Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Help ID parts Canadian Model 91H
#6

The CBC did not exist prior to 1937, so I'm not sure what the "License Fee" was supposedly for prior to that time. They abolished the radio license scam in the early 50s in part because few people seem to have bothered buying them. Why the limeys continue to pay fees to keep the beeb alive I will never know, they have had private TV networks since the mid 1950s. There may have been some electrical differences between a Canadian Philco 91H and a U.S 91H but they were probably minor changes to meet electrical safety standards. Also there may not have been as many revisions of the Canadian built 91s as opposed to the U.S built 91s, but I don't think they amended the circuits as much with Code # this or that back then. I have the Canadian Philco 91 service data and I am positive that it's pretty well the same as the U.S 91 electrically. It's a fairly decent radio actually, with a push-pull power output amplifier stage using a pair of #42s, so quite loud. It's an updated version of the Philco 90 circuit using more "Modern" 6.3 volt tubes.
As for the speakers they are not ruined, the 8'' one can be reconed and the 10'' repaired by careful hands. As for the missing bits like the escutcheon that's a little more difficult, as is the cabinet repair. The cabinet may be one thing that is different from the U.S built 91H as Canadian Philco quite often used regional cabinet makers rather then making them in house.
Also for a P.C case you could always find an empty console radio cabinet, there are plenty of those to go around with no chassis to match up with on craigslist and at yard sales.
Regards
Arran


Messages In This Thread
Help ID parts Canadian Model 91H - by TRusselo - 01-02-2014, 10:21 PM
RE: Help ID parts Canadian Model 91H - by morzh - 01-05-2014, 06:20 PM
RE: Help ID parts Canadian Model 91H - by Arran - 01-06-2014, 12:57 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 39-116 radio and remote
Hi Brad, Thanks so much for the info!  Do you happen to have the specs for the PT-86 transformer?  I did not find a lis...RichG — 04:32 PM
Philco 269 - 444 FIVE VALVE VERSION?
Thanks Arran; If your set has five tubes/valves then it could be an A537, V537, or a U527, then again it looks like s...ChasL0001 — 11:07 AM
Philco 29 or 45
29 chassis has a shadow meter while 45 chassis does not. Shadow meter is part no. 27 in the 29 schematic. compare it t...klondike98 — 10:32 AM
Philco 269 - 444 FIVE VALVE VERSION?
Sorry, Chas. Re the burns, I broke my first TV at the age of 3.  Between my electrical experiments :yikes: (My mom wa...MrFixr55 — 09:07 AM
Philco 41-221 Restored
Thanks for the compliment Richard. The tenite grille is original. A few of the horizontal slats were slightly warped so ...RodB — 08:44 AM
Philco 29 or 45
Hello, I have just received a Philco lowboy where the tube layout label in the cabinet says 29 or 45. There is no label ...dconant — 08:29 AM
Philco 41-221 Restored
Mr fixr, That is great news I would love to see repo grille !! I too have a very similar Philco but my cabinet has fab...radiorich — 08:22 AM
Philco 41-221 Restored
Hi Rod, I always tell people that my scars give me character.  :wink:   Great job on the radio.  Is the grille origi...MrFixr55 — 08:00 AM
Philco 269 - 444 FIVE VALVE VERSION?
It looks like the PENDD61 valve/tube must have failed, so someone replaced it with the EBC33, which is a double diode-tr...Arran — 04:29 AM
Philco 269 - 444 FIVE VALVE VERSION?
Hello Chas. Radiomuseum has information on both sets.  Thanks Gary, lots of good info there. Perhaps we'll ha...ChasL0001 — 02:23 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>