Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Mon UGLY 9s262
#35

I started with a lighter stain; "perfect brown", but because I had used some wood filler on some cracks and dings, the filler came out darker than the rest so I had to go to a darker toner to cover.

Like I said, it's my first full cabinet resto and there is a learning curve to this also, but I am enjoying it and I think it will look OK.

Gene


Messages In This Thread
Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-05-2012, 09:26 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 05-05-2012, 10:06 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-05-2012, 10:17 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-05-2012, 11:19 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-07-2012, 10:32 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by morzh - 05-05-2012, 10:30 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 05-06-2012, 12:28 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by TA Forbes - 05-06-2012, 12:36 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-06-2012, 03:23 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 05-06-2012, 04:07 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-06-2012, 04:52 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 05-06-2012, 07:35 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-06-2012, 08:53 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 05-07-2012, 10:34 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-06-2012, 10:15 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-08-2012, 07:20 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 05-08-2012, 08:07 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-08-2012, 08:44 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-08-2012, 10:30 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by codefox1 - 05-09-2012, 01:47 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-09-2012, 03:00 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-09-2012, 06:37 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-20-2012, 10:02 AM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Ron Ramirez - 05-20-2012, 12:14 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-20-2012, 01:42 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by morzh - 05-20-2012, 02:07 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-20-2012, 02:17 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Ron Ramirez - 05-20-2012, 04:06 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by morzh - 05-20-2012, 07:39 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by morzh - 05-20-2012, 07:47 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-21-2012, 02:18 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-21-2012, 02:24 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-21-2012, 02:44 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by morzh - 05-21-2012, 03:57 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-21-2012, 04:57 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-21-2012, 08:59 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-21-2012, 09:27 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by morzh - 05-21-2012, 10:00 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 05-22-2012, 08:02 AM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-22-2012, 11:30 AM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Geoff - 05-22-2012, 11:48 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-23-2012, 01:07 AM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-23-2012, 06:27 AM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Geoff - 05-23-2012, 05:09 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-23-2012, 11:33 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-24-2012, 11:28 AM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 05-29-2012, 02:45 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-29-2012, 10:42 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by morzh - 05-29-2012, 11:03 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 05-30-2012, 08:06 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 06-03-2012, 09:55 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by codefox1 - 06-04-2012, 01:12 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 06-06-2012, 07:15 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 06-07-2012, 04:13 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 06-08-2012, 07:44 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 06-09-2012, 05:05 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Ron Ramirez - 06-09-2012, 10:00 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 06-10-2012, 09:01 AM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Ron Ramirez - 06-10-2012, 09:13 AM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by codefox1 - 06-10-2012, 09:40 AM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by morzh - 06-10-2012, 12:12 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Eliot Ness - 06-11-2012, 09:18 AM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Arran - 06-11-2012, 05:41 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Gene Pederson - 09-10-2012, 07:05 PM
RE: Mon UGLY 9s262 - by Joe Rossi - 09-15-2012, 08:22 AM



Users browsing this thread:
[-]
Recent Posts
Jackson 715 not working
Now that you posted the schematic, I don't know why that Sprague electrolytic cap is across the meter, as it is not indi...MrFixr55 — 05:51 PM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
What may be lacking in the PP Tube amps may be the 2nd harmonics, which some, especially RCA back in the day called &quo...MrFixr55 — 05:32 PM
Jackson 715 not working
Usually in an emission tester, the tube under test is measured as if it were a diode. So, some testers connect all the g...RodB — 04:17 PM
Restoring Philco 37-604C
Yep. F5 is green, D5 is Red. Red is Bad. Green is Clean.morzh — 01:30 PM
Jackson 715 not working
I did start to do that but I stalled out because I could not figure out how the grid and plate get voltage. In this diag...daveone23 — 11:52 AM
Restoring Philco 37-604C
(Insert Homer Simpson "DOPF" Here.) When all fails, look at the can. Took the Ron Ramirez advice, red Caig D...MrFixr55 — 09:23 AM
Philco 91 Speaker Replacement
From your text I am not sure if you intend to use the existing speaker with a resistor instead of the field coil. It wo...morzh — 08:44 AM
Philco 91 Speaker Replacement
My field coil is bad. I am still hoping to find an original, but if I can't I will go with a fitting Philco speaker, 125...dconant — 08:34 AM
Philco 91 Speaker Replacement
As Rod said, it is OK to use a fitting speaker, and then look for an original one. If you buy a Hammond 125 output tr...morzh — 08:15 AM
Philco 91 Speaker Replacement
Yes, I often have to substitute, then keep an eye out for an original. In the meantime, the radio is working and being e...RodB — 08:02 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 4768 online users. [Complete List]
» 2 Member(s) | 4766 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatar

>