Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Kirk's Jackson Bell 62
#1

Today I was eventually able to bring myself to tackle another radio, having recuperated after the AK808A restoration - this one seriously sucked me dry of energy. Plus the closing and new house dolores de cabeza.
I chose Kirk's 62 of all the nasties that seem to creep up on me when I am not looking, like those weeping angels from "Doctor Who".

Now first I thought the power xfmr was a gonner until I realized this radio has a fuse that is also 110V/125V selector! And the fuse was open.
Now that it is bridged with a piece of wire the primary seems to be no longer open.
Which does not in itself mean the transformer is good.
The Variac-assisted test tomorrow will tell.

Meantime I am trying to make sense of the schematic.
There are two mods described in Riders, and mine seems to be the third.

I have the one where the field coil is plugged into the positive leg for filtering, but the sch in Riders shows another choke and 8uF cap which are not there, that filter plate voltage to the detector.
The first resistor to the bias filter seems to be huge wire-wound 9kOhm instead of 5kOhm shown, and I think it did not degrade as it is a wire-wound. It is a rheostat but the way it is mount I doubt it was moved.

The values shown are questionable: the two mershons on the chassis' drawing are shown to be 8uF and in the sch they are 2 and 4uF respectively.

And of course Kirk did not give me the speaker. Which has the field and the tranny. And I do not seem to have a speaker that could substitute for it.
So in fact I do not even know if the speaker is in working condition. Icon_e_confused

Oh...and the volume regulator is 18K end-to-end and all versions say 3K......minor thing, just minor......

That's my life for you.

OK. There we go.....


Messages In This Thread
Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-17-2015, 11:00 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 01-18-2015, 12:23 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 01-18-2015, 10:08 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 01-18-2015, 10:12 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-18-2015, 11:56 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-18-2015, 08:00 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 01-18-2015, 10:35 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 01-18-2015, 10:19 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-18-2015, 10:30 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-19-2015, 10:47 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 01-20-2015, 12:30 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-20-2015, 01:15 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 01-23-2015, 09:00 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-23-2015, 05:02 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 01-23-2015, 05:13 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Ron Ramirez - 01-23-2015, 10:12 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 01-24-2015, 12:29 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 01-24-2015, 08:42 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-24-2015, 08:38 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-25-2015, 07:31 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 01-25-2015, 09:06 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by hunter2115 - 01-26-2015, 07:33 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-26-2015, 08:25 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by hunter2115 - 01-26-2015, 08:43 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-26-2015, 08:52 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-26-2015, 08:56 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-26-2015, 09:21 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-02-2015, 08:23 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-02-2015, 08:52 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 02-03-2015, 12:44 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-02-2015, 09:30 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by KCMike - 02-02-2015, 10:39 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-03-2015, 08:22 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 02-05-2015, 12:16 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-03-2015, 11:55 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 02-05-2015, 12:13 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-03-2015, 12:03 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-03-2015, 12:04 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-03-2015, 04:57 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-03-2015, 10:50 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-03-2015, 11:01 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-03-2015, 11:41 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-04-2015, 09:21 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-05-2015, 11:26 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 02-07-2015, 01:09 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-05-2015, 02:11 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-05-2015, 04:16 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-05-2015, 06:58 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-05-2015, 08:07 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-05-2015, 08:26 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-05-2015, 09:33 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-06-2015, 12:24 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-06-2015, 02:55 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-06-2015, 08:51 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-06-2015, 09:55 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-06-2015, 08:39 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-06-2015, 09:07 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by KCMike - 02-06-2015, 09:20 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-06-2015, 10:04 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-06-2015, 11:29 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-07-2015, 03:53 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-07-2015, 11:34 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-08-2015, 07:12 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-08-2015, 12:36 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-08-2015, 01:30 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-08-2015, 10:06 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 02-08-2015, 11:30 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-09-2015, 07:00 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-09-2015, 10:52 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-09-2015, 11:01 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-09-2015, 04:25 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-09-2015, 05:28 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by KCMike - 02-09-2015, 06:38 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-09-2015, 06:42 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-09-2015, 08:10 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Eliot Ness - 02-10-2015, 12:00 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-09-2015, 09:08 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-10-2015, 12:05 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-10-2015, 07:11 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-10-2015, 08:44 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Eliot Ness - 02-11-2015, 01:44 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-10-2015, 10:58 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-11-2015, 09:14 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-11-2015, 11:50 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-11-2015, 11:56 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-11-2015, 01:34 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 39-116 radio and remote
Hi Brad, Thanks so much for the info!  Do you happen to have the specs for the PT-86 transformer?  I did not find a lis...RichG — 04:32 PM
Philco 269 - 444 FIVE VALVE VERSION?
Thanks Arran; If your set has five tubes/valves then it could be an A537, V537, or a U527, then again it looks like s...ChasL0001 — 11:07 AM
Philco 29 or 45
29 chassis has a shadow meter while 45 chassis does not. Shadow meter is part no. 27 in the 29 schematic. compare it t...klondike98 — 10:32 AM
Philco 269 - 444 FIVE VALVE VERSION?
Sorry, Chas. Re the burns, I broke my first TV at the age of 3.  Between my electrical experiments :yikes: (My mom wa...MrFixr55 — 09:07 AM
Philco 41-221 Restored
Thanks for the compliment Richard. The tenite grille is original. A few of the horizontal slats were slightly warped so ...RodB — 08:44 AM
Philco 29 or 45
Hello, I have just received a Philco lowboy where the tube layout label in the cabinet says 29 or 45. There is no label ...dconant — 08:29 AM
Philco 41-221 Restored
Mr fixr, That is great news I would love to see repo grille !! I too have a very similar Philco but my cabinet has fab...radiorich — 08:22 AM
Philco 41-221 Restored
Hi Rod, I always tell people that my scars give me character.  :wink:   Great job on the radio.  Is the grille origi...MrFixr55 — 08:00 AM
Philco 269 - 444 FIVE VALVE VERSION?
It looks like the PENDD61 valve/tube must have failed, so someone replaced it with the EBC33, which is a double diode-tr...Arran — 04:29 AM
Philco 269 - 444 FIVE VALVE VERSION?
Hello Chas. Radiomuseum has information on both sets.  Thanks Gary, lots of good info there. Perhaps we'll ha...ChasL0001 — 02:23 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 1981 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 1980 Guest(s)
Avatar

>