Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Kirk's Jackson Bell 62
#50

OK.


The coils all fixed.
No short in the load.

Now.
First no sound at all. Suspected the speaker.
Then upon reinserting detector tube heard the buzz when touching the grid.
Then with the screwdriver touching det grid heard reception. Weak.
Touching the previous tube gives even weaker one.
Antenna gives zero.

Well, it is a progress, good high voltage and some life.
Now. I supect part of the problem is the fild coil, might not drop enough and the output plate voltage is 340V whereas should be 225V. Could screw things up.
Even adjusted for a DMM reading it is too high.

Will try some gimmicks....


PS. Kirk, were you able to measure field resistance on your speaker?


P.P.S. Adding 2.2K in series with the FC took extra 30V from the output pate but did not improve the reception.


Messages In This Thread
Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-17-2015, 11:00 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 01-18-2015, 12:23 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 01-18-2015, 10:08 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 01-18-2015, 10:12 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-18-2015, 11:56 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-18-2015, 08:00 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 01-18-2015, 10:35 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 01-18-2015, 10:19 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-18-2015, 10:30 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-19-2015, 10:47 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 01-20-2015, 12:30 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-20-2015, 01:15 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 01-23-2015, 09:00 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-23-2015, 05:02 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 01-23-2015, 05:13 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Ron Ramirez - 01-23-2015, 10:12 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 01-24-2015, 12:29 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 01-24-2015, 08:42 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-24-2015, 08:38 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-25-2015, 07:31 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 01-25-2015, 09:06 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by hunter2115 - 01-26-2015, 07:33 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-26-2015, 08:25 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by hunter2115 - 01-26-2015, 08:43 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-26-2015, 08:52 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-26-2015, 08:56 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 01-26-2015, 09:21 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-02-2015, 08:23 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-02-2015, 08:52 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 02-03-2015, 12:44 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-02-2015, 09:30 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by KCMike - 02-02-2015, 10:39 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-03-2015, 08:22 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 02-05-2015, 12:16 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-03-2015, 11:55 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 02-05-2015, 12:13 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-03-2015, 12:03 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-03-2015, 12:04 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-03-2015, 04:57 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-03-2015, 10:50 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-03-2015, 11:01 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-03-2015, 11:41 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-04-2015, 09:21 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-05-2015, 11:26 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 02-07-2015, 01:09 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-05-2015, 02:11 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-05-2015, 04:16 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-05-2015, 06:58 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-05-2015, 08:07 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-05-2015, 08:26 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-05-2015, 09:33 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-06-2015, 12:24 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-06-2015, 02:55 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-06-2015, 08:51 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-06-2015, 09:55 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-06-2015, 08:39 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-06-2015, 09:07 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by KCMike - 02-06-2015, 09:20 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-06-2015, 10:04 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-06-2015, 11:29 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-07-2015, 03:53 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-07-2015, 11:34 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-08-2015, 07:12 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-08-2015, 12:36 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-08-2015, 01:30 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-08-2015, 10:06 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Arran - 02-08-2015, 11:30 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-09-2015, 07:00 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-09-2015, 10:52 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-09-2015, 11:01 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-09-2015, 04:25 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-09-2015, 05:28 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by KCMike - 02-09-2015, 06:38 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-09-2015, 06:42 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-09-2015, 08:10 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Eliot Ness - 02-10-2015, 12:00 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-09-2015, 09:08 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-10-2015, 12:05 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by OldRestorer - 02-10-2015, 07:11 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-10-2015, 08:44 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by Eliot Ness - 02-11-2015, 01:44 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-10-2015, 10:58 PM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-11-2015, 09:14 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-11-2015, 11:50 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by sam - 02-11-2015, 11:56 AM
RE: Kirk's Jackson Bell 62 - by morzh - 02-11-2015, 01:34 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 39-116 radio and remote
Hi Brad, Thanks so much for the info!  Do you happen to have the specs for the PT-86 transformer?  I did not find a lis...RichG — 04:32 PM
Philco 269 - 444 FIVE VALVE VERSION?
Thanks Arran; If your set has five tubes/valves then it could be an A537, V537, or a U527, then again it looks like s...ChasL0001 — 11:07 AM
Philco 29 or 45
29 chassis has a shadow meter while 45 chassis does not. Shadow meter is part no. 27 in the 29 schematic. compare it t...klondike98 — 10:32 AM
Philco 269 - 444 FIVE VALVE VERSION?
Sorry, Chas. Re the burns, I broke my first TV at the age of 3.  Between my electrical experiments :yikes: (My mom wa...MrFixr55 — 09:07 AM
Philco 41-221 Restored
Thanks for the compliment Richard. The tenite grille is original. A few of the horizontal slats were slightly warped so ...RodB — 08:44 AM
Philco 29 or 45
Hello, I have just received a Philco lowboy where the tube layout label in the cabinet says 29 or 45. There is no label ...dconant — 08:29 AM
Philco 41-221 Restored
Mr fixr, That is great news I would love to see repo grille !! I too have a very similar Philco but my cabinet has fab...radiorich — 08:22 AM
Philco 41-221 Restored
Hi Rod, I always tell people that my scars give me character.  :wink:   Great job on the radio.  Is the grille origi...MrFixr55 — 08:00 AM
Philco 269 - 444 FIVE VALVE VERSION?
It looks like the PENDD61 valve/tube must have failed, so someone replaced it with the EBC33, which is a double diode-tr...Arran — 04:29 AM
Philco 269 - 444 FIVE VALVE VERSION?
Hello Chas. Radiomuseum has information on both sets.  Thanks Gary, lots of good info there. Perhaps we'll ha...ChasL0001 — 02:23 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 1980 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 1979 Guest(s)
Avatar

>