Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

37-89 part value question
#3

Hang on John, help is on the way...

OK. The original Philco 37-89 schematic calls for a 0.25 uF cap in parallel with a 700 ohm resistor from the IF tube cathode to ground.

I checked in the Philco Changes in Models file (available here), and there was a change in Run 5 of the 37-89 where both IF transformers were changed, an extra winding was added between the 6K7G suppressor grid and ground, and your resistor (24) was changed from 700 ohms to 400 ohms. No mention of a change in the capacitor.

The 38-89 schematic confirms: 0.25 uF in parallel with a 400 ohm resistor.

Why yours has a .05 uF cap in place of the 0.25 uF, I do not know. Maybe some long-ago radio repairman had no 0.25 uF caps in stock but had plenty of .05s, so in went the .05, the set worked well enough, so out the door it went?

As for the tube shield bases, that is odd indeed. Most 1937 Philcos have the open clip-type bases, but they started using the 1936 type bases again in 1938. Most likely, Philco had overproduced the 1936 bases and when it was found that ST-type glass octal tube bases would fit in the 1936 bases, they started using them again to restrict usage of tubes to ST-type glass, preventing the use of metal tubes unless the hole was enlarged.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN


Messages In This Thread
37-89 part value question - by LASJayhawk - 11-04-2012, 03:48 PM
RE: 37-89 part value question - by LASJayhawk - 11-10-2012, 07:48 PM
RE: 37-89 part value question - by Ron Ramirez - 11-11-2012, 08:24 AM
RE: 37-89 part value question - by LASJayhawk - 11-12-2012, 01:21 AM
RE: 37-89 part value question - by LASJayhawk - 11-20-2012, 07:24 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
AC/DC Transformer-less Sets
Fantastic report, Mr. Fixr! I had never read about AC/DC sets originally running at a higher price than AC-only models, ...jrblasde — 01:21 PM
49-504
Also wheni first power on the 7a8 gets very bright more than normal not sure what I did wrongphilco4me — 12:53 PM
49-504
Hello all I am doing a 49-504 and in section 4 I see C401is that a 5mmf ? I did not see that when I replaced the caps. ...philco4me — 12:47 PM
Looking for place to donate unique Philco Philco J-1930 Prototype
Thx for the description. I thought that it had to have a single 10 - 12" Sensor. Congrats on restoring the GE and...MrFixr55 — 10:12 AM
AC/DC Transformer-less Sets
Some of the original Edison DC generators were in use until the 1940s. The NYC subway and electrified Long Island Rail ...MrFixr55 — 09:39 AM
Samlex heavy-Duty bench supply filter question
I suggest sticking with the original values. Depending upon the design if you increase the cap values too much the incre...DaleHCook — 08:55 AM
AC/DC Transformer-less Sets
You’re welcome! I was born in 1995, so this is all second-hand information to me from the industry. I did some research ...jrblasde — 08:38 AM
Samlex heavy-Duty bench supply filter question
Hello Everyone, I have one of my Heavy-duty bench powersuplies made by Samlex it's 13.8 volt dc 20-25 amp supply. What I...radiorich — 11:24 PM
Looking for place to donate unique Philco Philco J-1930 Prototype
It's a Glaser Sears changer which Philco's engineers thought was an upgrade over a VM, but in retrospect I'd prefer the ...jeibner — 10:39 PM
AC/DC Transformer-less Sets
Joseph, Thank you for the confirmation. I knew that there must be more to the Transformer-less AC/DC radios than the ...PeterN — 10:30 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>