Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

I need a good picture of the Patent Label for a 38-7
#1

I took a picture of the label on my chassis but when I needed it to reproduce a new label, the picture was blurry! I need to be more careful. Can anybody either post a close up or email me a picture of the patent label? Much appreciated.

Crist
#2

Hi Crist,

Any chance it's the same as the 37-xxx models?

I had this photo of the patent label on my 37-116:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B64cfW...DhaNkJadEk

Here's a repro label I created from it:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B64cfW...1VyOEFybm8

[Edit: links have been fixed]
#3

Nathan,
No, it is not the same. I have your label already which I used for my 60B project. It worked very well. what I did was to scan it as a jpeg and then reworked it slightly to have the correct part number. I'll do the same for the 38-7. Except the picture was to blurry to read the numbers! That's why I need a clear picture of the label.
Your stuff is top notch and much appreciated in our hobby. thanks again.

Crist
#4

Oh - that's right. I remember now about your 60B.  Icon_thumbup

So I looked through photos I've saved from various models - found this picture of the patent label from a 38-12:
   

Can you get what you need from that?

And wow you need a magnifying glass to read it - no wonder it's hard to find a good picture of one.
#5

That's it! Thanks. Yeah, a better picture would be great. At least it's a start.
Thanks.

Crist
#6

Hi Christ,
Here is the label off of my 38-7.  It has a lot of brown stains that I can't wipe of, I suspect the paper is stained.  Also, as luck would have it, last week I pushed on the one spot where there is a hollow under the label, and that created the circular tear in the middle.  So I don't know if this is much help, but it definitely is a 37-8.
Let me know if the photo doesn't comes through, I've never posted a photo before.


Attached Files Image(s)
   
#7

Yeah, the picture came through! That's it. I'll use this one as my seed and see what I can come up with.
Thanks.

Crist




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Jackson 715 not working
Now that you posted the schematic, I don't know why that Sprague electrolytic cap is across the meter, as it is not indi...MrFixr55 — 05:51 PM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
What may be lacking in the PP Tube amps may be the 2nd harmonics, which some, especially RCA back in the day called &quo...MrFixr55 — 05:32 PM
Jackson 715 not working
Usually in an emission tester, the tube under test is measured as if it were a diode. So, some testers connect all the g...RodB — 04:17 PM
Restoring Philco 37-604C
Yep. F5 is green, D5 is Red. Red is Bad. Green is Clean.morzh — 01:30 PM
Jackson 715 not working
I did start to do that but I stalled out because I could not figure out how the grid and plate get voltage. In this diag...daveone23 — 11:52 AM
Restoring Philco 37-604C
(Insert Homer Simpson "DOPF" Here.) When all fails, look at the can. Took the Ron Ramirez advice, red Caig D...MrFixr55 — 09:23 AM
Philco 91 Speaker Replacement
From your text I am not sure if you intend to use the existing speaker with a resistor instead of the field coil. It wo...morzh — 08:44 AM
Philco 91 Speaker Replacement
My field coil is bad. I am still hoping to find an original, but if I can't I will go with a fitting Philco speaker, 125...dconant — 08:34 AM
Philco 91 Speaker Replacement
As Rod said, it is OK to use a fitting speaker, and then look for an original one. If you buy a Hammond 125 output tr...morzh — 08:15 AM
Philco 91 Speaker Replacement
Yes, I often have to substitute, then keep an eye out for an original. In the meantime, the radio is working and being e...RodB — 08:02 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>