Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

42-321 Questions
#1

What is the procedure for checking continuity on the audio section of this radio?? I think my field coil is ok, hard to say about the rest. I do not have an audio generator yet. Thanks. That's a philco 42-321 that is.
#2

Measure the resistance from the cathode of the 35Z3 to the plate of the 50L6. Should see 2k or less.

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
#3

The field coil is measured between the two Plusses of #31 cap, can't see the value, looks like 530 Ohm, but should be under 1kOhm.

Terry gave you the measurement for the output xfmr primary.
The secondary is always fine.

Now the speaker itself is another matter: you cannot measure it unless unsolder one of the two speaker leads,
then measure between them to see the resistance of maybe 4 or 8 Ohms. Otherwise it is masked by the secondary low resistance.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#4

Well if you measure from cathode to plate as I described it's telling you the series resistance of both fc and primary of the opt together, or did I miss something?

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
#5

You're absolutely right Terry, I just missed the fact you were referring to both tubes. Yes, one stone with two birds. (I wonder what two birds can do to one stone......)

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#6

There is a rectangular piece of paper behind the dial that is now Roached. Do I just use hard stock paper for this or is there another product I should use. Thanks.
#7

Hardstock paper should do fine.  ( I merged your question with your other 42-321 thread and modified the title to keep the topic together ...  see the Phorum Rules.)  Icon_thumbup
#8

Do you recommend removing #8 capacitor and choke assembly, I understand this is a trap for old ship to shore frequencies and possibly trap for stray reactances from old capacitors which will be changed to new ones. Just wondering if I could get rid of it or just keep the coil and replace the cap.
Thanks for all the replies fellas.
#9

Unless it is all broken up and threatens the whole radio integrity, there is no harm in leaving it alone. If a cap is a paper one and is leaky....could be removed. I think either way it does not affect the operation much.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#10

What I've done is pull the innards out of the cap and restuff it with a new one leave the coil in place. Electrically the cap provides a ground from B- to the chassis so I would leave the cap and connect it from B- to the chassis without the coil.

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
#11

Well, I assumed (without looking in the sch) we were talking about the trap that usually goes in the antenna circuit; in this case what I said is not correct, and I agree with Terry: you do not necessarily need the coil but you do need the cap. Without this cap you might have a whole lot of howling and motorboating.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#12

I tested the field coil several ways and got a open circuit every time.
What do you suggest, PM speaker with multi watt resistor in place of choke??
Haven't peeled the paper back yet to see if prob is on outside.
#13

http://www.nostalgiaair.org/pagesbymodel...013512.pdf

Value of the resistor isn't particularly critical as it's in the positive side of the hv. If it was in the negative side then it would change the amount of negative bias voltage available. So looks like the original is about 500ohms, I would go a bit higher around 1000-1500ohm @ 2-5W. You'll need to boost the value of the filter caps too as the resistor isn't very efficient at eliminating hum like a choke is. Would use 2-47mf @160v.

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
#14

I ohm'd out the RF transformer (part #11).
The secondary gave 30 ohms but the primary
showed infinity. Is it easy to find this part or do I have to find another 42-321.
Thanks
#15

(10-28-2016, 11:02 PM)Paperboy Wrote:  I ohm'd out the RF transformer (part #11).
The secondary gave 30 ohms but the primary
showed infinity. Is it easy to find this part or do I have to find another 42-321.
Thanks

I would wind 50 or 60 turns of sm magnet on the coil form like 36ga wire. It's untuned so it not super critical. Or you could use a rf choke in place of that winding and use a small mica cap like 50pf from the plate of the rf amp to the input grid of the mixer tube. Or this https://www.tubesandmore.com/products/an...ube-radios

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
Today I've been reading through the site trying to learn more about this radio. I also soldered the lose power cord cabl...osanders0311 — 08:24 PM
Philco 610B oscillator wiring
Thanks David! I do have that same later prodution model 610 schematic. I've also studied the Philco service bulletins fo...Tubester — 08:12 PM
Philco 610B oscillator wiring
Some info from Beitmans says late production. David   David — 06:06 PM
Restoring Philco 96
Oh wow! Just found this thread.  Brings me back to early days on this phorum.  I did a 96 back in 2017.  Thread here: ...rfeenstra — 06:05 PM
Philco 610B oscillator wiring
Thanks for the replies. It's not the really the hum that I am after. Just trying to understand why only the shortwave ba...Tubester — 04:01 PM
Restoring Philco 96
70 and 90 are Superhets, but at least the 2x45 model of 90 uses the Plate detector (and so does 70). Also the Atwaters,...morzh — 03:28 PM
Restoring Philco 96
Morzh, Prayers for your mom. I am sure that there was enough pain living through the Holocaust as a child. I pray dail...MrFixr55 — 02:19 PM
Philco 610B oscillator wiring
Hi Dan, Divide and conquer. First off trry to differentiate between 60Hz and 120 Hz hum. 120 Hz hum has a higher pit...MrFixr55 — 01:49 PM
Restoring Philco 96
Yes, other than takin a toll on your back, they are undeed way more repair friendly than many other Philcos. To me, som...morzh — 01:04 PM
Philco 610B oscillator wiring
If the wires look like they were this way from the factory (very neat and very dull soldering joints), I'd leave them be...morzh — 12:58 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>