Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Question on Cap Voltage Rating
#1

I have two Philcos on my bench: a 37-630 and a 38-60. The tone control circuits and associated capacitor values are identical in these radios. All caps are original. <https://philcoradio.com/library/download...l.%202.pdf). The in the 37-630 the capacitor from the output tube plate to the tone control is 0.008mfd at 400 volts (that point is shorted to ground in one tone control setting). The capacitor from the tone control to ground is 0.03mfd at 600 volts.
 
In the 38-60, the 0.008mfd capacitor is rated at 1600 volts. The 0.03mfd cap is a bakelite block (8328 SU), and thus no published voltage rating. I have read in the Philco Repair Bench article on on rebuilding bakelite block caps that all of these caps are rated at 400 volts so that they can be used in any position.

For both radios I was planning on using a 0.0068mfd at 1600 volts for the 0.008 (what I have in stock - 15% low), and a 0.033mfd at 630 volts for rebuilding the 0.03mfd cap. My theory is that in the later radio Philco increased the voltage rating of the 0.008 cap because of the possibility of damage to the output transformer if hit by a large transient. Any feedback? Thanks!
#2

The tone ctl caps, if used in the tone-compensation scheme against the volume regulator, or in any circuit other than direct conenction to the plate of the output driver (across the primary of the audioxfmr) could be low voltage, and the sole reason I use 630V ones is because I do not want to have various voltages while I can have just one for every use.

However those used across the primary of the output xfmr, use higher voltage to withstand a possible flashover when a speaker disconnects.

My personal take on it, if the speaker is pluggable, I would use 1000V (1600V is good, but 1000 is enough).
However in a hardwired speaker this is even less likely to occur (not highly probable in the first place) and so I use 630V without thinking twoce about it.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
42-345, question for an owner
+1 for number 4 with an added theorem: The more connections in a circuit the higher the possibility of failure.RodB — 12:17 PM
Help with Readrite 410 tube tester
IMHO, Between the transformer common (where you have one lead) and any point on the rotary switch, you should be reading...MrFixr55 — 11:53 AM
Help with Readrite 410 tube tester
This is such a simple looking schematic yet its throwing me off and driving my Fluke DMM crazy. I cant get real voltage ...daveone23 — 11:23 AM
42-345, question for an owner
Rod :lol: 1. The schematic always work according to the wiring. 2. If the schematic does not work according to the wir...morzh — 10:36 AM
42-345, question for an owner
Wow Mike, that's profound! That should be the Phorum motto.RodB — 09:49 AM
Philco 269 - 444 FIVE VALVE VERSION?
Hi Chas, I hear you. If you happen to be passing NYC vs Philly, I can give it a good home also. @ RadioRoslyn, T...MrFixr55 — 09:25 AM
Bakelite crack repair - what is best epoxy?
I'm with Arran, but I use even stronger epoxy with a 72 hour cure. It is sold to knife makers for bonding wooden handles...DaleHCook — 08:47 AM
42-345, question for an owner
It cannot be wired correctly and work incorrectly. It is as simple as this: if you want to have you treble up and bas...morzh — 08:33 AM
42-345, question for an owner
Welcome to the Phorum, Noel! I don't have that radio, but I'm sure others will jump in with help. Take care and BE HEA...GarySP — 07:52 AM
42-345, question for an owner
Hello,      I am working on a Philco 42-345.  It appears that there have been many hands inside this radio before me....UpNorth — 07:42 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 3764 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 3763 Guest(s)
Avatar

>