Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

philco 42-1012
#16

Murf, did you try to realign the set again. When I got my 42-400 first running, the volume was only about half of what it should be. The very first adjustment I made on it was at that #4 IF can,(first thing on the adjustment procedures), and lo and behold, that was it. (it was 99% tight, but that final 1% tightening did the trick- kind of strange that it worked full bore tight. All bands functioned normally). Not saying that is your problem, but a little food for thought, maybe.


Messages In This Thread
philco 42-1012 - by murf - 01-05-2013, 11:21 PM
RE: philco 42-1012 - by TA Forbes - 01-06-2013, 01:41 AM
RE: philco 42-1012 - by shawn - 01-16-2013, 08:48 PM
RE: philco 42-1012 - by murf - 01-16-2013, 09:00 PM
RE: philco 42-1012 - by TA Forbes - 01-16-2013, 09:02 PM
RE: philco 42-1012 - by murf - 01-16-2013, 10:33 PM
RE: philco 42-1012 - by murf - 01-24-2013, 10:53 PM
RE: philco 42-1012 - by TA Forbes - 01-24-2013, 11:44 PM
RE: philco 42-1012 - by Arran - 01-25-2013, 02:00 AM
RE: philco 42-1012 - by murf - 01-27-2013, 05:13 PM
RE: philco 42-1012 - by Electrothaumaturgist - 01-30-2013, 03:54 PM
RE: philco 42-1012 - by Arran - 01-30-2013, 09:24 PM
RE: philco 42-1012 - by murf - 01-30-2013, 09:45 PM
RE: philco 42-1012 - by codefox1 - 01-31-2013, 01:06 PM
RE: philco 42-1012 - by murf - 01-31-2013, 05:19 PM
RE: philco 42-1012 - by Electrothaumaturgist - 01-31-2013, 08:02 PM
RE: philco 42-1012 - by murf - 01-31-2013, 08:14 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)