Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

bakelite block question
#1

Working on a 38-116 code 125 and have a question concerning bakelite blk. number 46.
This is a 4989SG which is listed on the parts list as having a single .1 uf cap.
If you look on the handy reference guide that I printed out from the Philco site, it does not list a 4989SG.
Anyone know what the proper wiring would be as far as the new .1 cap.
Lugs 1 to 2 or lugs 1 to 3 ?
Thanks,
murf
#2

According to Ray Bintliff's book "Philco condensers and more", the 4989SG block contains one .09 cap connected from lug 1 to 3.
#3

Guess the parts list is wrong?
#4

After looking farther, I see there is a 4989DG that is not listed as well.
Schematic view and the parts list only show 3 blocks instead of the 6 or 7 blks that are used in the chassis.
What's up ?
Murf
#5

And according to "Condensers and more" the 4989 DG is two .09 condensers, first is lug 1 to 2, second is lug 1 to 3. Lug 1 goes to chassis ground.
#6

Quote:Guess the parts list is wrong?


.09 or .1   same thing.



Steve

M R Radios   C M Tubes
#7

Oh yeah. Close enough for me.
#8

OK, thanks for the info Doc.
I guess the others that are not shown on the schematics will have to be done using the number marked on the block.
Wish it were clearly marked on the schematics so there is no guess work involved.
Thanks again,
Murf
#9

(04-10-2017, 07:54 PM)Steve Davis Wrote:  .09 or .1   same thing.

Kinda figured that was the case.
Any idea why the rest of the blocks are not shown on the schematics ?
Don't want to guess on these, it is too much work to re-do these.
Thanks Steve,
Murf
#10

I took a look at the schematic and saw only one #46 cap, screen bypass for the IF amp stage. The parts list sez it's a .1mfd (probably 400v) it doesn't say dual so I'm thinking it's a single unit. Have a look at the eyelet to see if the center terminal has a wire coming up thru it.
As mention .09 hasn't been a standard value for a million years.

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
#11

Hi Terry,
Yes I can see the leads coming thru the rivets, but why don't they show all of the Bakelite blocks on the schematics?
Hate guess work.
Thanks,
Murf
#12

As im sure you all knew... Doc is right on the two cap blocks info. Just wanted to put my 2 cents worth in. Icon_smile
#13

Ok....
Does resistor #45 connect between the two ungrounded terminal of 46??

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
#14

(04-10-2017, 09:39 PM)Radioroslyn Wrote:  Ok....
Does resistor #45 connect between the two ungrounded terminal of 46??

Yes there is.
Started recapping the blocks today.
So far so good. 3 down and 3 to go.
Murf
#15

Ok The other cap in that block is #9 a .05 (a 473 in these new fangled numbers). This is what the schematic shows, parts layout sez different. Having a extra .05mf isn't going to make any difference.

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Hickok 288x
They worked for 85 years as .05's and my other machine which operated perfectly has them. Doubt thats the issue. Yes saf...daveone23 — 09:01 AM
462ron
LOL@ MrFixr. I remember an encounter with my first tube radio.. I think I have posted this before. Back when I knew just...462ron — 08:07 AM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
I absolutely attribute my reaching 63 to God's benevolence, but this apart, it has never occurred to me to tap anything ...morzh — 07:55 AM
Does the 20 Deluxe use photofinish?
No, it did not use photo-finish. It is veneer with the shading on the front of changing darkness.morzh — 07:52 AM
Philco 66 No Plate Voltage
We could also mention the factory miswire of the tweeters on 38-690. Or the fact that even with this fixed, one could no...morzh — 07:51 AM
462ron
Just a thought here, those caps C33-C34 are .05mfd. That high of a value can possibly pass enough 60hz current to cause ...462ron — 07:37 AM
Hickok 288x
Isnt the chassis and ground the same on this machine? My other 288x that works is an identical machine and it does not h...daveone23 — 07:05 AM
Just got a 49-1613 need to know...everything!
According to the gallery, it has an AM/FM radio, with a two speed phonograph, the 78 side is an automatic changer, the 3...Arran — 01:32 AM
Philco 37-???
During the 1937 and 38 model years Philco was big on the concept of what would now be called a "modular" desig...Arran — 12:23 AM
Replicating (dogbone) resistors what method have you used ?
Hello Dale, I am talking about using the RTV as the mold. Well John, yes, I have seen that design I think it was one o...radiorich — 11:55 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 2833 online users. [Complete List]
» 2 Member(s) | 2831 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatar

>