[462ron]

Howard, did you reinsert that pin that I mentioned using a magnet to extract? I believe it is what finally holds the whole assembly together!

Ron

[morzh]

Ron

I am not sure he could make the assembly stay together in the first place.

[HowardWoodard]

Wow morzh, you have access to some very useful doc.  That cross-section (Fig 2) is dynamite.

   

As you can see, if the ball wasn't attached to the vernier shaft, the shaft would simply back/fall out.  Which is exactly what happens to mine now.

Starting tomorrow I'm gonna start calling some of these local Boeing fab shops that do the small custom fabrications.  Even if they won't reattach it for me, they might tell me what the best method for doing so is.

Thanks.

Btw, here's a pic of a different '30s Philco radio fine tuning mech.  It's a different model but they used the same method for implementing vernier control.  Note the ball-end.

All-American Five Philco 54C – Part 5 – Philco Library

   

[HowardWoodard]

Hi Ron. Yes, I got it all back together the first time, after getting it all cleaned and lubed, and it was working really nice. It was while I was inserting the pin you refer to that holds the coarse shaft -- thus the entire assembly -- in place that the end-ball came off the vernier shaft.

[morzh]

I think that's the one I have in Philco 60, which I have recently fixed.
The last robodial radio repair (38-690) happened in 2017, and I simply forgot how I did that. I remember the pin did not want to come out.
But for the life of me I do not recall the ball at the end and what I did about it.
The end of the shaft then should be concave so the ball readily goes into it when glued.

[HowardWoodard]

It is concave and the balls rests in it about 25%-33% of the circumference of the ball.  I'm just contemplating which would be the strongest option -- epoxy, super glue or silver solder -- before I put it back together.

[morzh]

Looking at the drawing, the ball should be glued well, as it seems that it rolling against the 3 other balls is what provides the planetary action. And the ball is probably a polished/plated metal, so not every adhesive will stick to it well.
Probably need to find out an adhesive specifically for it.
I wonder if it was too complex for them to machine the shaft such that it would have the ball-shaped end. Probably would be.

[HowardWoodard]

I think you’re right about everything. A couple years later they were machining it out of a single piece of metal. Still had the issue of needing the end- ball to be hardened.

At any rate, needing the get the ball attachment right and knowing nothing about adhesives or metallurgy, I’m being deliberate.

As much as I enjoy re-lifeing things, if I run across a complete tuning shaft assembly or even just a complete vernier shaft, I’m gonna buy it.

[rfeenstra]

Are you sure that the flange at the end of the shaft isn't just completely worn off or bent over causing the indentation that looks like it should hold the ball bearing.?  If I remember correctly on my 37-116's and my 38-116, the flange that pushed against the 3 ball bearings was machined in and the purpose of the ball was a bearing point for the spring to push against to reduce wear and friction.  the picture you have of the AA5 shaft is the correct shape.  The 3 balls may have frozen in the shaft and when the fine shaft was turned, it caused a lot of wear, eventually wearing the flange completely away.

Here is a photo of one from a Scott 16 where the fine shaft was worn out.  I had to make a new one on a lathe.  It works the same way.  The spring pushed on a ball bearing which then pushed on the end of the fine shaft.  The 3 ball bearings ride in the groove and are pushed against the flange.  The outer housing (not shown) holds the ball bearings in place.  As Morzh said, a planetary arrangement.

   

[HowardWoodard]

As you might have already surmised, I’m not sure of anything. You raise a good question and your pic gives it credibility. 

In this case my guess is based on seeing another one that fits my guess.