Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Starting on Philco 111.
#1

http://www.philcoradio.com/gallery/1930a.htm#c

This is the one I went to Springfield MA this last fall for.
It is this lowboy cabinet (the link above). I thought it is 96.
But there are no labels on either radio or the chassis.

If anyone knows exactly please let me know. I could probably research it but it is easier if someone already knows the answer.

Now here are the chassis' photos, maybe this will help to identify it.

   
   
   
   

So which one is it?
#2

Looks like a 111 or early 112 to me.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#3

A-ha! ys th cabint I guess was the same between all these lowboy models.

Thanks Ron, 111 then it shall be from now on!
#4

http://www.philcoradio.com/gallery/1931a.htm#c

As you can see in the link above, the 111 was sold as a lowboy in the same cabinet as 1930 Philco lowboys.

Congratulations, you have the best of the bunch of lowboys of that cabinet style. Icon_thumbup

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#5

Wow. This radio is a monster! 11 tubes. And the detector is not the plate type.
I suspect it might be a nice player.
Ron, what's your opinion of these?


PS. Just read your post. Still, if you know how they perform I 'd be interested in your prediciton.
PPS. the speaker I bought for 15 bucks plus shipping is from the 2x45 Push-Pull output radio with the same cabinet and looks the same as the on in th cabint so I have a spare.
#6

More photos.

The radio was never touched, perhaps 3 tubes replaced - other are Philco balloons. Inside clean, the chassis itself has no rust whatsoever. Just dust.

   
   
   
   
#7

I find it amazing when something that old is so original.

The artist formerly known as Puhpow! 8)
#8

Yep. It is in great shape, the cabinet is in very decent shape too, I do not think it requires full refinish, AND I paid 75 bucks for it, I think.
Of course there was a trip....but since I ended up visiting with a friend I do not count the trip cost towards this radio. Icon_lol
#9

morzh Wrote:Still, if you know how they perform I 'd be interested in your prediciton.

Five words - You're going to love it.

In my opinion...the 111 and 112, along with the 1932 model 15 (which is essentially the same radio only with 6.3 volt tubes) are the very best AM-only radios Philco ever built. RF stage, two IF stages, and a "normal-maximum" switch for sensitivity. They are amazing performers. Actually, I think the 111 and 112 are both better than the 15. Again...my opinion. Anyway, there is a lot to like about these sets. Great performers.

The only drawback: They only tune as high as 1520 kc, and as low as 550, so you lose part of the modern AM band on both ends (mainly the high end). But as long as you don't have any AM stations you want to listen to at 540 kc or above 1520 or so, yep...you're going to love it.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#10

Thanks, Ron, I am thrilled.
When I looked at the detector I thought that at least this part should be good.
Well, off to backelite recapping tomorrow!
#11

Yes, the 111 has a 27 tube wired as a diode, used as a second detector and AVC diode. So you won't have the distortion issues in the 111 that you have in the early 70 and early 90.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#12

I am so looking forward to it playing.
#13

My 111 chassis has a toggle switch on the right hand side that's visible when looking from the rear. Anyone know what this might be for?


Craig R


Attached Files Image(s)
   
#14

I restored one of these about 4 years ago for someone local
here who had heard that I worked on old radios.

It came out working very well, good sound!

Herb S.
Ithaca NY
#15

I believe that is the local / distance switch.

Be sure to check all of the resistors carefully. There were a lot of bad ones in my 111. And Philco's color code is sometimes a problem as well, since they used colors like grey and dark grey (battle ship grey) for two very different values.

   

"I just might turn into smoke, but I feel fine"
http://www.russoldradios.com/




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Jackson 715 not working
Now that you posted the schematic, I don't know why that Sprague electrolytic cap is across the meter, as it is not indi...MrFixr55 — 05:51 PM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
What may be lacking in the PP Tube amps may be the 2nd harmonics, which some, especially RCA back in the day called &quo...MrFixr55 — 05:32 PM
Jackson 715 not working
Usually in an emission tester, the tube under test is measured as if it were a diode. So, some testers connect all the g...RodB — 04:17 PM
Restoring Philco 37-604C
Yep. F5 is green, D5 is Red. Red is Bad. Green is Clean.morzh — 01:30 PM
Jackson 715 not working
I did start to do that but I stalled out because I could not figure out how the grid and plate get voltage. In this diag...daveone23 — 11:52 AM
Restoring Philco 37-604C
(Insert Homer Simpson "DOPF" Here.) When all fails, look at the can. Took the Ron Ramirez advice, red Caig D...MrFixr55 — 09:23 AM
Philco 91 Speaker Replacement
From your text I am not sure if you intend to use the existing speaker with a resistor instead of the field coil. It wo...morzh — 08:44 AM
Philco 91 Speaker Replacement
My field coil is bad. I am still hoping to find an original, but if I can't I will go with a fitting Philco speaker, 125...dconant — 08:34 AM
Philco 91 Speaker Replacement
As Rod said, it is OK to use a fitting speaker, and then look for an original one. If you buy a Hammond 125 output tr...morzh — 08:15 AM
Philco 91 Speaker Replacement
Yes, I often have to substitute, then keep an eye out for an original. In the meantime, the radio is working and being e...RodB — 08:02 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 3661 online users. [Complete List]
» 2 Member(s) | 3659 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatar

>