Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Model 90 Cathedral stopped receiving
#1

I acquired a Philco 90 Cathedral.
With all your help I have progressed nicely, but have now taken 2 steps back...
The unit received stations when I got it. Now it does not.
It has always had a problem with the volume control. Very scratchy and intermittent.
(Should I replaced this? Can an original be located? Can I used a modern pot?)

Since, then, this is what I have done:
Changed power cord.
Added metal shield
Cleaned all the bugs and crap out and off of it.
   (I blew it off and used contact cleaner.)
Replaced the type 24 tube. (Det-Osc)
   (The tube did not light up anymore.)
   (The one under the 3 tube shield.)
Changed the Pilot light. (used an E10 6.3 volt)

Gee, here I thought I was doing great things for it, and now it is mad at me.
Maybe all the dirt was holding it together?

Anyway, any suggestions on where to start troubleshooting would be very appreciated.


Attached Files Image(s)
   

Scott Jensen
(ZboltMan)
[b]For maximum attention, nothing beats a good mistake[/b]
#2

Do you still have audio?
Can you pass RF signal through it and get the tone?

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#3

Have you changed the electrolytic caps?
#4

They look like they have been changed.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#5

The speaker humms and makes the scratchy sound when adjusting the volume.
I will need to learn how to put RF into this.

Scott Jensen
(ZboltMan)
[b]For maximum attention, nothing beats a good mistake[/b]
#6

That sounds like a great idea.
My question is this:
Is it OK to put new style caps into a restoration project?
Do I need to find old replicas?

Scott Jensen
(ZboltMan)
[b]For maximum attention, nothing beats a good mistake[/b]
#7

It is OK to put any part that meets the electrical specs.
It is up to you if you want to make the replica parts (restuff caps, overmold resistors) or buy them, it is not required for the radio to work,

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#8

If you are referring to the shiny caps, they are not replaced; I just polished the tops...

Scott Jensen
(ZboltMan)
[b]For maximum attention, nothing beats a good mistake[/b]
#9

Quote:If you are referring to the shiny caps, they are not replaced; I just polished the tops...
No, Mike (morzh) is referring to the two electrolytic capacitors circled in red below:

   

They are obviously not the original capacitors so they were replaced at some time.

As far as your radio not receiving it could be as simple as a bad tube or some other component.  The most commonly replaced items in these old radios are capacitors, resistors, and tubes.

First make sure no wires came loose when you cleaned the chassis... take a slow long look with a strong light (emphasis on long and slow) looking for anything amiss.  Also, just for kicks put that old 24 tube back in and see what happens.  Sometimes it's hard to see the filaments glow and it is possible you swapped out a good tube with a dud.

Then report back with a picture of the bottom of the chassis if you don't mind.  As far as the volume being scratchy you might be able to clear that up with a squirt of WD-40 into the pot if you can find any openings.

One more thing, are thopse screw tops on the two capacitors I circled in red?  If so unscrew them and take a good picture for us...thanks!

John KK4ZLF
Lexington, KY
"illegitimis non carborundum"
#10

What John said.

And...those you polished are not caps by any stretch. Those are RF coils.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#11

Here are pics of the capacitors and underneath.


Attached Files Image(s)
           

Scott Jensen
(ZboltMan)
[b]For maximum attention, nothing beats a good mistake[/b]
#12

The capacitors were replaced at some point, judging by the inside caps - in 40-s or maybe 50s.
They need to come out and be replaced by new ones.
As long as you are at it - they seemed to have not cleaned the insides well: the perforates polastic sheet has to be either removed or washed very well.
I also recommend soaking the cylinders in vinegar, it will take care of the green stuff.
Then re-assemble with the new caps.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#13

Scott, Mike is correct, those capacitors in the cans are (older) replacement electrolytic capacitors and should be replaced at some point if you plan to play the radio very often, but it would be nice if we could get the radio working again before you start replacing a lot of parts.  Below I have labeled some of the parts underneath the chassis and will explain what those components are:
   

Your radio looks like it is an older restoration, but most of the capacitors they used are due for replacement.  I have some of those that are NOS and even unused they measure a high level of leakage.

