Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco 112 speaker specifications?
#1

Do you know the field coil specifications for the speaker in the late model Model 112 with the '47 output tubes?  Somebody gutted the speaker in mine, and used one winding of some puny transformer in place of the field coil.  

Web site: http://www.masekconsulting.net
Radio Photos: http://www.photobucket.com - album id FStephenMasek
#2

If you haven't already, check Ron's spreadsheet of Philco speaker specs (speakers.zip) which can be found here:

http://philcoradio.com/phorum/showthread.php?tid=215
#3

Thanks! The clown who worked on it previously used a winding with just a few hundred ohms resistance, when the correct choke should be 3,200 ohms. That would have made B+ way too high.

Web site: http://www.masekconsulting.net
Radio Photos: http://www.photobucket.com - album id FStephenMasek
#4

 Clearly something went wrong with the speaker field coil in this set, which was why they attempted to make a choke or of a small transformer. Either it was damaged by a shorted filter cap or the winding just failed mechanically for some reason. In any event it's the inductance that matters not the DC resistance, the DC resistance of a proper iron cored choke can be lower then a type H Philco speaker and still work as long as it has the same number of Henries. It would be easier just tracking down a replacement H series speaker rather then rewinding the field coil, but if the original speaker is otherwise intact, and you can get the bobbin out of the frame to rewind it, why not give it a go just for the experience?
Regards
Arran
#5

The original speaker was gutted, as I wrote above. The end of the field coil enclosure and mounting bracket closest to the cone was drilled out to make room for the magnet of a PM speaker fastened into the old basket.

Yes, I should have written about the Henries, and I do have a meter to measure Henries, but do not know the specification of the original in Henries, just the DC ohms listed on the spreadsheet. There is no way the one winding of the small transformer the hack used would have the same rating in Henries as the large old field coil.

Web site: http://www.masekconsulting.net
Radio Photos: http://www.photobucket.com - album id FStephenMasek




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
As I remember it, the shock from that B+, about 250VDC, felt worse than the shocks I experienced from 220VAC.morzh — 09:14 AM
Hickok 288x
They worked for 85 years as .05's and my other machine which operated perfectly has them. Doubt thats the issue. Yes saf...daveone23 — 09:01 AM
462ron
LOL@ MrFixr. I remember an encounter with my first tube radio.. I think I have posted this before. Back when I knew just...462ron — 08:07 AM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
I absolutely attribute my reaching 63 to God's benevolence, but this apart, it has never occurred to me to tap anything ...morzh — 07:55 AM
Does the 20 Deluxe use photofinish?
No, it did not use photo-finish. It is veneer with the shading on the front of changing darkness.morzh — 07:52 AM
Philco 66 No Plate Voltage
We could also mention the factory miswire of the tweeters on 38-690. Or the fact that even with this fixed, one could no...morzh — 07:51 AM
462ron
Just a thought here, those caps C33-C34 are .05mfd. That high of a value can possibly pass enough 60hz current to cause ...462ron — 07:37 AM
Hickok 288x
Isnt the chassis and ground the same on this machine? My other 288x that works is an identical machine and it does not h...daveone23 — 07:05 AM
Just got a 49-1613 need to know...everything!
According to the gallery, it has an AM/FM radio, with a two speed phonograph, the 78 side is an automatic changer, the 3...Arran — 01:32 AM
Philco 37-???
During the 1937 and 38 model years Philco was big on the concept of what would now be called a "modular" desig...Arran — 12:23 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>