Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tearing Apart
#1

Well, I'm now tearing apart my parts chassis- I think it is from a 38-3, but stamped inside is 38-1754. Details match a 38-3: 9 tube, 3 band, magnetic tuning. I'm just wondering about the 1754 stamp... Any ideas? Or is it just a miscellaneous stamping? I know my 37-650 had 37-650 clearly stamped on it in several places...

Mainly tearing this one up because it came as a parts set to me, but space requirements demand I take it to parts. No cabinet or speaker- I just was given the chassis, with a couple tubes on it. Luckily one was an excellent 6F6G I needed for the 37-650. Also, I believe it has the same power supply- although the numbers are different.

Lots of bits, however... Now I happily have more bakelites to rebuild for stock, some more junctions, rf coils, variable caps, tube sockets... Just have to figure out what to do with the magnetic tuning parts. Keep them or flog 'em? I'm having fun Icon_smile

Scott

Old Cars, Old Radios, Old Pipes and Young Women... What more is there?
#2

I'll bet that stamp in on the RF sub-chassis, right? Icon_smile

That's the part number of the sub-chassis assy, not anything to do with a "model number."
Philco sub-bases and sub-chassis' were designated with the 38- prefix.

See this Service Tip from my site about Philco's part numbering scheme:

PHILCO SERVICE HINTS & TIPS - NUMBER 34
Philco Part Numbering System


Many people confuse Philco part numbers that start with 36-, 37-, 38-, 39-, etc. with model numbers, due to the fact that Philco started using the model year as a prefix to it's model numbers in 1937 on up. There's a Service Tip on this in the TIPS section as well.
#3

You hit it, Chuck! When the light hit the back of the chassis main frame just right, I could make out the original 38-3, code ??? stamp, where it was missing... I could see where the ink had been, but it was no longer dark. Odd thing- my 37-650 had that number(37-650) stamped in the same type large number in several places, similar to the number I was originally referring to. (These are rubber stampings- not metal stamps)

Scott

Old Cars, Old Radios, Old Pipes and Young Women... What more is there?




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
48-482 rear panel help
I also have one of these, again it never had a back, and no trace of one. I have been told that the pushbuttons used to ...Arran — 03:29 AM
48-482 rear panel help
Thanks Joseph. Hope you get to restore your 48-482 before too long!keithchip — 02:12 AM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
RCAs ain't no cake either.morzh — 10:32 PM
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
After a couple of days worth of troubleshooting my signal generator, I gave up. The oscilloscope still worked fine, so I...jrblasde — 09:51 PM
48-482 rear panel help
Yes, I can confirm. I bought one (haven’t restored it yet) which didn’t have a back panel.jrblasde — 09:37 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Try a 39-116.Radioroslyn — 09:24 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
I remember Philco 45 being awkward. If I am not mistaking it for some other set. I think there is a phenolic board, or e...morzh — 08:49 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
If you want a radio that's difficult to work on, get a 37-620. The one side of the chassis is packed pretty tightly and ...Greg — 07:29 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Philco 16 is not intimidating at all. Despite being an 11-tuber. 37-116 is indeed intimidating. 16 has good space unde...morzh — 04:11 PM
48-482 rear panel help
Thanks for the responses Gary and Bob. I'm a little surprised that there's no back panel - although I know older Philco'...keithchip — 04:09 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>