Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Fisher turntable and TX-300
#16

Kirk

Icon_thumbup Icon_thumbup on both. Icon_smile

You want fast acting fuses for the four output transistor (speaker) fuses, but the manufacturer specifies slow-blow for the line (mains) fuse only.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#17

Thanks Ron,
She is killing me now.. She doesnt know how to replace them....
I am not even getting paid, Icon_lol

Me

Times I have been electrocuted in 2021
As of 1/01/2021
AC: 4 DC: 1
Last year: 6
#18

Ron

Indeed if the transistor output oscillates it will try in no time (subsecond). Had it happened to me.
This said, most output amps, even those with one supply are designed as DC amps with DC blocking caps at input and output if one supply and none with dual supply (and differential amp for the input stage). They are also frequency-compensated to be stable and this in a well-defined amp does not depend on whether the load is there or not.

A not so well designed amp might go into excitation but .....bad designs are bad designs, this is it.

Here's a food for thought: many if not all transistor amps have the button that disconnect the speakers. Do you think they would do this if the amp were to oscillate?
My Kenwood has it, and once on a while they get disconnected, and I see that bar moving with no sound, and then I know the speakers are not on.

So....no, a good amp will never oscillate with no load.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#19

Kirk


Haven't you learned yet? Fixing stuff for ladies you know you do not get paid. Ladies do know that very well Icon_lol

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#20

Yeah,
She went from asking if I could repair it to getting me to do all her homework, Icon_lol

Sheesh!

Times I have been electrocuted in 2021
As of 1/01/2021
AC: 4 DC: 1
Last year: 6
#21

Do you also carry her bag all the way to school? Icon_lol

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#22

(01-29-2016, 07:09 PM)morzh Wrote:  ...most output amps, even those with one supply are designed as DC amps with DC blocking caps at input and output if one supply and none with dual supply (and differential amp for the input stage). They are also frequency-compensated to be stable and this in a well-defined amp does not depend on whether the load is there or not.

...yes, but...

We're talking about 1965 when high fidelity transistor amps were still in their infancy.

And to make matters worse, half of the eight output transistors used in the TX-300 are germanium! And there are no blocking caps between the output transistors and the speakers in this amp.

This was technology that was still developing.

Quote:Here's a food for thought: many if not all transistor amps have the button that disconnect the speakers.

None of my Fishers have such a button...and neither does Kirk's friend's TX-300.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#23

Yeah...maybe back then.....(I did not imply DC cap saves it though, it does not even matter,simply allows unipolar DC amp to drive low ohms load) ....

I built two Ge transistor amps, the first being transformer output pushpull on Soviet P210
http://www.155la3.ru/p209.htm
(the largest Ge transistor at the time....well, the biggest of all times were P207-P208 but they were discontinued by that time)
http://www.155la3.ru/p207.htm
Behold. 74мм flange. The contacts were so this when one broke it was possible to drill in it, tap a thread and put a screw in. A 25A capable device, in those times.

Another was your regular pushpull with DC blocking cap on P215
http://www.radiolibrary.ru/reference/tra.../p215.html
These are smaller, about 10w dissip.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 39-116 radio and remote
The transformer I located is from a Philco TV chassis, circa 1948. The part number is 32-8391 I do have the replace...Brad Winder — 08:59 PM
Philco 41-221 Restored
Hello Rod, Wow that radio looks great nice job ! Sincerely Richardradiorich — 07:39 PM
Philco 269 - 444 FIVE VALVE VERSION?
From what I can remember the model 444 "People's Radio" used a special tube/valve called a PenDD61, it was the...Arran — 06:54 PM
Philco 41-221 Restored
Nice Radioslford310 — 06:24 PM
Philco 269 - 444 FIVE VALVE VERSION?
Hi Chaz,  You may want to post the tubes used in your radio.   From Radio Museum, it seems that the set uses some ...MrFixr55 — 05:14 PM
Philco 41-221 Restored
Today my grandson and I finished the restoration of this Philco 41-221. It has had all the rubber coated wiring replaced...RodB — 03:19 PM
Philco 39-116 radio and remote
Hi Brad, I had no idea that the overheating was problematic in this radio.  Do you know the part number of the transfor...RichG — 03:01 PM
Philco 269 - 444 FIVE VALVE VERSION?
From the photo it looks the sockets are screwed and the front one does not even match the hole.morzh — 02:54 PM
Philco 269 - 444 FIVE VALVE VERSION?
Hi Chas a welcome, Perhaps we'll have to reverse engineer this to sort it. So let's start w/what tubes does it use? And...Radioroslyn — 12:28 PM
Philco 39-116 radio and remote
Hi Rich, From my experience, unfortunately it is not uncommon to find the power transformer in the 39-116 to be overhea...Brad Winder — 09:25 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>