Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

RF Amp or 2 IF stages?
#6

Later superhets utilized tubes that eliminated the requirement for an RF amp tube/xfrmr. Older sets had an RF amp both to increase sensitivity and to reject image. Of course there were sets that still utilized an RF amp, usually in the form of a 58, 78, 6K7 or 6L7 tube.

That being said, sets that employ two (or more, like Scott) stages of IF amplification tend to be better receivers.


Messages In This Thread
RF Amp or 2 IF stages? - by 462ron - 06-01-2013, 03:20 PM
RE: RF Amp or 2 IF stages? - by Phlogiston - 06-01-2013, 05:06 PM
RE: RF Amp or 2 IF stages? - by exray - 06-01-2013, 05:45 PM
RE: RF Amp or 2 IF stages? - by Arran - 06-01-2013, 06:04 PM
RE: RF Amp or 2 IF stages? - by 462ron - 06-01-2013, 07:44 PM
RE: RF Amp or 2 IF stages? - by TA Forbes - 06-01-2013, 09:53 PM
RE: RF Amp or 2 IF stages? - by davemc - 06-02-2013, 07:25 AM
RE: RF Amp or 2 IF stages? - by 7estatdef - 06-02-2013, 01:51 PM
RE: RF Amp or 2 IF stages? - by codefox1 - 06-02-2013, 02:38 PM
RE: RF Amp or 2 IF stages? - by Arran - 06-02-2013, 08:04 PM
RE: RF Amp or 2 IF stages? - by Mondial - 06-02-2013, 08:04 PM
RE: RF Amp or 2 IF stages? - by codefox1 - 06-03-2013, 08:56 AM
RE: RF Amp or 2 IF stages? - by Arran - 06-04-2013, 09:41 PM
RE: RF Amp or 2 IF stages? - by TA Forbes - 06-05-2013, 09:30 AM
RE: RF Amp or 2 IF stages? - by Tom Hamilton - 06-07-2013, 08:50 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)