envy us, people who know analog.
Digital folks are dime a dozen.
Many of them have the faintest idea about how currents behave.
Digital, if not High Speed, is extremely simple.


The poblem is not digital, but the fact that these might contain a micropocesor with code, or an FPGA, and if this goes, other than manufacturer no one really can help you. Code is, well, code.
#8

As far as repairing the HP 8656B, the difficulty will be getting parts since it is no longer supported by Agilent or its new successor. These generators use custom hybrid microcircuits in the output stage, so without the replacement parts repair is next to impossible. I believe this generator uses a PIN diode switched attenuator at the output, which may be where the problem is.

Probably the best solution would be to find a inexpensive parts 8656B on ebay, and use it to interchange modules to localize the problem.




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Looking for verification of correct schematic.
Definitely 870044RossH — 01:12 PM
12' Philco
Wonder if the chassis was big too.daveone23 — 12:38 PM
Philco 38-2 Automatic Tuning
Hi Ron, I have sent Radio Daze my concerns with the dial so I guess we will see. They used my original to make the repro...dconant — 12:27 PM
462ron
Hi Dan, your original dial appears to be lighter, easier to allow light through. My original is similar except it’s crac...462ron — 12:07 PM
Philco 38-2 Automatic Tuning
I received my new 38-2 dial. I'm a little disappointed. As you can see in the picture the blues have a white shadow. The...dconant — 11:13 AM
Philco 38-2 Low Volume
I have been playing my 38-2 for a while now and it is doing very well. I did have to replace the 6A8 (osc) as it develop...dconant — 11:03 AM
Philco Speaker Spider
Hello, Does anyone with a 3 D printer make the spiders for those old Philco speakers? That might be a good idea for some...dconant — 09:41 AM
Philco 16B Parts
Hello, I'm looking to buy a 16B but I'm not so sure of what I am looking at. First as seen from the picture it looks lik...dconant — 09:17 AM
Looking for verification of correct schematic.
Klondike98, Thank you. I'll double check that SN and get back to you. GarySP, Thank you for the schematic.RossH — 12:13 AM
Looking for verification of correct schematic.
I think you have the correct take on your set. Ron's annotated early schematics that note the below B22000 serial numbe...klondike98 — 12:04 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 1555 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 1554 Guest(s)
Avatar

>