Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco 112 speaker specifications?
#1

Do you know the field coil specifications for the speaker in the late model Model 112 with the '47 output tubes?  Somebody gutted the speaker in mine, and used one winding of some puny transformer in place of the field coil.  

Web site: http://www.masekconsulting.net
Radio Photos: http://www.photobucket.com - album id FStephenMasek
#2

If you haven't already, check Ron's spreadsheet of Philco speaker specs (speakers.zip) which can be found here:

http://philcoradio.com/phorum/showthread.php?tid=215
#3

Thanks! The clown who worked on it previously used a winding with just a few hundred ohms resistance, when the correct choke should be 3,200 ohms. That would have made B+ way too high.

Web site: http://www.masekconsulting.net
Radio Photos: http://www.photobucket.com - album id FStephenMasek
#4

 Clearly something went wrong with the speaker field coil in this set, which was why they attempted to make a choke or of a small transformer. Either it was damaged by a shorted filter cap or the winding just failed mechanically for some reason. In any event it's the inductance that matters not the DC resistance, the DC resistance of a proper iron cored choke can be lower then a type H Philco speaker and still work as long as it has the same number of Henries. It would be easier just tracking down a replacement H series speaker rather then rewinding the field coil, but if the original speaker is otherwise intact, and you can get the bobbin out of the frame to rewind it, why not give it a go just for the experience?
Regards
Arran
#5

The original speaker was gutted, as I wrote above. The end of the field coil enclosure and mounting bracket closest to the cone was drilled out to make room for the magnet of a PM speaker fastened into the old basket.

Yes, I should have written about the Henries, and I do have a meter to measure Henries, but do not know the specification of the original in Henries, just the DC ohms listed on the spreadsheet. There is no way the one winding of the small transformer the hack used would have the same rating in Henries as the large old field coil.

Web site: http://www.masekconsulting.net
Radio Photos: http://www.photobucket.com - album id FStephenMasek




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 60 Squealing
I seem to remember eliminating a squeal by changing the IF frequency by a few KHz. Not that you should put too much tru...fenbach — 08:48 PM
Philco 42-390, code 121 speaker
These speakers pop up on eBay regularly, even if at bloated prices. Honestly, have not seen many parts on swapmeets.morzh — 08:38 PM
Philco 38-7 Speaker
The put-put is not like the speaker problem.morzh — 08:29 PM
Mission Bell Model 19A Car Radio
Hello everyone,  As mentioned in my last post I was going to see if the vibrator / rectifier section could be persuaded...Antipodal — 08:21 PM
Philco 60 Squealing
Wondering if I did it backwards. If a coil was wound backwards, the oscillator would not work at all. Old school...Chas — 07:23 PM
Philco 38-7 Speaker
4-ohm speaker. Black, Green leads.tludka — 07:00 PM
Philco 42-390, code 121 speaker
#87 on the schematic.  This radio had a 8" Zenith  speaker attached to it when I got it. I do don't know the hist...Stevelog — 06:39 PM
Philco 60 Squealing
I'm pretty sure I now have the litz wire soldered. This did not make any difference. Back in April I rewound the seconda...dconant — 06:25 PM
Philco 38-7 Speaker
Just to make sure, you chose either 4 ohm into 5K or into 10K? (blk-org or blk-grn)morzh — 06:23 PM
Philco 38-7 Speaker
I have let this one sit because of other duties. Now I am back, and I have a couple of questions. I hooked up a Hammond ...tludka — 05:34 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>