Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco 84 polarized plug conversion
#1

Hello,

I am back working on my Philco 84 restore and have a question about the power connection. I am going to add a polarized plug and wanted to know if I should run the hot side to the volume/ power switch as it currently connected or to the Bakelite condenser (transformer coil) where I am going to replace the existing capacitors with .001 uf X1-Y2 safety caps.

Bob
#2

Yes, it is always better to have hot on the switch. The cap placed on the opposite side is also good as due to the inductance of the primary (the tubes not conducting) on the turn-on, it will not pull spark when the switch is closed or open.
The sch calls for 0.015uF, so the popular value being 0.01uF, this is what I use for Y-caps.
You could also experiment with adding X-cap across the line (I always do it with a parallelled 1M reisstor). In case you have interference to suppress.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#3

That model 84, at least the four tube original from the 1930s, is an AC set, so I'm not sure why you would need to add a polarized plug to it. The power switch only switches one leg of the power transformer primary, and it doesn't really matter which leg is switched.
#4

That is also true.

I just prefer to have switch on the hot in general. For a stupid situation like, say, there is a weak transformer leak to chassis, and it is always connected to the hot. Icon_lol

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
AES type of Battery Eliminator has hum in B+
Well, I like to keep it simple and didn't want to mess with perf board. Plus, the owner of this radio is a relative of a...RodB — 10:58 AM
AES type of Battery Eliminator has hum in B+
Rod Yes, your standard TO-220 LDO is good for 0.7 - 1.5W dissipation (more with a heatsink) and a small current wit...morzh — 10:11 AM
AES type of Battery Eliminator has hum in B+
Mike, I did find an LDO to give me the 90 volts and I got real excited when I discovered it but then I discovered it's ...RodB — 09:57 AM
AES type of Battery Eliminator has hum in B+
These thoughts are are all quite interesting.  I wanted to mention that I haven't tried the C- + supply yet.  I am new t...Bruce B — 09:45 AM
The list of my radio & TV collection!
Thank you very much, Arran. This is extremely useful information for me.RadioSvit — 07:54 AM
The list of my radio & TV collection!
Peter; I found an old thread on the ARF, I was wrong about when Rogers took over DeForest Crosley, it looks like it wa...Arran — 06:15 AM
The list of my radio & TV collection!
Thank you Arran, this is very interesting information. With your permission, I will definitely use it when I make a vide...RadioSvit — 04:14 AM
The list of my radio & TV collection!
Peter; For a start your DeForest Crosley 6D632 was a 1936-37 model, and I believe it had six tubes, and 3 wave bands,...Arran — 03:07 AM
AES type of Battery Eliminator has hum in B+
This is interesting, they actually designed the B+ side with some form of voltage regulation, I think? Most of the B+ su...Arran — 02:21 AM
AES type of Battery Eliminator has hum in B+
They are trying to use a regulator. Essentially it is an LDO schematic. LDOs are supposed to greatly reduce ripple, so t...morzh — 12:11 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 2867 online users. [Complete List]
» 2 Member(s) | 2865 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatar

>