Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

RF but no IF on 610
#26

Since others are explaining their methods for doing a rough tune in of the IF transformers on a radio where they have been tweaked badly out of alignment, here is a method I have found to work on radios which use a 6K7 IF amp and a 6A8 mixer oscillator. It can be modified to use on most any radio.

Start by turning the tuning condenser until the plates are meshed. Next remove the 6A8 tube from the radio. Turn on the signal generator. Set it for INTERNAL modulation, so the AM frequency has a tone modulating it. Let it sit for at least 20 minutes to stabilize well. Using a good, accurate frequency counter make sure of the accuracy of your signal generator's setting to the appropriate IF frequency. You can alternately use a good digital readout radio to check this using the first harmonic, 910KC for 455KC IF, 920KC for 460KC IF, 940KC for 470KC, etc. Tune the signal generator until you hear the loudest signal coming through the radio. Now, with the signal generator set for the highest output, connect the output THROUGH A 0.01 MFD CAP to the grid of the 6K7 tube, which will inject the modulated IF frequency into the IF amplifier. Now you can tune the 2nd IF transformer until you hear the loudest signal pass through.

Next put back the 6A8 and connect the same output from the signal generator through the .01 MFD cap to the grid of the 6A8 tube, and repeat the same procedure on the 1st IF transformer.

This will get you into the close ball park, and from there you can follow whatever the instructions are given in the radio's documentation for final IF alignment.


Messages In This Thread
RF but no IF on 610 - by Patrick - 04-02-2021, 09:20 AM
RE: RF but no IF on 610 - by Radioroslyn - 04-02-2021, 11:00 AM
RE: RF but no IF on 610 - by Patrick - 04-02-2021, 11:06 AM
RE: RF but no IF on 610 - by Radioroslyn - 04-02-2021, 11:07 AM
RE: RF but no IF on 610 - by Patrick - 04-02-2021, 11:10 AM
RE: RF but no IF on 610 - by Radioroslyn - 04-02-2021, 11:23 AM
RE: RF but no IF on 610 - by Patrick - 04-02-2021, 11:28 AM
RE: RF but no IF on 610 - by Radioroslyn - 04-02-2021, 11:38 AM
RE: RF but no IF on 610 - by Patrick - 04-02-2021, 12:17 PM
RE: RF but no IF on 610 - by morzh - 04-02-2021, 12:54 PM
RE: RF but no IF on 610 - by Patrick - 04-02-2021, 01:38 PM
RE: RF but no IF on 610 - by morzh - 04-02-2021, 01:42 PM
RE: RF but no IF on 610 - by Patrick - 04-02-2021, 01:58 PM
RE: RF but no IF on 610 - by morzh - 04-02-2021, 02:21 PM
RE: RF but no IF on 610 - by morzh - 04-02-2021, 02:31 PM
RE: RF but no IF on 610 - by Patrick - 04-02-2021, 03:23 PM
RE: RF but no IF on 610 - by Chas - 04-02-2021, 04:22 PM
RE: RF but no IF on 610 - by morzh - 04-02-2021, 06:15 PM
RE: RF but no IF on 610 - by Chas - 04-02-2021, 07:21 PM
RE: RF but no IF on 610 - by morzh - 04-02-2021, 07:24 PM
RE: RF but no IF on 610 - by Steve Davis - 04-02-2021, 07:47 PM
RE: RF but no IF on 610 - by morzh - 04-02-2021, 07:54 PM
RE: RF but no IF on 610 - by John Bartley - 04-02-2021, 08:17 PM
RE: RF but no IF on 610 - by Chas - 04-02-2021, 08:57 PM
RE: RF but no IF on 610 - by morzh - 04-02-2021, 09:04 PM
RE: RF but no IF on 610 - by mikethedruid - 04-02-2021, 09:07 PM
RE: RF but no IF on 610 - by Patrick - 04-02-2021, 09:14 PM
RE: RF but no IF on 610 - by morzh - 04-02-2021, 09:19 PM
RE: RF but no IF on 610 - by BrendaAnnD - 04-03-2021, 02:54 AM
RE: RF but no IF on 610 - by Patrick - 04-03-2021, 05:26 AM
RE: RF but no IF on 610 - by Paul Philco322 - 04-03-2021, 06:44 AM
RE: RF but no IF on 610 - by Patrick - 04-03-2021, 07:07 AM
RE: RF but no IF on 610 - by morzh - 04-03-2021, 09:29 AM
RE: RF but no IF on 610 - by morzh - 04-03-2021, 09:33 AM
RE: RF but no IF on 610 - by Patrick - 04-03-2021, 10:38 AM
RE: RF but no IF on 610 - by morzh - 04-03-2021, 12:02 PM
RE: RF but no IF on 610 - by Patrick - 04-03-2021, 01:58 PM
RE: RF but no IF on 610 - by mikethedruid - 04-03-2021, 04:03 PM
RE: RF but no IF on 610 - by morzh - 04-03-2021, 04:36 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 39-116 radio and remote
Hi Brad, Thanks so much for the info!  Do you happen to have the specs for the PT-86 transformer?  I did not find a lis...RichG — 04:32 PM
Philco 269 - 444 FIVE VALVE VERSION?
Thanks Arran; If your set has five tubes/valves then it could be an A537, V537, or a U527, then again it looks like s...ChasL0001 — 11:07 AM
Philco 29 or 45
29 chassis has a shadow meter while 45 chassis does not. Shadow meter is part no. 27 in the 29 schematic. compare it t...klondike98 — 10:32 AM
Philco 269 - 444 FIVE VALVE VERSION?
Sorry, Chas. Re the burns, I broke my first TV at the age of 3.  Between my electrical experiments :yikes: (My mom wa...MrFixr55 — 09:07 AM
Philco 41-221 Restored
Thanks for the compliment Richard. The tenite grille is original. A few of the horizontal slats were slightly warped so ...RodB — 08:44 AM
Philco 29 or 45
Hello, I have just received a Philco lowboy where the tube layout label in the cabinet says 29 or 45. There is no label ...dconant — 08:29 AM
Philco 41-221 Restored
Mr fixr, That is great news I would love to see repo grille !! I too have a very similar Philco but my cabinet has fab...radiorich — 08:22 AM
Philco 41-221 Restored
Hi Rod, I always tell people that my scars give me character.  :wink:   Great job on the radio.  Is the grille origi...MrFixr55 — 08:00 AM
Philco 269 - 444 FIVE VALVE VERSION?
It looks like the PENDD61 valve/tube must have failed, so someone replaced it with the EBC33, which is a double diode-tr...Arran — 04:29 AM
Philco 269 - 444 FIVE VALVE VERSION?
Hello Chas. Radiomuseum has information on both sets.  Thanks Gary, lots of good info there. Perhaps we'll ha...ChasL0001 — 02:23 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 1981 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 1980 Guest(s)
Avatar

>