1:  These are Bakelite blocks that contain paper capacitors, I have only labeled one, but you can see there are many.

2:  These are (older) replacement paper capacitors that that were used to replace the capacitors in the Bakelite blocks.  Instead of putting them inside the blocks they just soldered them on top of the blocks.  I can't tell from the pictures, but the problem with doing that is if you don't disconnect the old blocks that old capacitance will effect the new capacitors.  At any rate, at some point in time, all the capacitors in the blocks and those jumpered on top will need to be replaced.

3.  This is a large wire wound resistor with several taps on it (part# 58 on the schematic).  Yours looks to be in nice shape but an open in one of the sections could kill the radio.

4.  These are resistors, we call them dog bone resistors today.  I didn't label them all but enough so you should be able to ID the rest.  These typically creep higher in value and if 10 or 20% higher than marked should eventually be replaced.

The easiest fix is a bad tube or maybe one that isn't seated well in its socket.  Pulling them out one at a time, cleaning the pins with scotchbrite and reseating is not a bad idea.  Have you tried putting the old #24 back in the radio yet?  If you have access to a tube tester it would be a good idea to test them.

EDIT:  If you need schematics and part lists PM me your email address and I'll send you some hi-res copies.

Edit2:  Rather than regurgitate what has already been covered here are some links you might find helpful:

The first is a restoration of a model 90:

https://mcclellans.com/Philco90Restoration.htm

Another restoration thread by Steve Davis.  Although this is a push-pull 47 chassis you'll find many similarities:

https://philcoradio.com/phorum/showthread.php?tid=20685

From the Philco library this tells you what is inside each of those Bakelite blocks:

https://web.archive.org/web/201702271004...lokcap.htm

And here Mike (morzh) describes the no-mess method of re-stuffing those Bakelite blocks with fresh capacitors:

https://philcoradio.com/library/index.ph...soldering/

John KK4ZLF
Lexington, KY
"illegitimis non carborundum"
#14

Need some help with the Volume POT here.
Pulled a lead off of it; it measures about 706Kohm
Part# C.T.S. 5366-F  series # 40
OK, I looked thru the Riders manuals and any schematics I could find and no where does it give the specs for this pot.
Please help me to verify the resistance of this .
Also, could you folks tell me if it is linear taper or audio taper?

I also searched all the documents and resources at philcoradio.com and did not find part # 5366


Attached Files Image(s)
   

Scott Jensen
(ZboltMan)
[b]For maximum attention, nothing beats a good mistake[/b]
#15

I'm sorry Mike, I am still learning.
Really thought I was only posting in this Electronic Restoration thread.
Could not locate the other one you are mentioning.

Scott Jensen
(ZboltMan)
[b]For maximum attention, nothing beats a good mistake[/b]




Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
Tim, nice write up and thanks for sharing !! Sincerely Richardradiorich — 02:47 AM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
Well, this was a real "Hum-Dinger" :lol: ! This will be kinda long, but hopefully it will help others having t...TV MAN — 01:55 AM
Shadow Meter Bulb
Phorum members, I am trying to find the bulb # for PHILCO Shadow Meter part number 45-2180 that is from a 37-640 chassis...georgetownjohn — 06:53 PM
Philco 41-608 changer coupler
3D-printing...short of machining, of course. Or molding.morzh — 05:20 PM
Philco 41-608 changer coupler
Thanks, Morzh. That solves the issue of the rubber pieces. Now, I need to find a way to replicate the pot metal piec...alangard — 05:07 PM
12' Philco
If it is 12', either Kareem or Andre would have to jump pretty high to look at the front panel. Kareem would have an e...morzh — 01:48 PM
12' Philco
And here's a story about the tires on the truck. Same "no-stoop" guy must have installed these! Take care a...GarySP — 01:17 PM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
I think they have only shown the secondaries of the transformer. Two of them feed the rectifiers' filaments.morzh — 12:58 PM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
Arran If the wire inside cans is the gauges you mentioned, the sole reason for that would be mechanical, to stiffen t...morzh — 12:56 PM
12' Philco
Rod, Yes, I know, but the Giant Philco is not around anymore either, so I go by whoever was alive fairly recently. H...morzh — 12:54 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>