Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Differences between 46-200 and 48-200
#14

BDM Wrote:Got to agree with the Philco guru's Ron and Doug Icon_mrgreen Stick with the 1934/35 or 36 models. The 1937/38 sets with "RF subchassis" decks can be somewhat of a challenge to work on for beginners. Though no rubber wiring, they're a delicate operation. I have an almost complete model series for 1936, exception being the 630 & 680. Love them all, and their performance is second to none for consumer sets. I prefer the model 620 and up. They have an RF amplifier section. The 610 lacks this, and sensitivity in comparison.
Thanks for piping in your knowldedge. Icon_biggrin I'll start keeping my eye out for the 1934/35 or 36 models, especially the 620 and up.

I guess one thing I have to remember is that even a restored radio of this type will probably need a bit more upkeep than the transister radios I am used to. I don't want to end up with a maintenance nightmare!


Messages In This Thread
Re: Differences between 46-200 and 48-200 - by scooby214 - 01-03-2009, 09:46 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)