Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

UX201 or UV199 Substitute
#10

OK, I have posted pictures and videos of the substitute tubes in action.

My one conclusion that is not in the blog is that the sub may actually be more suited to a low performing tube rather than the NOS ones I was using - closer to 600 Gm.

Don't forget to like the blog post. These posts take days to prepare.

https://www.russoldradios.com/blog

"I just might turn into smoke, but I feel fine"
http://www.russoldradios.com/


Messages In This Thread
UX201 or UV199 Substitute - by Phlogiston - 12-04-2017, 03:03 PM
RE: UX201 or 01A Subsistute - by Arran - 12-06-2017, 12:01 AM
RE: UX201 or 01A Subsistute - by Radioroslyn - 12-06-2017, 10:24 AM
RE: UX201 or 01A Subsistute - by Phlogiston - 12-06-2017, 11:05 AM
RE: UX201 or 01A Subsistute - by Ron Ramirez - 12-06-2017, 12:34 PM
RE: UX201 or 01A Subsistute - by Phlogiston - 12-06-2017, 01:18 PM
RE: UX201 or 01A Subsistute - by Arran - 12-07-2017, 12:01 AM
RE: UX201 or 01A Subsistute - by Phlogiston - 12-07-2017, 11:05 AM
RE: UX201 or 01A Substitute - by Arran - 12-07-2017, 11:11 PM
RE: UX201 or 01A Substitute - by Phlogiston - 12-08-2017, 12:01 PM
RE: UX201 or UV199 Substitute - by Arran - 12-10-2017, 01:51 AM
RE: UX201 or UV199 Substitute - by Phlogiston - 12-10-2017, 10:06 AM
RE: UX201 or UV199 Substitute - by Arran - 12-10-2017, 11:49 PM
RE: UX201 or UV199 Substitute - by Phlogiston - 12-11-2017, 10:29 AM
RE: UX201 or UV199 Substitute - by Arran - 12-12-2017, 05:26 AM
RE: UX201 or UV199 Substitute - by Phlogiston - 12-12-2017, 10:55 AM
RE: UX201 or UV199 Substitute - by Arran - 12-13-2017, 02:51 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)